Religion of peace gets another victory via Liberals

[Ravens 03 0]

[Sho Nuff 720]

Waffle much Waffleboy? And I quote.....

wiffleball Jul 2 2007, 06:16 PM

 

[[[it's generally not the Quaran, but the teachings of Mohammed and others that advocate and justify violent conversion & strict adherence to & worldwide deference to, Sharia law that are the problem.

 

That's basically what the Pope tried to say, but the ragheads got so cry.gif about it, that the point was lost.

 

That's basically their tactic - cry.gif furiously for their rights while beating down & violently supressing the rights of anybody who disagrees with them.

 

...and we're letting them do it.

 

As for deporting all Muslims, I certainly disagree. However, immigration & visas are a privledge, not a right. Many of those preaching hatred in the UK and here are not citizens. For the life of me, I don't understand why we don't immediately revoke the visas of anybody who advocates violence and/or intollerance.]]]

 

Seems at some point in your life you thought Sharia law was a problem and that "letting them do it" was our problem.

 

John Kerry called, he wants his act back.

 

So other people don't have the right to be intolerant but you do?

 

[Boz/BoFan 0]

So other people don't have the right to be intolerant but you do?

 

 

Awww, thats cute, he thought that post was about intolerance. Sorry little buddy. Id love to see your reading comprehension scores on the ACT....if you took it.

 

But to answer your logic defyingly incorrect interpretation of my previous post, yes, I am intolerant of an intolerant religion. Should we lock up killers? Or, is that intolerant?

[Sho Nuff 720]

Awww, thats cute, he thought that post was about intolerance. Sorry little buddy. Id love to see your reading comprehension scores on the ACT....if you took it.

 

But to answer your logic defyingly incorrect interpretation of my previous post, yes, I am intolerant of an intolerant religion. Should we lock up killers? Or, is that intolerant?

 

Look up again numbnuts...I bolded the exact portion of your rant that I commented on...here, since you are slow, I will pull out the whole quote separately for you.

 

For the life of me, I don't understand why we don't immediately revoke the visas of anybody who advocates violence and/or intollerance.

 

Now, how the hell else is that supposed to read if you were not talking about intolerance (since you said and/or)?

 

Perhaps its you who needs a few more courses in reading comprehension...actually, its quite obvious that you do given what you think the Quaran says.

 

Actually, it seems that you are just intolerant of people who believe differently than you...especially how you have shown to really not understand much about Islam as it is.

[Boz/BoFan 0]

Look up again numbnuts...I bolded the exact portion of your rant that I commented on...here, since you are slow, I will pull out the whole quote separately for you.

Now, how the hell else is that supposed to read if you were not talking about intolerance (since you said and/or)?

 

Perhaps its you who needs a few more courses in reading comprehension...actually, its quite obvious that you do given what you think the Quaran says.

 

Actually, it seems that you are just intolerant of people who believe differently than you...especially how you have shown to really not understand much about Islam as it is.

 

That was Waffleboys quote dumb sh!t. I over bracketed his statement beginning with [[[ and ending with ]]] so tards like you wouldnt get confused. Maybe I'll use {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ and }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] next time to make it a bit more clear.

 

You may now return to your mum's teet.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

That was Waffleboys quote dumb sh!t. I over bracketed his statement beginning with [[[ and ending with ]]] so tards like you wouldnt get confused. Maybe I'll use {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ and }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] next time to make it a bit more clear.

 

You may now return to your mum's teet.

 

 

Ooops!

 

Let's see how he gets out of this one.

[Sho Nuff 720]

That was Waffleboys quote dumb sh!t. I over bracketed his statement beginning with [[[ and ending with ]]] so tards like you wouldnt get confused. Maybe I'll use {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ and }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] next time to make it a bit more clear.

 

You may now return to your mum's teet.

 

Maybe you should use the quote function...rather than whatever the hell that was you tried doing.

Or simple " " would work as well.

 

Instead, you did the dumbest thing I have ever seen someone try on the board (and thats saying alot with people like GFIAFP and edjr around).

[Sho Nuff 720]

Ooops!

 

Let's see how he gets out of this one.

 

No need to...unlike you I can admit when I was wrong. I was wrong about who posted it...

 

Though, glad you could chime in with all this substance...forget to log in as Angry White Male?

[Boz/BoFan 0]

Maybe you should use the quote function...rather than whatever the hell that was you tried doing.

Or simple " " would work as well.

 

Instead, you did the dumbest thing I have ever seen someone try on the board (and thats saying alot with people like GFIAFP and edjr around).

 

Sure, blame your stupidity on me, no way you're not a flaming liberal.....having zero accountability is their hallmark. Everyone else understood, why dont you move up to the front of the class so you're not so distracted mkay?

 

Look, you blew it, if you dont think I wasnt totally prepared for that then.......well ya know.

[Angry White Male 0]

Maybe you should use the quote function...rather than whatever the hell that was you tried doing.

Or simple " " would work as well.

 

Instead, you did the dumbest thing I have ever seen someone try on the board (and thats saying alot with people like GFIAFP and edjr around).

Nice backpedal

[Angry White Male 0]

Waffle much Waffleboy? And I quote.....

wiffleball Jul 2 2007, 06:16 PM

 

[[[it's generally not the Quaran, but the teachings of Mohammed and others that advocate and justify violent conversion & strict adherence to & worldwide deference to, Sharia law that are the problem.

 

That's basically what the Pope tried to say, but the ragheads got so cry.gif about it, that the point was lost.

 

That's basically their tactic - cry.gif furiously for their rights while beating down & violently supressing the rights of anybody who disagrees with them.

 

...and we're letting them do it.

 

As for deporting all Muslims, I certainly disagree. However, immigration & visas are a privledge, not a right. Many of those preaching hatred in the UK and here are not citizens. For the life of me, I don't understand why we don't immediately revoke the visas of anybody who advocates violence and/or intollerance.]]]

 

Seems at some point in your life you thought Sharia law was a problem and that "letting them do it" was our problem.

 

John Kerry called, he wants his act back.

It's weird that folks like wiffleball and Sho Nuff that are nominally against the abuses and atrocities committed by extremist Muslims in the name of Islam engage in these arguments where they defend Muslims in general. I guess liberals just love to hate America.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Sure, blame your stupidity on me, no way you're not a flaming liberal.....having zero accountability is their hallmark. Everyone else understood, why dont you move up to the front of the class so you're not so distracted mkay?

 

Look, you blew it, if you dont think I wasnt totally prepared for that then.......well ya know.

 

Read the next post...I stated I was wrong...but come on...talk about trying to weasel a bit...do you really think that was a good attempt at quoting someone? Seriously? are you that focking stupid that the quote function was too difficult for you to figure out?

[Sho Nuff 720]

It's weird that folks like wiffleball and Sho Nuff that are nominally against the abuses and atrocities committed by extremist Muslims in the name of Islam engage in these arguments where they defend Muslims in general. I guess liberals just love to hate America.

 

Ummm...I am against atrocities committed by the extremists. I engage in these arguments where people label all muslims bad and show they have a complete lack of knowledge on the subject (yes, that means you boz, you angry, you gocolts...and so on)

People that stretch an argument far beyond where the original topic showing how extremist their opinion is. Linking to things in canada and scotland to try and prove that Muslims are trying to force their beliefs on us here (especially funny when their links do not even show anyone trying to shove their beliefs on anyone else).

 

Your last point...ignorance at its finest.

Im not a liberal.

I don't hate america.

 

Somehow being rational makes me a liberal in your eye.

And somehow defending people from ignorant bashing makes me hate america to you.

 

Only real response to that...

[fastfish 0]

Reading over the posts in this thread brought to mind words spoken long ago but they might have been spoken today as we look ahead in the war with Islamic fascism...a war that will go on no matter how much we wish it would stop....a war for the survival of freedom everywhere because if America cannot prevail over this 12th century barbarism, all of civilization begins a new Dark Age.

-----------

"Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun. Our brethren are already in the field."

------------

 

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve....

 

This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country......

 

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty?

 

Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.......

 

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms!

 

Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

 

Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.

[edjr 6,608]

This thread is a good read

[porkbutt 893]

fastfish was a badass

[IMMensaMind 462]

Why do you fat assed republitards need to eat at your desk anyways. Why don't you go out and get some exercise or enjoy a little fresh air with the liberals. You might as well enjoy the day a little, before you go home to your 30-40 something year old thunder thighed wives and meatloaf.

 

Reposted for the 10 year later self-fulfilled lulz.

[edjr 6,608]

fastfish was a badass

 

Greatly missed