Autumn Wind 0 Posted July 14, 2005 (edited) **Only returning owners from last season will have their votes counted. Once voting is complete, we will move on to the next topic.** Topic #1 - How many teams should each owner have? One or two? Thin Spirit T-Town Ballers Rae Carruth's Cell Mate - 1 cdub100 BlackClouds - 1 GuardBum - 1 yanko - 1 Scooter1027 - 1 Autumn Wind cmh6476 - 2 laxboy - 1 drobeski edjr - 1 JasperisOK - 1 ozzie1 With 8 votes for one team per owner, the voting is done. Edited July 15, 2005 by Autumn Wind Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Autumn Wind 0 Posted July 14, 2005 With the current amount of owners, I think 2 is fine. If we want to add more we obviously have to go with one. I kind of like the idea of adding more owners and just paring down the rosters a bit, but I'm not certain yet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yanko 11 Posted July 14, 2005 It's way too hard to do 2, IMO. If we had less owners 3 would be ideal. Since that isn't feasible mark me down for 1 with the anticipation that there will be some sort of draft change along the lines of what edjr has mentioned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cmh6476 760 Posted July 14, 2005 It's way too hard to do 2, IMO. If we had less owners 3 would be ideal. Since that isn't feasible mark me down for 1 with the anticipation that there will be some sort of draft change along the lines of what edjr has mentioned. I wouldnt mind doign one team, and then having a supplemental draft of all leftover players as long as I'm picking first!!@# actualyl, another possibly maybe good idea would be drawing for draft order with our single teams, and then going in reverse order for the supplemental picks so the guy picking last doesnt get completely screwed over But then, you have to realize that the true intention of this league (using players on a homer team) has pretty much been thrown out the window. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GuardBum 73 Posted July 14, 2005 It's way too hard to do 2, IMO. If we had less owners 3 would be ideal. Since that isn't feasible mark me down for 1 with the anticipation that there will be some sort of draft change along the lines of what edjr has mentioned. I wouldnt mind doign one team, and then having a supplemental draft of all leftover players as long as I'm picking first!!@# actualyl, another possibly maybe good idea would be drawing for draft order with our single teams, and then going in reverse order for the supplemental picks so the guy picking last doesnt get completely screwed over But then, you have to realize that the true intention of this league (using players on a homer team) has pretty much been thrown out the window. this sounds decent but just keep the sup draft to a minimum number of rounds...4 maybe...3 even just to fill needs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlackClouds 24 Posted July 14, 2005 1 team + a supp draft sounds good to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Autumn Wind 0 Posted July 14, 2005 It's way too hard to do 2, IMO. If we had less owners 3 would be ideal. Since that isn't feasible mark me down for 1 with the anticipation that there will be some sort of draft change along the lines of what edjr has mentioned. I wouldnt mind doign one team, and then having a supplemental draft of all leftover players as long as I'm picking first!!@# actualyl, another possibly maybe good idea would be drawing for draft order with our single teams, and then going in reverse order for the supplemental picks so the guy picking last doesnt get completely screwed over But then, you have to realize that the true intention of this league (using players on a homer team) has pretty much been thrown out the window. this sounds decent but just keep the sup draft to a minimum number of rounds...4 maybe...3 even just to fill needs So what's your vote? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GuardBum 73 Posted July 14, 2005 It's way too hard to do 2, IMO. If we had less owners 3 would be ideal. Since that isn't feasible mark me down for 1 with the anticipation that there will be some sort of draft change along the lines of what edjr has mentioned. I wouldnt mind doign one team, and then having a supplemental draft of all leftover players as long as I'm picking first!!@# actualyl, another possibly maybe good idea would be drawing for draft order with our single teams, and then going in reverse order for the supplemental picks so the guy picking last doesnt get completely screwed over But then, you have to realize that the true intention of this league (using players on a homer team) has pretty much been thrown out the window. this sounds decent but just keep the sup draft to a minimum number of rounds...4 maybe...3 even just to fill needs So what's your vote? 1 and a supplemental of 3 or 4 rounds Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yanko 11 Posted July 15, 2005 It's way too hard to do 2, IMO. If we had less owners 3 would be ideal. Since that isn't feasible mark me down for 1 with the anticipation that there will be some sort of draft change along the lines of what edjr has mentioned. I wouldnt mind doign one team, and then having a supplemental draft of all leftover players as long as I'm picking first!!@# actualyl, another possibly maybe good idea would be drawing for draft order with our single teams, and then going in reverse order for the supplemental picks so the guy picking last doesnt get completely screwed over But then, you have to realize that the true intention of this league (using players on a homer team) has pretty much been thrown out the window. Perhaps each team is given x amount of franchise tags which they can use to draft any player they want in the rounds of their choice. You'd still be drafting only homer eligible players but with a few wild card picks thrown in. This could be a solution to the 2 team format if we kept that. Also if you allowed the trading of picks and or franchise tags one should have enough manuverability to fill their holes. At least it would bring in some much needed strategy to this unique league. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
laxboy05 0 Posted July 15, 2005 one team and let's keep proposing new ideas to another thread...this is just a voting thread... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,591 Posted July 15, 2005 1 team + a supp draft sounds good to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,591 Posted July 15, 2005 It's way too hard to do 2, IMO. If we had less owners 3 would be ideal. Since that isn't feasible mark me down for 1 with the anticipation that there will be some sort of draft change along the lines of what edjr has mentioned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scooter1027 0 Posted July 15, 2005 I'll say one team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rae Carruth's Cell Mate 0 Posted July 15, 2005 I'd be down for 1 team, just as long as nobody gets to manage the Raiders. After Moss I got nobody worth drafting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JasperisOK 0 Posted July 15, 2005 1 team + a supp draft sounds good to me. Count me in! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Autumn Wind 0 Posted July 15, 2005 OK, we have a majority. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites