merchasd 0 Posted October 6, 2011 Im 2-2 in a 14 team league. I lost in week three by 0.04 pts (yes that's 1 passing yard!) We start: QB, WR, WR, WR, RB, RB, TE, K, D My current squad: P Rivers H Nicks E Decker B Marshall S Moss D Bryant S Breaston A Peterson M Ingram M Tolbert K Hunter J Graham G Olsen R Gould ARI D I've been offered Peyton Hillis, Marques Colston and Jabr Gaffney for Santana Moss, Dez Bryant and Mark Ingram. At first glance it appears I'm giving up a lot of value, but I'm also loaded at WR in a 14 team league, and I could use an upgrade at RB. If I make the trade,tThe new team would be: P Rivers* H Nicks* E Decker B Marshall* M Colston* S Breaston A Peterson* P Hillis* M Tolbert K Hunter J Graham* G Olsen R Gould* ARI D* (* = likely starter) would you do this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nomad99 742 Posted October 6, 2011 Don't do it......... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
p.man 7 Posted October 6, 2011 No way! Keep Ingram too. Don't trade him. Good Luck! Please see my topic if you can. Thanks! http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=391676 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Teetai09 0 Posted October 6, 2011 I would do it. Help me. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=391689 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Derrick 0 Posted October 6, 2011 If it's a redraft league I would do it. Hillis and AP are the only guys on their teams. Well Cleveland better realize that at least, I think they will. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Philo312 41 Posted October 6, 2011 I'd do that trade. You're right re: upgrade at RB. ...and you're upgrading WR as well. Colston whould be huge for you. Pull that one off, no question! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jonathanc5 0 Posted October 6, 2011 I would do it, moss and ingram weren't cracking your starting lineup before. So you basically switch starting WR (dez) for a starting RB(hillis). http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=391712 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Winning's4ThePhins 0 Posted October 6, 2011 I agree, I'd pull the trigger. Hillis will be an upgrade along with Colston. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcmmidwest 149 Posted October 6, 2011 i wouldn't dez is the kinda of player that will lead you to the championship you don't wanna loss him with h.knicks & dez your team is $$$ ingram & tolbert not so good i had to trade knicks for beanie because i was hurting at rb.....look to upgrade @rb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jjbeve 0 Posted October 6, 2011 I would leave your team alone. You're have a good WR core and you're pretty good at RB too. Don't mess with a good thing man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Madler 6 Posted October 6, 2011 I would do it. Hillis is now a solid RB2 for you. And Colston will be targeted more going forward. See mine http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=391746 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
team awesome 4 Posted October 6, 2011 Im 2-2 in a 14 team league. I lost in week three by 0.04 pts (yes that's 1 passing yard!) We start: QB, WR, WR, WR, RB, RB, TE, K, D My current squad: P Rivers H Nicks, E Decker, B Marshall, S Moss, D Bryant, S Breaston A Peterson, M Ingram, M Tolbert, K Hunter J Graham, G Olsen R Gould ARI D I've been offered Peyton Hillis, Marques Colston and Jabr Gaffney for Santana Moss, Dez Bryant and Mark Ingram. At first glance it appears I'm giving up a lot of value, but I'm also loaded at WR in a 14 team league, and I could use an upgrade at RB. If I make the trade,tThe new team would be: P Rivers* H Nicks* E Decker B Marshall* M Colston* S Breaston A Peterson* P Hillis* M Tolbert K Hunter J Graham* G Olsen R Gould* ARI D* (* = likely starter) would you do this? thanks for mine. I'm not really a fan of ingram and would much rather have hillis. hes a decent upgrade over ingram and gives you a strong RB corps s well as a decent wr corp. with colston, you aren't guaranteed anything week by week but hes in a dangerous offense. its an upgrade and the only thing you really lose in this is depth while gaining a better starting lineup. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphster 274 Posted October 7, 2011 Thanks for replying to mine. Hillis is an obvious upgrade but you're downgrading your WRs do get him. You've got enough depth to afford it, but I don't think Marshall or Colston is going to be what Bryant will be the 2nd half of the season. So long as Hillis replaces the points you're losing at WR you'll be fine. Classic give big win big scenario. I'd make the trade with tempered expectations from my WRs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites