Sho Nuff 719 Posted July 26, 2006 12 votes for SF and 2 for NO is a joke. SF goes out, signs a better all around WR as the #1, drafts a playmaking receiver in Davis, and steals Larry allen from Dallas to beef up an O-line that has a returning Jennings. Meanwhile, NO has the same rotten defense, the same rotten O-Line, an aging Horn, Brees at QB coming off rotator cuff surgery, McAllister coming off serious injury and Bush ready to miss the season. can someone explain why people aren't voting for them? do people seriously believe they'll be better than DET, SF or NYJ this year? Dude...you cried this time last year when people were talking about how bad they are. They are still bad. Get over it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BennyAndTheJets 0 Posted July 26, 2006 Even though I'm a Jets homer...they won 4 games last season under the worst conditions possible. They are arguably in better shape and a better position to win this season, so I see their win total improving over last year. So by saying the Jets are going to be the worst team this year would mean they'd actually have to be worst then last year's team which makes no sense. As far as I'm concerned this thread isn't even legit because Buffalo isn't one of the choices. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swamp dog 0 Posted July 26, 2006 Even though I'm a Jets homer...they won 4 games last season under the worst conditions possible. They are arguably in better shape and a better position to win this season, so I see their win total improving over last year. So by saying the Jets are going to be the worst team this year would mean they'd actually have to be worst then last year's team which makes no sense. As far as I'm concerned this thread isn't even legit because Buffalo isn't one of the choices. i like the young o-line and what they did in the draft there this year...but the new coach, chuck mangione, or whatever his name is, really, really scares me. and i don't mean in a good way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
football_scooter 0 Posted July 27, 2006 Dude...you cried this time last year when people were talking about how bad they are. They are still bad. Get over it. Uh, no. i agreed with those who said they were bad. Good try though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zmanzzzz 1 Posted July 27, 2006 Uh, no. i agreed with those who said they were bad. Good try though. but did you cry? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
t.j 35 Posted July 27, 2006 Why the hell did you combine two teams? It offends me that 5 people voted for was but it appears as though they could have been voting for oak. Also, where's the "other" option? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted July 27, 2006 Uh, no. i agreed with those who said they were bad. Good try though. Nice of you to flip to that now since the crash wiped out the records of your whining last offseason anytime someone said the 9ers would be bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zmanzzzz 1 Posted July 27, 2006 Why the hell did you combine two teams? It offends me that 5 people voted for was but it appears as though they could have been voting for oak. Also, where's the "other" option? i was in a hurry when i made this poll and didnt do my homework. i got to selection 10 and i paniced. i slapped down two teams that have a history of sucking. if you actually read the thread instead of poking holes in it you will realise i was called out early on and tried to edit the selections but it wouldnt let me. so i made a verbal ruling the buf belonged in the 10 spot instead of was or oak. got it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MacAir747 0 Posted July 27, 2006 can anyone explain why the texans only have 6 votes?!Will Mario Williams really give these guys 4 more wins? I didn't realize Mario Williams was the only move the Texans made this offseason. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RicemanX 20 Posted July 27, 2006 I didn't realize Mario Williams was the only move the Texans made this offseason. Oops, forgot about Oldman Moulds, sorry Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duffman 0 Posted July 28, 2006 Jets, no question. enough said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
football_scooter 0 Posted July 28, 2006 Nice of you to flip to that now since the crash wiped out the records of your whining last offseason anytime someone said the 9ers would be bad. You are one derranged individual. How nice for you to go making crap up because the server crashed and I can't prove what a liar you are. What I said about the Niners last year in the preseason was that they were finally moving in the right direction in firing Erickson, and hiring Nolan & Co. I wasn't at all happy with the OC, but Nolan & Singletary were signs of improvement. I also said that they would be lucky to be competitive by 2007, which is what I've said all along and have said since then about the Niners. The posts you might be thinking of where I'd be defending anything were the following: 1. posts where I defended Barlow. If you do a quick search, you'll see that I've not wavered on this at all. I have defended him even recently. 2. posts in which I have defended Alex Smith - not saying he's great, but that it's too soon to call him a bust. Now seriously - go fock yourself with a spiked bat. but did you cry? ok, that I did do. sniffle...sniff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zmanzzzz 1 Posted July 28, 2006 still no votes for arz, im gunna log out and vote for them with an alias. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alntaf95 0 Posted July 28, 2006 The Packers are the worst of the worst. I wish Bret Farv knew when to quit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
