Legislatures May Act on Columbia

[Cdub100 3,909]

Wrong. I never said Columbia should not be allowed to make the choice, I specifically stated " its totally their call" and a call i didnt agree with. My point is if they decided not to allow him to speak it wouldnt be a free speech issue, it would have been...much like the GQ article, just another decision.

 

The GQ situation has an extortion angle though, which is an entirely different topic that warrants discussion.

 

I'm sorry, but you're not making any sense, he was invited to speak so why wouldn't they let him speak. I have no idea what you're talking about here or your murder example or why you would bring up the Clinton's. Extortion? WTF are we talking about

[Boz/BoFan 0]

I'm sorry, but you're not making any sense, he was invited to speak so why wouldn't they let him speak. I have no idea what you're talking about here or your murder example or why you would bring up the Clinton's. Extortion? WTF are we talking about

 

Nobody ever accused you of being bright.

[buffalobillsffl2003 0]

Typical jew shakedown.

 

columbia univ. in jew york shitty wants to hold itself as some bastion/champion of the first amendment, and this kraut-kike bollinger acts like a petulant baby towards amenajahd (sp).

 

the iranian guy has a PhD. and can speak five different languages. says more than for the crayon-drawing retard currently inhabiting 1600 pennsylvania ave.

 

[Snoopy1 0]

Link to said "ass-kicking"? So far I see no link to a "loyalty oath".

 

loyalty oath

[Evil number 0]

loyalty oath

 

But it does'nt say loyalty oath on the form so RP will still own everyone.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

loyalty oath

 

 

A "loyalty oath" without the words "loyalty" or "oath" in it. Cool.

[Snoopy1 0]

A "loyalty oath" without the words "loyalty" or "oath" in it. Cool.

 

 

Nobody ever claimed it had the words "loyalty" or "oath" in it. Please show where the words "loyalty" or "oath" have to be present on such a document. Wording could be "swear" "promise" or "endorse" and it still is in fact a loyalty oath.

 

The articles that several geeks mentioned were referencing this document.

 

Of course everyone knew when this was produced you would start spinning like a tornado.

[hoytdwow 202]

I still don't understand why Columbia invited him, and then the President of Columbia ridiculed and insulted him.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Nobody ever claimed it had the words "loyalty" or "oath" in it. Please show where the words "loyalty" or "oath" have to be present on such a document. Wording could be "swear" "promise" or "endorse" and it still is in fact a loyalty oath.

 

The articles that several geeks mentioned were referencing this document.

 

Of course everyone knew when this was produced you would start spinning like a tornado.

 

 

Wiffleball made the original claim, even put "loyalty oath" in quotation marks.

 

Here ya go:

 

 

When George Bush speaks to his own citizens at a 'town hall' event like this, attendees have been required to sign a "loyalty oath" endorsing the President (or VP), promising to vote for him, prove that you are a registered Republican and/or promising not to criticize, boo, 'disrupt' or challenge the President in any way.

 

 

It seems Wiffle made a lot of other claims in that post that are not backed up by your link.

 

Thanks for playing.

[Snoopy1 0]

Wiffleball made the original claim, even put "loyalty oath" in quotation marks.

 

Here ya go:

When George Bush speaks to his own citizens at a 'town hall' event like this, attendees have been required to sign a "loyalty oath" endorsing the President (or VP), promising to vote for him, prove that you are a registered Republican and/or promising not to criticize, boo, 'disrupt' or challenge the President in any way.

It seems Wiffle made a lot of other claims in that post that are not backed up by your link.

 

Thanks for playing.

 

 

Keep spinning Torrid Pilot

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Keep spinning Torrid Pilot

 

No spin needed to make you look like an idiot. You claimed "loyalty oath" was not used, I showed you that it was.

 

If you like we can discuss the other lies Wiffleball spewed forth in his post, but I don't think you want to go there.

[Snoopy1 0]

No spin needed to make you look like an idiot. You claimed "loyalty oath" was not used, I showed you that it was.

 

If you like we can discuss the other lies Wiffleball spewed forth in his post, but I don't think you want to go there.

 

 

Wiffle used the term "loyalty oath" because that was what the document was called during the 2004 election. No where does he or anyone claim the words loyalty or oath were contained in such a document.

 

I never claimed the term "loyalty oath" wasn't used. Strange how you accuse wiffle of lying, but it's you who have been busted, Torrid.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

I never claimed the term "loyalty oath" wasn't used. Strange how you accuse wiffle of lying, but it's you who have been busted, Torrid.

 

 

Exactly how have I been busted?

[Snoopy1 0]

Exactly how have I been busted?

 

You claimed "loyalty oath" was not used, I showed you that it was.

 

I never made any such claim, you lied.

 

Keep spinning and distancing yourself from your original question asking for a link of said "loyalty oath". You've seen it, your denial that it is anything but only reinforces that you are nothing more then a board troll with absolutely nothing to contribute to actual discussions.

[Cdub100 3,909]

Nobody ever accused you of being bright.

 

Nobody ever accused you of knowing how to debate.

 

Cdub - I think the right to free speech should be extended to all people's of the world

 

Boz - Oh yeah well a blah blah murderer into your house blah blah blah

 

Cdub -

 

Boz - And also the Clinton's Blah blah blah GQ

 

Cdub -

 

Boz - Not only blah blah blah but extortion

 

Cdub -

 

Boz - Blah blah insult insult!

[footballpowers 0]

I am not sure why ANYONE would continue to converse w/ these idiots (Boz/butt, RP and gocolts *likes mens hairy butts). It is obvious they lie, twist the truth and dance around facts. We have plenty of posters from both sides of the political spectrum, why engage these idiots? You know they are nothing but cowardly aliases that aren't "man" enough to do anything but hide behind an alias.

[Boz/BoFan 0]

Nobody ever accused you of knowing how to debate.

 

Cdub - I think the right to free speech should be extended to all people's of the world

 

Boz - Oh yeah well a blah blah murderer into your house blah blah blah

 

Cdub -

 

Boz - And also the Clinton's Blah blah blah GQ

 

Cdub -

 

Boz - Not only blah blah blah but extortion

 

Cdub -

 

Boz - Blah blah insult insult!

 

 

Everyone else kept up. Have you tried Sylvan ?

[gocolts 300]

Nobody ever claimed it had the words "loyalty" or "oath" in it. Please show where the words "loyalty" or "oath" have to be present on such a document. Wording could be "swear" "promise" or "endorse" and it still is in fact a loyalty oath.

 

The articles that several geeks mentioned were referencing this document.

 

Of course everyone knew when this was produced you would start spinning like a tornado.

To quote one of your buddies, "selective interpretation".

[Recliner Pilot 61]

I never made any such claim, you lied.

 

Keep spinning and distancing yourself from your original question asking for a link of said "loyalty oath". You've seen it, your denial that it is anything but only reinforces that you are nothing more then a board troll with absolutely nothing to contribute to actual discussions.

\

 

LMFAO

 

You said nobody claimed "loyalty oath" was included in the loyalty oath. I showed you where Wiffle inlcuded loyalty oath in quotation marks. I guess you need to brush up on the use and meaning of quotation marks, Skippy.

 

Wiffle also claimed this so-called "loyalty oath" required them to "promise" to vote for him, "prove" you are a registered Republican, and "promise" not to "criticize, boo, disrupt, or challenge the President in any way".

 

Can you show me in your link where it addresses any of those subjects? I'll save you the embarrassement......it doesn't.

 

I guess my original question still stands: I'm still waiting for a link to some sort of "loyalty oath"......preferably one that requires all the other things Wiffle claims it requires.

 

Now, since you will be unable to provide such a link, or back up any of your BS you can now resort to saying I am "spinning" and such.......even though you have failed to answer my original question.

[itsbigmoni 1]

This is probably a stupid question, but how was he allowed into the country? Couldn't they have denied his visa or something?

[gocolts 300]

This is probably a stupid question, but how was he allowed into the country? Couldn't they have denied his visa or something?

You would think so. Bush looks very foolish right now. Sadly, It's a regular thing with him.

[Evil number 0]

This is probably a stupid question, but how was he allowed into the country? Couldn't they have denied his visa or something?

 

We had to allow him in because of agreements for the United Nations.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

We had to allow him in because of agreements for the United Nations.

 

 

Reason number 2 bajillion and 4 why the UN should be kicked the fock out of the U.S. never to get another dime of our tax money.

[MDC 7,435]

Keep spinning Torrid Pilot

 

Recliner Joe, destroyed yet again!

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Wiffle used the term "loyalty oath" because that was what the document was called during the 2004 election. No where does he or anyone claim the words loyalty or oath were contained in such a document.

 

Who called it that in 2004?

 

lol at you with your "loyalty oath" that never says "loyalty" or "oath".

[Snoopy1 0]

Who called it that in 2004?

 

lol at you with your "loyalty oath" that never says "loyalty" or "oath".

 

 

Keep spinning and distancing yourself from your original question asking for a link of said "loyalty oath". You've seen it, your denial that it is anything but only reinforces that you are nothing more then a board troll with absolutely nothing to contribute to actual discussions

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Keep spinning and distancing yourself from your original question asking for a link of said "loyalty oath". You've seen it, your denial that it is anything but only reinforces that you are nothing more then a board troll with absolutely nothing to contribute to actual discussions

 

Damn, did I call it or what? Nailed your sorry ass by predicting your lame-ass response of "Spin, spin spin.............".

 

Too focking funny.

 

I'm not distancing myself from my original question, chump. I'm still waiting for a link to a "loyalty oath", ya know one that requuires all the stuff Wiffle claims.......or at least uses an oath of loyalty.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

\

 

LMFAO

 

You said nobody claimed "loyalty oath" was included in the loyalty oath. I showed you where Wiffle inlcuded loyalty oath in quotation marks. I guess you need to brush up on the use and meaning of quotation marks, Skippy.

 

Wiffle also claimed this so-called "loyalty oath" required them to "promise" to vote for him, "prove" you are a registered Republican, and "promise" not to "criticize, boo, disrupt, or challenge the President in any way".

 

Can you show me in your link where it addresses any of those subjects? I'll save you the embarrassement......it doesn't.

 

I guess my original question still stands: I'm still waiting for a link to some sort of "loyalty oath"......preferably one that requires all the other things Wiffle claims it requires.

 

Now, since you will be unable to provide such a link, or back up any of your BS you can now resort to saying I am "spinning" and such.......even though you have failed to answer my original question.

 

Bump so Snoopy can show me where these claims are addressed in his link.

[Snoopy1 0]

Keep spinning and distancing yourself from your original question asking for a link of said "loyalty oath". You've seen it, your denial that it is anything but only reinforces that you are nothing more then a board troll with absolutely nothing to contribute to actual discussions

[Recliner Pilot 61]

You really should quit while you're waaaaaaaaaaay behind.

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=290812

[MDC 7,435]

Recliner Joe destroyed AGAIN - what a focking douche!