Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Lake209

  • Rank
    FF Geek

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

2,161 profile views
  1. Lake209

    Nyheim Hines: New Contract vs. W2W FF-value

    Ha ha...nice analysis Ray_T. So...in W1: Mack gets 19 touches, JT & Hines both get 8. Then, Mack becomes the 5th RB on the Ravens depth chart. That's awesome right there. click>click>click>Trey Sermon now starting in Flex; Hines=bench.
  2. News today is that Hines was singed to a new 18.5m contract-extension. Think I read that this makes him the highest paid #2 across all-team depth charts in the NFL. <--Not sure if that's accurate, but has got to put him close to the '#1' of pass-catcher types who run behind lead RB1's. Question really boils down to flex-worthiness week to week. Does the new-contract-extension equate to more touches per game? Do you flex HInes in W1 (vs. Seahawks)? Moving forward, is he flex-worthy in most weeks? I realize, this question begets who else you start and is on your bench...but *generally-speaking*: do you think the new contract enhances Hines value?
  3. Lake209

    Results + Help w/Flex

    Thanks very much, x2.
  4. Lake209

    Results + Help w/Flex

    12-Team/PPR/(no TE)/QB, 2-RB, 2-WR, 2-Flex QB: K.Murray RB: A.Jones, M.Gaskin, D.Harris, T.Sermon, N.Hines, G.Bernard, J.McKinnon WR: C.Ridley, K.Allen, J.Chase, Mike Williams(LAC), D.Mooney, Rondale Moore DST: Ravens PK: Tyler Bass Feedback if you wish. Help: Need 2 flex-players for W1. Option 1: D.Harris + J.Chase. Option 2: D.Harris + M.Williams. Option 3: J.Chase + M.Williams. Option 4: You call it. Option 5: Quit this league and enjoy something I’m good at.
  5. Lake209

    Lazard. Flex-worthy-or-better?

    Finally, a projection: 10
  6. He looked good with a limited number of snaps this past Monday. A bit of play afterwards on popular fantasy sites & podcasts...but really, not much in the way of a viable add. Adams/Allison/and MVS banged up. The GB #4 (...Slayton?..name escapes me) looked pretty bad in the past weeks game. Aaron Rogers paid high compliments to Lazard after the game... My *S*N-app has Lazard projected at 0 points. Why? Anyone else like the player this week? Start-worthy?..or am I way off base?
  7. Lake209

    1x4 Flex play

    Thanks Axe. Diggs is in...I just dont like it for purely greedy reasons (aka: the thought of losing). I may swap-out tomorrow...Waller is my #2..
  8. Lake209

    WR for WR trade - would you?

    I heard San Fran was trying to land ESanders...like above...probably some radio or podcast... Yeah, I’d hold Diggs. Dorsett might end up just as good as Gorden for fantasy purposes. Diggs is far, far superior to JG. Wait a week or 3
  9. Lake209

    PPR Flex help

    Sony got a ‘start of the week’ either here or on Roto or both... Seems that he’d get fed both early & late in the game with the Pats easily handling the Skins
  10. Lake209

    TY Hilton or Gallman?

    If TY’s status in the morning is for a ‘gametime decision,’ I would not risk laying an egg - and would roll w/your RB.
  11. Lake209

    Who to flex?

    White. 8 or more catches & a score not out of the question.
  12. Lake209

    Which WR to go with?

    Robinson seems the safest and has a good matchup. Williams injury & split w/x2 other backs make you other two options better imo. I have Dorsett too...but am thinking the Skins will be out of the game by the half. He’ll have to score a td this week to be really good
  13. Lake209

    Which Quarterback

    It’s close - but Winston. He’s playing well
  14. Lake209

    Trade for Boyd?

    IMO; the value down the stretch seems fairly equal for both, given the status in KC of McCoy & Darrel getting carries w/DWill. Boyd is a good WR2 or high-end WR3, even with Green. What jrokh said: if you need a every week steady WR - then sure
  15. Lake209

    Rate my 1-3 TEAM

    Kelce should be a monster this week. If he goes nuts, would be hard to trade him but i’d be you could get a great high value player in exchange. If Dak does well in W5: same thing: try some package trade to the guy who lost Brees/Trubisky/BenRoth. Your RB group looks decent; maybe ahoot for a WR upgrade