bmeadows 4 Posted September 24 Due to all the recent blocked field goals lately, is it an option to move the holder back an additional 3 to 5 yards? It would be a longer kick, but more likely to not get blocked especially in game winning kick situations. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,284 Posted September 24 The option is better blocking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
plasma george 63 Posted September 24 1 hour ago, bmeadows said: Due to all the recent blocked field goals lately, is it an option to move the holder back an additional 3 to 5 yards? It would be a longer kick, but more likely to not get blocked especially in game winning kick situations. Don't think that's an option, it's a set FG formation. If it was an option we would definitely see this on shorter FGs, IE under 40 yards, to guarantee it won't get blocked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 2,345 Posted September 25 11 hours ago, weepaws said: The option is better blocking. 100% Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray_T 780 Posted September 25 19 hours ago, bmeadows said: Due to all the recent blocked field goals lately, is it an option to move the holder back an additional 3 to 5 yards? It would be a longer kick, but more likely to not get blocked especially in game winning kick situations. I thought they already did that on the longer field goals. as those are more line drives they are easier to block than the short ones because they dont get as much height when crossing the LOS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,854 Posted September 28 Moving the holder back would make it easier for the edge rushers to get an angle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites