***Official Week 7 College Betting Thread***

[phillybear 366]

Clemson 52% of the action over Wake Forest

Houston 54% of the action over UAB

 

No trap games tonight. Unusually even action. No betting public plays. Nothing.

 

Just simply pick a winner on the spread by merit, which makes it even harder.

[big easy 0]

Clemson 52% of the action over Wake Forest

Houston 54% of the action over UAB

 

No trap games tonight. Unusually even action. No betting public plays. Nothing.

 

Just simply pick a winner on the spread by merit, which makes it even harder.

 

I'm assuming that $epphori$ is saying that Clemson is the public choice because of the line movement. It is down to -1.5 from -2.5 at most of my the books that I play with.

[$epphori$ 118]

East Carolina +5

Minny +12.5

West Mich +2

Notre Dame +7.5

each for 5 Units

 

...........................................

 

Tulane +5

Ball St. -16

TCU -14.5

 

10 unit plays

 

Putting my $$ where my mouth is and taking Wake -1.5 for 20 Units

 

GL

 

locked and played

[$epphori$ 118]

I'm assuming that $epphori$ is saying that Clemson is the public choice because of the line movement. It is down to -1.5 from -2.5 at most of my the books that I play with.

 

Bro to be honest I never looked at the public side, when I made that statement I was talkn about the posts in the thread...and I said it as a joke....but I am telling you I feel Wake is underestimated, they beat FAU in Florida, who has Clemson beatn? I am laying the pts...and that is my final answer

[Grind 0]

My thoughts for the weekend. Not sure I like being a part of this many "big games", but what the heck...

 

Mississippi State (+2.5) – This is a pure human psychology lean. Vandy coming off a big win over Auburn (who I think is always over-rated) having to hit the road the following week as favorites. I think the line opened at 1 and moved to 2.5 currently while the public rides the Vandy Choo Choo Train. Well not so fast.

 

Georgia (-12) – At home following a loss and off a bye, I’m thinking Georgia is ready to roll. Not too long ago, Georgia was the #1 ranked team in the country. They have far more talent in this game.

 

Oklahoma (-7) – Just don’t think Texas schedule has helped them prepare for this game.

 

West Virginia (-24) – Syracuse bad. Syracuse very bad.

 

LSU (+6) - I think LSU has a chance to win. If not win, then getting six seems good. My gut is telling me that the best percentage play is getting the points (especially when more then 3) in such a close matchup.

[swirvenirvin 25]

Taking the under in tonight game not sure what my book will give me, but still going under

[phillybear 366]

I'm assuming that $epphori$ is saying that Clemson is the public choice because of the line movement. It is down to -1.5 from -2.5 at most of my the books that I play with.

 

I can see your point. But it's not that significant of a move.

 

The line is moving between key numbers, but not passing a key number. A move between -2.5 and +2.5 in either direction doesn't bother me much. Once it passes 3,4,6,7,10,14,17,21 etc, then I start scratching my head. The -2.5 to -1.5 might be the books simply trying to get 50/50 action on the game, as they can't figure who the hell is going to win just like me, and they are actually trying to get even action. Rare, very rare. The mythical, magical, nearly nonexistant balanced action game.

[Grind 0]

locked and played

 

 

I'm assuming you have East Carolina at -5 (not +5). The only reason I noticed is because I had considered Virginia although at this point I am passing on the game.

[$epphori$ 118]

I'm assuming you have East Carolina at -5 (not +5). The only reason I noticed is because I had considered Virginia although at this point I am passing on the game.

 

wow..thanx for catching that..yes u r correct in ECU being -5

[$epphori$ 118]

Clemson is 5-2 ATS as ACC road underdog. Wake Forest is 12-4-2 against the spread versus Clemson. The Demon Deacons are 13-3 ATS facing Atlantic Division squads, though 7-16-1 ATS as ACC home favorites. Trends aside, I believe the Deacons take the cake in this one. Leading the ACC in passing, and coming off an embarrassing Home loss I believe they come into this game more focused and ready to play. In my opinion Clemson has proven ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to me this season. Walk with me on a trip down memory lane. Clemson opened the season with a neutral site embarrassment to Alabama 34-10.(I will admit, Alabama is a great team this year), but let's continue on this journey. I keep hearing about how they "bounced back" and won their next 3 games. But who did they play?? Let me show you who they played.

 

ALL HOME GAMES I MAY ADD:

Week 2- Clemson hosts a DI-aa school, The Citadel. They win 45-17. There was no line on this game. Allowed 17 points??

 

Week 3- Clemson hosts NC State. They get the SU Win 29-7. ATS Loss. Again, NCST is 2-4 this season with only 1 credible win against Ecarolina. Other win was against a DI-aa school, WILMA(who the hell is Wilma??)

 

Week 4- Clemson hosts another DI-aa school, South Carolina St. They win 54-0. Again, no line on this game.

 

Week 5- Clemson hosts Maryland (a Sub-par at best team this season) and Lose 17-20. Also a Loss ATS.

 

If you can find 1 thing on that list that gives them ANY credibilty at all please tell me......................................Don't worry, I'll wait...........

 

Now they are on the Road for the first time this season against a team that should probably be undefeated coming into this game. Yes they lost to Navy which looks bad, but it was a fluke game. I mean really?? They come off of 3 wins..At Baylor 41-13, host Ole miss 30-28, and At Florida State 12-3. Sure, they didnt pound anyone in the ground, but look at the comparison of opponents. Skinner went into the Navy game having thrown 133 straight passes without an INT against some damn good opponents. He throws 4 INTS last week, and loses a Fumble. That is the definition of a Fluke. VERY unlikely that happens again. In all they had 6 Turnovers, and lost by only 1 TD. In my opinion, this recent breakdown will not hold any consistency. I'm probably rambling here, but I just cannot see Clemson getting anything done on the road when they cant even get it done at home(unless playing a DI-AA team). Additionally, Clemson is 0-3 ATS this season, Wake is 2-2 ATS(not great, but not a goose egg either.)Traditionally, Wake Forest holds the edge ATS against Clemson at 10-6 since 1992.

 

Situational Factors:

Play Against - All teams where the line is +3 to -3 (CLEMSON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against the spread, good team, winning 60-80% or more of their games on the season.

(76-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%)

Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (45-25).

 

WAKE FOREST is 11-3 ATS when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.

WAKE FOREST is 8-1 ATS when the line is +3 to -3 over the last 3 seasons.

Bowden is 2-10 ATS after 3 or more consecutive losses against the spread as the coach of CLEMSON.

[big easy 0]

I can see your point. But it's not that significant of a move.

 

The line is moving between key numbers, but not passing a key number. A move between -2.5 and +2.5 in either direction doesn't bother me much. Once it passes 3,4,6,7,10,14,17,21 etc, then I start scratching my head. The -2.5 to -1.5 might be the books simply trying to get 50/50 action on the game, as they can't figure who the hell is going to win just like me, and they are actually trying to get even action. Rare, very rare. The mythical, magical, nearly nonexistant balanced action game.

 

Agreed, Philly.

 

$epphori$, I like the fact that you are putting your money where your mouth is and for 20 units to boot. It takes cajunas to make that large of a play on a game that is deemed to have two pretty evenly matched conference teams facing off.

[$epphori$ 118]

Agreed, Philly.

 

$epphori$, I like the fact that you are putting your money where your mouth is and for 20 units to boot. It takes cajunas to make that large of a play on a game that is deemed to have two pretty evenly matched conference teams facing off.

 

20 units = $200

 

no big deal

 

my friend they are NOT evenly matched....the line should be higher, Wake is a better team, much better

[phillybear 366]

NCAA YTD: 46-36-5; +23.45 units

CFL YTD: 9-11-1; -5.7 units

NFL YTD: 22-14-1; +13.9 units

 

Thursday

 

Adding: Cle/WF UNDER (42.5) for 3 units WINNER

 

Adding: OVER UAB/HOU (67.5) for 2 units LOSER

Houston (-18) for 3 units WINNER

 

 

I like taking a game that is a statistical mismatch. If all things are equal, such as penalties and turnovers, then the mismatch should produce a mismatched result.

 

Houston averages 545 yards per game.

Houston allows 406 yards per game.

UAB averages 387 yards per game.

UAB allows 461 yards per game.

 

I'll save you the trouble of doing the math. That's 203 total yards of difference per game on average. That should translate to a cover just by itself. UAB lost last year at home to Houston 49-10, and there really isn't much difference from last year to this year. Houston has outstatted 4 of their 5 opponents, generally leading to an impression an underrated team, considering they are 2-3. They had issues with hurricanes earlier this year, having a game moved to another venue, and letting it affect them in the following game too. Finally, putting the distractions behind them, they upset East Carolina 41-24 in their last outing, and is coming off a bye. This is a team that is probably ascending, considering the 3 game losing streak of getting punched out by Oklahoma St, then losing a pair of 3 pt games to Air Force and Colorado St, a pair of MWC teams, a far, far superior conference than the talent challenged Conf USA. Beating East Carolina is a sign that the team is finally playing up to their potential.

 

UAB is something like 0-17 SU last 17 road games, 0-3 on the road this year, losing to Fla Atl 49-34, Tenn 35-3, and So Car 26-13. Fla Atl is not good as we have seen the last two weeks, Tenn never blows out anybody but did here, and I'm still startled that So Car couldn't find any offense in their matchup, despite how bad So Car offense is. The last game for UAB was a home loss to an awful, awful, awful, overrated Memphis team 33-30, in a game that went back and forth. I'm not impressed with their resume at all. Also, you can probably guess which way I am leaning for tomorrow night's game.

 

Basically, there is no reason that Houston can't score on every possession. It's a fine line to walk to lay 18 points in a game that could become a shootout, but if Houston can occasionally slow down the running/passing threat of the UAB QB, then Houston can win by 30+ points. Lay the lumber.

 

Good luck to all.

[big easy 0]

20 units = $200

 

no big deal

 

my friend they are NOT evenly matched....the line should be higher, Wake is a better team, much better

 

 

I see what you are saying with the unit size. Your 20=2 for me. Looks like we have the same action then, just different sides. I would say good luck, but I wouldn't mean it.

 

If you think that Wake is a much better team, you are the one that needs to wake up my friend. I hated to steal your line, but I just couldn't help myself.

[$epphori$ 118]

I see what you are saying with the unit size. Your 20=2 for me. Looks like we have the same action then, just different sides. I would say good luck, but I wouldn't mean it.

 

If you think that Wake is a much better team, you are the one that needs to wake up my friend. I hated to steal your line, but I just couldn't help myself.

 

Hey man I like u, ur a good dude, so I will post it for you once again....

 

ALL HOME GAMES I MAY ADD:

Week 2- Clemson hosts a DI-aa school, The Citadel. They win 45-17. There was no line on this game. Allowed 17 points??

 

Week 3- Clemson hosts NC State. They get the SU Win 29-7. ATS Loss. Again, NCST is 2-4 this season with only 1 credible win against Ecarolina. Other win was against a DI-aa school, WILMA(who the hell is Wilma??)

 

Week 4- Clemson hosts another DI-aa school, South Carolina St. They win 54-0. Again, no line on this game.

 

Week 5- Clemson hosts Maryland (a Sub-par at best team this season) and Lose 17-20. Also a Loss ATS.

 

If you can find 1 thing on that list that gives them ANY credibilty at all please tell me......................................Don't worry, I'll wait...........

 

Now they are on the Road for the first time this season against a team that should probably be undefeated coming into this game. Yes they lost to Navy which looks bad, but it was a fluke game. I mean really?? They come off of 3 wins..At Baylor 41-13, host Ole miss 30-28, and At Florida State 12-3. Sure, they didnt pound anyone in the ground, but look at the comparison of opponents. Skinner went into the Navy game having thrown 133 straight passes without an INT against some damn good opponents. He throws 4 INTS last week, and loses a Fumble. That is the definition of a Fluke. VERY unlikely that happens again. In all they had 6 Turnovers, and lost by only 1 TD. In my opinion, this recent breakdown will not hold any consistency. I'm probably rambling here, but I just cannot see Clemson getting anything done on the road when they cant even get it done at home(unless playing a DI-AA team). Additionally, Clemson is 0-3 ATS this season, Wake is 2-2 ATS(not great, but not a goose egg either.)Traditionally, Wake Forest holds the edge ATS against Clemson at 10-6 since 1992.

[dmaidlow73 0]

Hey man I like u, ur a good dude, so I will post it for you once again....

 

ALL HOME GAMES I MAY ADD:

Week 2- Clemson hosts a DI-aa school, The Citadel. They win 45-17. There was no line on this game. Allowed 17 points??

 

Week 3- Clemson hosts NC State. They get the SU Win 29-7. ATS Loss. Again, NCST is 2-4 this season with only 1 credible win against Ecarolina. Other win was against a DI-aa school, WILMA(who the hell is Wilma??)

