JoeBoxers43 0 Posted November 23, 2007 He didn't come out of the game injured. Why hasn't he practiced all week, and what happened in Holmgren's presser, I believe he was supposed to mention something about that. Any updates would be appreciated, thank you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NotAClue 0 Posted November 23, 2007 sorry to hijack, but what do you guys think about Branch if Hackett is limited/out. Hackett also was slow his first week back much like Branch last week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hotgumbo1 12 Posted November 23, 2007 sorry to hijack, but what do you guys think about Branch if Hackett is limited/out. Hackett also was slow his first week back much like Branch last week. please tell me you are an idiot. slow once hackett returned? he's matched Chad Johnson's output in almost two months. and since returning has probably been the best WR without the last name Moss or Owens. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cortezthekiller303 0 Posted November 23, 2007 sorry to hijack, but what do you guys think about Branch if Hackett is limited/out. Hackett also was slow his first week back much like Branch last week. Its ironic in a way that you start a thread about how this place has gone to hell and people need to be bannored, but then it turns out you are one of the fvckheads that makes this bored suck. Wrong bored. Take it to the help bored. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
larrymcirish 0 Posted November 23, 2007 rototimes.com says d.j. has not practiced for 2 days due to a sore knee. "we'll wait to see what the seahawks say after friday's practice". i got him & didn't know he was hurt. duh!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cortezthekiller303 0 Posted November 23, 2007 He didn't come out of the game injured. Why hasn't he practiced all week, and what happened in Holmgren's presser, I believe he was supposed to mention something about that. Any updates would be appreciated, thank you. I dont know if I would sweat it. A quick scan of the Seattle papers show nothing of any significance regarding hackett's health, and in all fairness, Hassleback didnt practice all week either. I think its a case of just taking it easy as the season progresses. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Law 220 Posted November 23, 2007 Wrong bored. Take it to the help bored. Exactly what is needed to be taken to Help Board? The thread is about Hackett. So someone asked what impact Hackett, one Seattle WR, will have on the return of Branch, another Seattle WR. Soooo, asking how the interaction of Branch and Hackett plays out makes someone an idiot? Is enough to call someone a forkhead and call for a banning? Logical progression questions like this within a thread make the board suck? This question about the two Seattle WRs and how they effect each other should be on the Help Board? Exactly who are the idiots here that make this board suck? Going forward, I see Branch returning as the possession guy who racks up the catches in PPR leagues, but it will be Hackett who gets the TDs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R8RMick 242 Posted November 24, 2007 I watched Holmgen give weekly jibba-jabba reports on DJax when he was hurt two years ago. I swore I'd never rely on any word from him regarding a Seahawk injury ever again. My advice is to keep an option open and check back Sunday AM for the inactives. Sorry, I know that's not much, but you asked... BTW, my guess, based on the Friday Rotoworld report, is that he plays. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Four More Beers 0 Posted November 24, 2007 Yeah, "practiced with first team offense on Friday" seemed like a go to me too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NotAClue 0 Posted November 24, 2007 please tell me you are an idiot.slow once hackett returned? he's matched Chad Johnson's output in almost two months. and since returning has probably been the best WR without the last name Moss or Owens. I don't see why instead of just discussing it or providing some evidence, this board insists on resorting to insults to get their "point" across. At any rate, here are hackett's numbers since his return: Game Opp Rec Yards TD FF Points 9 @Cle 6 58 1 8 10 SF 8 101 1 12 11 Chi 9 136 1 13 Hackett's remarks after his first game back: D.J. Hackett said afterward that "conditioning" limited his workload in Week 9.Hackett was on the sidelines for most of the late stages of the game, but apparently was merely tired rather than injured. "I've still got a ways to go," Hackett said. "Conditioning was the main thing." He had six catches for 58 yards while playing for the first time since Week 1. Now here are Branch's numbers: Game Opp Rec Yards TD FF Points 11 Chi 4 31 0 1 Admittedly Hackett got a TD in game 9, but he didn't really blow up until the next game. Similarly, Branch could need a week to get back to the form he had in week 2 and week 3. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hotgumbo1 12 Posted November 24, 2007 I don't see why instead of just discussing it or providing some evidence, this board insists on resorting to insults to get their "point" across. At any rate, here are hackett's numbers since his return: Game Opp Rec Yards TD FF Points 9 @Cle 6 58 1 8 10 SF 8 101 1 12 11 Chi 9 136 1 13 Hackett's remarks after his first game back: Now here are Branch's numbers: Game Opp Rec Yards TD FF Points 11 Chi 4 31 0 1 Admittedly Hackett got a TD in game 9, but he didn't really blow up until the next game. Similarly, Branch could need a week to get back to the form he had in week 2 and week 3. hey dork...i beleive you stated hackett started off slow. You know what the definition of slow is? How bout maybe something like 2 catches for 10 yards. 6 catches for 58 and 1 score is hot for a player injured since Week 1 with question marks bigger than Redskin lineman. Most WR would dream to have 6 catches their first game back. Wont even mention how many targets Hackett got that game. He started off with a bang more like it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mephisto 15 Posted November 24, 2007 hey dork...i beleive you stated hackett started off slow. You know what the definition of slow is? How bout maybe something like 2 catches for 10 yards. 6 catches for 58 and 1 score is hot for a player injured since Week 1 with question marks bigger than Redskin lineman. Most WR would dream to have 6 catches their first game back. Wont even mention how many targets Hackett got that game. He started off with a bang more like it. Amen, brutha. His is the #3 WR in my league in the last 3 weeks behind only Owens and Moss. That's red focking hot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Niners_fan 0 Posted November 24, 2007 Hackett returns to practice, but questionable D.J. Hackett (questionable, knee) returned to Seahawks practice Friday. Despite the "questionable" listing, Hackett reportedly ran his routes crisply in practice. Hackett didn't work on Wednesday or Thursday because of minor swelling in his knee, but doesn't appear to be in much danger of sitting out against St. Louis. Still, check the Sunday AM inactives to be safe. Nov. 23 - 5:32 pm et Source: Seahawks Insider Blog Hopefully D.J. will play. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DocNiner 44 Posted November 24, 2007 Hope the hell he is a go for Sunday. I put him in as my 2nd starting receiver(we only start 2 and only carry 4 wr's on our rosters) over Greg Jennings. Of course Jennings score two td's Seattle may end up throwing the ball more than the Packers.Even though Jennings scored 2 td's I'd be happy if Hackett got 80 yds.and a score. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
