The Immaculate Deception

[edjr 5,567]

 

 

No surprise. Clearly hit the ground. 

[Maximum Overkill 646]

I can't see dogshizz from that 2 miles away camera angle. 

[edjr 5,567]

2 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

I can't see dogshizz from that 2 miles away camera angle. 

I can see it bounce

[Maximum Overkill 646]

Just now, edjr said:

I can see it bounce

Don't tell Steelers fans that, they'll lose their crap. 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,656]

There has always been too much made out of this. The Steelers lost the next week and the raiders most likely would have too. The dolphins were pretty strong that year. 

[Mike Honcho 4,039]

2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

There has always been too much made out of this. The Steelers lost the next week and the raiders most likely would have too. The dolphins were pretty strong that year. 

+1.

Also, I didn't think the issue was whether Franco caught the ball(end zone camera pretty clearly shows he did), but whether it touched the defender or not.  Since if it hadn't touched Tatum it would have been an illegal catch.  I think Ed's got the wrong controversy here. 

Franco clearly caught the ball, not sure what "Bounce" Ed sees.

 

[BufordT 371]

4 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

There has always been too much made out of this. The Steelers lost the next week and the raiders most likely would have too. The dolphins were pretty strong that year. 

Kinda like the Fisk HR in 1975. Who cares? They lost game 7.

[edjr 5,567]

4 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

+1.

Also, I didn't think the issue was whether Franco caught the ball(end zone camera pretty clearly shows he did), but whether it touched the defender or not.  Since if it hadn't touched Tatum it would have been an illegal catch.  I think Ed's got the wrong controversy here. 

Franco clearly caught the ball, not sure what "Bounce" Ed sees.

 

boredom