 

Week 4- Clemson hosts another DI-aa school, South Carolina St. They win 54-0. Again, no line on this game.

 

Week 5- Clemson hosts Maryland (a Sub-par at best team this season) and Lose 17-20. Also a Loss ATS.

 

If you can find 1 thing on that list that gives them ANY credibilty at all please tell me......................................Don't worry, I'll wait...........

 

Now they are on the Road for the first time this season against a team that should probably be undefeated coming into this game. Yes they lost to Navy which looks bad, but it was a fluke game. I mean really?? They come off of 3 wins..At Baylor 41-13, host Ole miss 30-28, and At Florida State 12-3. Sure, they didnt pound anyone in the ground, but look at the comparison of opponents. Skinner went into the Navy game having thrown 133 straight passes without an INT against some damn good opponents. He throws 4 INTS last week, and loses a Fumble. That is the definition of a Fluke. VERY unlikely that happens again. In all they had 6 Turnovers, and lost by only 1 TD. In my opinion, this recent breakdown will not hold any consistency. I'm probably rambling here, but I just cannot see Clemson getting anything done on the road when they cant even get it done at home(unless playing a DI-AA team). Additionally, Clemson is 0-3 ATS this season, Wake is 2-2 ATS(not great, but not a goose egg either.)Traditionally, Wake Forest holds the edge ATS against Clemson at 10-6 since 1992.

 

Sepphori$: Are you Randizzle, or are you just using his posts?

[phillybear 366]

20 units = $200

 

no big deal

 

my friend they are NOT evenly matched....the line should be higher, Wake is a better team, much better

 

I have to admit, I was curious, what your unit was worth. 10 bucks, 100 bucks, 1000 bucks, etc.

 

**********************************************

 

If anyone cares, for the record and as I've stated in the past, my units in betting College Football, NFL, AFL, CFL 1 unit = 100 bucks. I usually stick to 1,2,3 units, with an occassional 5 or 7 unit game or so.

 

I vary what my unit is equal to in other sports like baseball, basketball, etc. Sometimes a unit is equal to a 100, some weeks, the unit amount drops to 50 bucks a unit. There are so many games, and every night, you almost have to scale back units. I may or may not post baskets at the Geek Bored this year. Those threads are fun, but not very active.

 

I like the Phillies tonight for 3 units. WINNER

 

Edit: it's nice to have a day off from work, so I can actually post a little bit in this thread, more than a sentence or two.

[ToledoLurch 0]

$eph has me convinced...

 

NCAA 33-29-3 up 10.1 units

 

Wake -1.5 for 2.5 units - winner

UAB/Hou under 67.5 for 4 units - winner

 

 

good luck all!!!

 

I am also jumping on the Dodgers...In Manny I trust!!!

[new-guru 0]

Philly and Ephori whats thoughts on over/ under tonight

I like WF under and Huston over

 

I woull relly like to hear ur thoughts.

 

Go Wake

[big easy 0]

I have to admit, I was curious, what your unit was worth. 10 bucks, 100 bucks, 1000 bucks, etc.

 

**********************************************

 

If anyone cares, for the record and as I've stated in the past, my units in betting College Football, NFL, AFL, CFL 1 unit = 100 bucks. I usually stick to 1,2,3 units, with an occassional 5 or 7 unit game or so.

 

I vary what my unit is equal to in other sports like baseball, basketball, etc. Sometimes a unit is equal to a 100, some weeks, the unit amount drops to 50 bucks a unit. There are so many games, and every night, you almost have to scale back units. I may or may not post baskets at the Geek Bored this year. Those threads are fun, but not very active.

 

I like the Phillies tonight for 3 units.

 

Edit: it's nice to have a day off from work, so I can actually post a little bit in this thread, more than a sentence or two.

 

Our units and regular plays are exactly the same including a step out every once in a while.

[phillybear 366]

Philly and Ephori whats thoughts on over/ under tonight

I like WF under and Huston over

 

I woull relly like to hear ur thoughts.

 

Go Wake

 

I would lean to over UAB/Hou, and no opinion on Cle/WF. I don't do many over/uinders in college on principle. In the NFL, at least the games come close to the total number posted. In college, more often than not, you will see games go over or under the total by double digits. With the new rule changes, there is an overall perception that the unders are coming in. But I can see Houston going up and down the field. As long as neither team in that game has to settle for too many FG attempts, I suspect the game might go over. I might revisit the O/U at halftime, and conceivable make a play. Depending on how much alcohol I've consumed. Sh!t. I hate that Cle/WF game. I don't feel like making a play on that game, but I'm still looking over some stats.

