Scatterjack 0 Posted August 4, 2003 What is it? I couldnt find it on yahoo This is a 15 round fraft correct? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flipya4real 0 Posted August 4, 2003 Scatterjack: What is it? I couldnt find it on yahoo This is a 15 round fraft correct? Statistical Categories (Offense): Passing Yards (25 yards per point)Passing Touchdowns (4) Rushing Yards (10 yards per point) Rushing Touchdowns (6) Reception Yards (10 yards per point) Reception Touchdowns (6) Return Touchdowns (6) 2 Point Conversions (2) Statistical Categories (Kickers): Field Goals 0-19 Yards (3) Field Goals 20-29 Yards (3) Field Goals 30-39 Yards (3) Field Goals 40-49 Yards (3) Field Goals 50+ Yards (5) Point After Attempt Made (1) Statistical Categories (Defense Teams): 0 Pts Allowed (12) 1-6 Pts Allowed (8) 7-13 Pts Allowed (4) 14-20 Pts Allowed (2) 21-27 Pts Allowed (0) 28-34 Pts Allowed (-2) 35+ Pts Allowed (-5) Sack (1) Interception (1) Fumble Recovery (1) Touchdown (6) Safety (5) Return Touchdowns (6) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Burt 43 Posted August 4, 2003 Starters: 1QB 2RB 2WR 1WR/TE 1WR/RB 1K 1D/ST 15 rounds Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
b2b jaxx 0 Posted August 11, 2004 Scatterjack: What is it? I couldnt find it on yahoo This is a 15 round fraft correct? Statistical Categories (Defense Teams): Interception (1) Fumble Recovery (1) Safety (5) wow! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Burt 43 Posted August 11, 2004 Scatterjack: What is it? I couldnt find it on yahoo This is a 15 round fraft correct? Statistical Categories (Defense Teams): Interception (1) Fumble Recovery (1) Safety (5) wow! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Burt 43 Posted August 12, 2004 This is basically the same system I was planning on using this year. Any gripes, suggestions...post 'em here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grassweasel 0 Posted August 16, 2004 clarify this for me...we have these options of starters for RB, WR & TE 2 RB 3 WR 1 TE or 2 RB 4 WR or 3 RB 2 WR 1 TE or 3 RB 3 WR Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
b2b jaxx 0 Posted August 16, 2004 clarify this for me...we have these options of starters for RB, WR & TE i also wondered why the change was made for 2 wr/te positions. if anyone is planning on starting 2 te's, let's make this a money league!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Burt 43 Posted August 16, 2004 clarify this for me...we have these options of starters for RB, WR & TE i also wondered why the change was made for 2 wr/te positions. if anyone is planning on starting 2 te's, let's make this a money league!!! I changed it just in case. There's a couple of TE's that will outscore some of the crapass WR's that a few of you will start. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TylerRoseFan 16 Posted August 8, 2005 Same scoring rules? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TylerRoseFan 16 Posted August 8, 2005 Draft Type: Offline Draft Max Teams: 10 Scoring Type: Head-to-Head Start Scoring on: Week 1 Can't Cut List Provider: None Max Moves: No maximum Max Trades: No maximum Trade Reject Time: 1 Trade End Date: November 25, 2005 Trade Review: League Votes Waiver Time: 1 day Post Draft Players: Follow Waiver Rules Playoffs: Week 14, 15 and 16 (6 teams) Roster Positions: QB, RB, RB, W/T, W/T, W/T, W/R, K, DEF, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN Stat Categories: Passing Yards (25 yards per point) Passing Touchdowns (4) Rushing Yards (10 yards per point) Rushing Touchdowns (6) Reception Yards (10 yards per point) Reception Touchdowns (6) Return Touchdowns (6) 2-Point Conversions (2) Offensive Fumble Return TD (6) Field Goals 0-19 Yards (3) Field Goals 20-29 Yards (3) Field Goals 30-39 Yards (3) Field Goals 40-49 Yards (4) Field Goals 50+ Yards (5) Point After Attempt Made (1) Sack (1) Interception (1) Fumble Recovery (1) Touchdown (6) Safety (5) Kickoff and Punt Return Touchdowns (6) Points Allowed 0 points (10) Points Allowed 1-6 points (7) Points Allowed 7-13 points (4) Points Allowed 14-20 points (1) Points Allowed 21-27 points (0) Points Allowed 28-34 points (0) Points Allowed 35+ points (0) Fractional Points: No Negative Points: Yes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yanko 11 Posted August 9, 2005 Starters: 1QB 2RB 2WR 1WR/TE 1WR/RB 1K 1D/ST 15 rounds That's not how it shows up in Yahoo. This is what it shows: QB RB RB W/T (flex) W/T (flex) W/T (flex) W/R (flex) K DEF Judging by the settings currently in Yahoo there is no requirement to start a WR and one could start 3RBs, 0WRs and 3TEs. Is this what we want? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flipya4real 0 Posted August 9, 2005 Starters: 1QB 2RB 2WR 1WR/TE 1WR/RB 1K 1D/ST 15 rounds That's not how it shows up in Yahoo. This is what it shows: QB RB RB W/T (flex) W/T (flex) W/T (flex) W/R (flex) K DEF Judging by the settings currently in Yahoo there is no requirement to start a WR and one could start 3RBs, 0WRs and 3TEs. Is this what we want? The posts at the top of this thread are from 2003....the first year of the league Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zap 0 Posted August 9, 2005 Judging by the settings currently in Yahoo there is no requirement to start a WR and one could start 3RBs, 0WRs and 3TEs. Is this what we want? No wrs, 3rbs and 3tes? That would be the jumbo offense. I don't see a negative difference made to any strategy by having the w/t flex options instead of wr, wr, w/t. Most of us go w/o a te in this league. If you want to run with Gonzo Gates and Heap, knock yourself out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yanko 11 Posted August 9, 2005 Judging by the settings currently in Yahoo there is no requirement to start a WR and one could start 3RBs, 0WRs and 3TEs. Is this what we want? No wrs, 3rbs and 3tes? That would be the jumbo offense. I don't see a negative difference made to any strategy by having the w/t flex options instead of wr, wr, w/t. Most of us go w/o a te in this league. If you want to run with Gonzo Gates and Heap, knock yourself out. I'm just clarifying whether or not starting a WR is mandatory and it appears not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Burt 43 Posted August 9, 2005 Judging by the settings currently in Yahoo there is no requirement to start a WR and one could start 3RBs, 0WRs and 3TEs. Is this what we want? No wrs, 3rbs and 3tes? That would be the jumbo offense. I don't see a negative difference made to any strategy by having the w/t flex options instead of wr, wr, w/t. Most of us go w/o a te in this league. If you want to run with Gonzo Gates and Heap, knock yourself out. I'm just clarifying whether or not starting a WR is mandatory and it appears not. We're just lumping the WRs and TEs into one category. Last season we only had the option of putting one TE in. In this scenario, you can play any multiple of WRs and TEs as long as their sum equals 3. 3WR, 0TE 2WR, 1TE 1WR, 2TE 0WR, 3TE It just gives you more options to manage your team. Its open for debate, though. If the majority would rather only have the ability to start 1 TE I can change it. But its possible for a team that already has TGonz that the best possible draft option come their turn is Gates. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
