edjr 5,935 Posted February 12 No surprise. Clearly hit the ground. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,044 Posted February 12 I can't see dogshizz from that 2 miles away camera angle. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,935 Posted February 12 2 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said: I can't see dogshizz from that 2 miles away camera angle. I can see it bounce Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,044 Posted February 12 Just now, edjr said: I can see it bounce Don't tell Steelers fans that, they'll lose their crap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 13,327 Posted February 12 There has always been too much made out of this. The Steelers lost the next week and the raiders most likely would have too. The dolphins were pretty strong that year. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,316 Posted February 12 2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said: There has always been too much made out of this. The Steelers lost the next week and the raiders most likely would have too. The dolphins were pretty strong that year. +1. Also, I didn't think the issue was whether Franco caught the ball(end zone camera pretty clearly shows he did), but whether it touched the defender or not. Since if it hadn't touched Tatum it would have been an illegal catch. I think Ed's got the wrong controversy here. Franco clearly caught the ball, not sure what "Bounce" Ed sees. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BufordT 379 Posted February 12 4 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said: There has always been too much made out of this. The Steelers lost the next week and the raiders most likely would have too. The dolphins were pretty strong that year. Kinda like the Fisk HR in 1975. Who cares? They lost game 7. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,935 Posted February 13 4 hours ago, Mike Honcho said: +1. Also, I didn't think the issue was whether Franco caught the ball(end zone camera pretty clearly shows he did), but whether it touched the defender or not. Since if it hadn't touched Tatum it would have been an illegal catch. I think Ed's got the wrong controversy here. Franco clearly caught the ball, not sure what "Bounce" Ed sees. boredom Share this post Link to post Share on other sites