[phillybear 366]

I locked in a play that I really like for Saturday just now.

 

Oklahoma St (+14) for 5 units

 

I'll do my best to post a writeup either tonight, tomorrow, or Saturday morning, as this game goes off Sat Night. But I don't need Dr Bob or some other service to come out with a big play on this game without having locked in a good line. A dog that has a very good chance to win this game outright, catching 2 TDs. LOVE THIS GAME.

 

Edit: I might still bump this to a 7 unit play.

[JetsFan28 0]

I may or may not post baskets at the Geek Bored this year. Those threads are fun, but not very active.

 

Gotta love baskets..the thread will be nice and active this year don't you worry.

[phillybear 366]

Gotta love baskets..the thread will be nice and active this year don't you worry.

 

The worst part of those threads are when a certain person drops by to give the posters grief over a losing day. That fucko can't quote a post correctly, but found the Geek Bored anyway despite his retarded computer skills.

[JetsFan28 0]

The worst part of those threads are when a certain person drops by to give the posters grief over a losing day. That fucko can't quote a post correctly, but found the Geek Bored anyway despite his retarded computer skills.

I think I just may know you're talkin about. My advice? Don't answer the haters. But I'm sure you've already been told that.

[big easy 0]

Just a heads up to people that have been sniffing a play on tonight's Clemson/Wake Forest game and have not acted yet, the line is now at a pick. If you liked Wake at -2.5, now might be the time to jump on it.

 

I tailed you with the Houston pick, Philly. All I had to see was the number 49. That is what Florida Atlantic hung on UAB. If that anemic offense can score that amount points on UAB, then who knows what the Cougars might do to them. They put up 41 on the road to a pretty tough East Carolina team in their last outing.

 

Houston -18 1 unit WIN

[phillybear 366]

Clemson is a -1.5 favorite at this moment. The line is shifting huge.

 

As most veteran bettors know, WF is a great ATS underdog under their current coach, and suck as a favorite. The dynamics have completely changed. WF might be the right side. More research to come.

 

I'm satisfied with Ok St with +14 for 5 units. Let's see if Dr Bob moves lines by 2 to 3 again, and if this game moves too. I feel like I just beat a deadline.

[phillybear 366]

I think I just may know you're talkin about. My advice? Don't answer the haters. But I'm sure you've already been told that.

 

Of course greyhounds drives me nuts. He is the opposite of a smart gambler. He is just...wrong. Fock. I knew when I was in trouble when I spent a long post correcting his math abilities, and he completely ignored my advice. He would be the worst cashier ever.

 

I finally came to the conclusion earlier this year that karma and the football gods would help me beat greyhounds and his folly. KARMA. So I'll keep posting, win or lose. Because it's enjoyable.

 

Still waiting on that guy to accept my challenge of 5 picks a week for several weeks, loser leaves the threads forever. Stilll waiting...

[phillybear 366]

Update:

 

Clemson seeing 55% of the action over Wake Forest

Houston seeing 57% of the action over UAB

 

And surprisingly, Clemson is now the favorite.

[listen2me 23 1,952]

Still waiting on that guy to accept my challenge of 5 picks a week for several weeks, loser leaves the threads forever. Stilll waiting...

 

Some of us should do this anyway. And keep the %. Doesn't have to be all plays, but your 5 most confident picks for the week.

 

Bragging rights for next year. See who knows their stuff and who doesn't.

[IAMWood 6]

I locked in a play that I really like for Saturday just now.

 

Oklahoma St (+14) for 5 units

 

I'll do my best to post a writeup either tonight, tomorrow, or Saturday morning, as this game goes off Sat Night. But I don't need Dr Bob or some other service to come out with a big play on this game without having locked in a good line. A dog that has a very good chance to win this game outright, catching 2 TDs. LOVE THIS GAME.

 

Edit: I might still bump this to a 7 unit play.

 

I have not seen Oklahoma State play yet. Missouri offense does look unstoppable. Not so sure about okie st. I am not touching this one, when in doubt take the points, but Missouri will definitely score enough to cover. Depends on mizzou d and okst o. GL. I wouldn't touch it.

