GridironGuzzlers 3 Posted October 29, 2012 Both had long tenures with their teams. Both came up short in a super bowl and had numerous other playoff appearances. Both got credit for a fine coaching job because they were successful but were never the overwhelming favorite. Both had Irish-American (Mc's) QBs that were mobile but threw first but weren't always accurate. Servicable RB's but no near-HOFers. Never had stud WR (well TO for 1 yr) I could go on... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,658 Posted October 29, 2012 They boh look like they could give one hell of a mustache ride. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoadLizard 73 Posted October 29, 2012 Both are going to go down as decent head coaches that never won a Super Bowl. Reid's blind love for that piece of chit Mike Vick is gonna cost him his job though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
montana 89 Posted October 29, 2012 I like Fisher. He does more with less than any coach every where he goes. Reid is the anti-Fisher. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PackYourNut 47 Posted October 29, 2012 Jeff Fisher sux! No idea why he gets so much credit for being mediocre. Here is winning % for every game as a head coach! .537 So, he's a perennial 8-8 coach... Ya... he's awesome! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,658 Posted October 29, 2012 Jeff Fisher sux! No idea why he gets so much credit for being mediocre. Here is winning % for every game as a head coach! .537 So, he's a perennial 8-8 coach... Ya... he's awesome! Actually the proper ratio to represent Fisher's winning percentage would be 537-463. Not a lot better than .500, but still better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,043 Posted January 30 Andy Reid wishes he was Jeff Fisher Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
