Battle-Tested 0 Posted January 18, 2005 Our current scoring for QB's is +4 per TD and -2 per INT. There was a suggestion to increase the values............... Here are some options to chose from: Option #1 Rules stays the same......+4 per TD and -2 per INT. Option #2 +4 per TD and -1 per INT Option #3 +5 per TD and -2 per INT Option #4 +6 per TD and -2 per INT Option #5 +6 per TD and -3 per INT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Battle-Tested 0 Posted January 18, 2005 Official tally: Option #1 S&S Epress Ugly Stick Horsemen Option #2 No Talent Ass Clowns Patriot Missiles Hammerheads Serbian Assassin Big Tuna Folston Comets Option #3 Wahoos Option #4 Option #5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Battle-Tested 0 Posted January 18, 2005 As an owner, I think QBs score enough as is................. I will go with...........Option #1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hoos First 0 Posted January 18, 2005 I would prefer 4, but I think I have a better chance at #3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Battle-Tested 0 Posted January 18, 2005 I would prefer 4, but I think I have a better chance at #3 So which is it.............do you want #4 or #3? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hoos First 0 Posted January 18, 2005 I would prefer 4, but I think I have a better chance at #3 So which is it.............do you want #4 or #3? #3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrJ 0 Posted January 18, 2005 I am voting for #1. I might be open to one of the other options if we set it to go into effect in 06 or something. I prefer not to do anything that will significantly alter player values, but I may be open if teams actually had a chance to adjust their rosters accordingly rather than it just being a "bam, Peyton Manning is worth more than he was yesterday!" type of thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miller_Time_21 0 Posted January 18, 2005 #2, TD's are fine, but INT's are a bit much @ -2 IMO Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hellothere 1 Posted January 19, 2005 #2 but i would be ok with 1 as my secondary choice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jetdoc 20 Posted January 19, 2005 Interesting. I'll have to ponder this one over a bit. I don't like the fact that we are heavily penalized for INT's (hell, a fumble's only -1)... But I also don't like significantly altering player values, which this would do since many QB's throw 20 INT's/year (that's 20 points). I'll make my official vote later. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrJ 0 Posted January 19, 2005 #2, TD's are fine, but INT's are a bit much @ -2 IMO Yeah, if I had Carson Palmer at QB I'd be looking to reduce the Int penalty as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miller_Time_21 0 Posted January 19, 2005 #2, TD's are fine, but INT's are a bit much @ -2 IMO Yeah, if I had Carson Palmer at QB I'd be looking to reduce the Int penalty as well. hell you have Ben, you should be behind it to when they "unleash" him! Cause we all have seen the real Ben now! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrJ 0 Posted January 19, 2005 #2, TD's are fine, but INT's are a bit much @ -2 IMO Yeah, if I had Carson Palmer at QB I'd be looking to reduce the Int penalty as well. hell you have Ben, you should be to when the "unleash" him! Cause we all have seen the real Ben now! Why did you have to go and ruin a perfectly good joke with this predictable dribble? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miller_Time_21 0 Posted January 19, 2005 #2, TD's are fine, but INT's are a bit much @ -2 IMO Yeah, if I had Carson Palmer at QB I'd be looking to reduce the Int penalty as well. hell you have Ben, you should be to when the "unleash" him! Cause we all have seen the real Ben now! Why did you have to go and ruin a perfectly good joke with this predictable dribble? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Battle-Tested 0 Posted January 20, 2005 It's official........... Option #2 wins..............rules are changed. I will lock this thread for now just so I know we are done here. On to the next one............. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