 

 

[phillybear 366]

I have not seen Oklahoma State play yet. Missouri offense does look unstoppable. Not so sure about okie st. I am not touching this one, when in doubt take the points, but Missouri will definitely score enough to cover. Depends on mizzou d and okst o. GL. I wouldn't touch it.

 

No worries. It's a roll of the dice, of course. I have an incredible amount of confidence in the Ok St offense. I realize that Missouri has had it's ups and downs facing good offenses, struggling with Illinois and Buffalo, as recent examples. The OK ST offense is better than those two units. This is where we find out how good Ok St offense really is. And I think they are damn good.

 

Shootout. Taking a +14 gamble on being on the right side. Hell, I have a lot of respect for Houston and Troy, and Ok St blew out both of those teams. Missouri's schedule has been full of teams with horrible defenses. Did I mention shootout? If turnovers are even, I like my chances.

[The.Damned 0]

WSEX line has never left Wake -2.5

[phillybear 366]

Adding Over UAB/Hou (67.5) for 2 units LOSER

 

Still searching to see if I'm playing the WF/Cle game.

 

UAB/Hou game is on digital cable this week. Probably Direct TV as well.

[JetsFan28 0]

Adding Over UAB/Hou (67.5) for 2 units

 

Looks like we agree tonight on at least one play. Let's get em.

[phillybear 366]

Adding Cle/WF UNDER (42.5) for 3 units WINNER

[PackYourNut 47]

No worries. It's a roll of the dice, of course. I have an incredible amount of confidence in the Ok St offense. I realize that Missouri has had it's ups and downs facing good offenses, struggling with Illinois and Buffalo, as recent examples. The OK ST offense is better than those two units. This is where we find out how good Ok St offense really is. And I think they are damn good.

 

Shootout. Taking a +14 gamble on being on the right side. Hell, I have a lot of respect for Houston and Troy, and Ok St blew out both of those teams. Missouri's schedule has been full of teams with horrible defenses. Did I mention shootout? If turnovers are even, I like my chances.

 

I love OK St here... In fact, I expect the team who has the ball last will win. Both offenses are unstoppable at this point!

[phillybear 366]

For those that want them...

 

Dr Bob (17-6-2 YTD)

 

3 stars: Kansas St, North Carolina, Oregon

2 stars: South Carolina, Arkansas St

[big easy 0]

WSEX line has never left Wake -2.5

 

Not true, Damned.

 

WSEX Odds (Line) Over/Under (Total)

10/07/08 3:16:31 PM -2.5/-110 (Open) 44 -110 (Open)

10/07/08 5:06:31 PM -2/-110 44 -110

10/08/08 1:01:31 AM -2.5/-110 44 -110

10/08/08 1:36:31 PM -2.5/-110 43.5 -110

10/09/08 11:36:31 AM -2/-110 43.5 -110

10/09/08 11:56:31 AM -1.5/-110 43 -110

10/09/08 12:26:31 PM -1.5/-110 42.5 -110

10/09/08 4:46:31 PM 0/-110 42.5 -110

10/09/08 5:31:31 PM 1/-110 42.5 -110

10/09/08 6:06:32 PM 1/-110 42 -110

10/09/08 6:56:31 PM 1.5/-110 42 -110

10/09/08 7:21:31 PM 1.5/-110 42.5 -110

 

WSEX went from Wake -2.5 to Wake +1.5.

[The.Damned 0]

Not true, Damned.

 

WSEX Odds (Line) Over/Under (Total)

10/07/08 3:16:31 PM -2.5/-110 (Open) 44 -110 (Open)

10/07/08 5:06:31 PM -2/-110 44 -110

10/08/08 1:01:31 AM -2.5/-110 44 -110

10/08/08 1:36:31 PM -2.5/-110 43.5 -110

10/09/08 11:36:31 AM -2/-110 43.5 -110

10/09/08 11:56:31 AM -1.5/-110 43 -110

10/09/08 12:26:31 PM -1.5/-110 42.5 -110

10/09/08 4:46:31 PM 0/-110 42.5 -110

10/09/08 5:31:31 PM 1/-110 42.5 -110

10/09/08 6:06:32 PM 1/-110 42 -110

10/09/08 6:56:31 PM 1.5/-110 42 -110

10/09/08 7:21:31 PM 1.5/-110 42.5 -110

 

WSEX went from Wake -2.5 to Wake +1.5.

 

i looked at it when i typed it i saw -2.5, maybe it hadn't refreshed

either way i didn't bet it and wouldn't have

 

thanks though