Jim Mora 33 Posted February 25 Me: [rolls an 82] Awesome, for once I should get my top pick! cmh: [rolls 84] GB: [rolls 96] Me: 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cmh6476 1,010 Posted February 25 22 minutes ago, Jim Mora said: Me: [rolls an 82] Awesome, for once I should get my top pick! cmh: [rolls 84] GB: [rolls 96] Me: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cmh6476 1,010 Posted February 26 odds we start rolling in three minutes? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cmh6476 1,010 Posted February 26 Brent Rooker is not a second round grade Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,237 Posted February 26 4 minutes ago, cmh6476 said: Brent Rooker is not a second round grade He wasn’t intended. But really who do I have to pick from? It was him or profar I figured if snell was gone. And profar being gone was a blessing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,675 Posted February 26 I had already assumed Randy would not be a Ray this year , despite his diminishing numbers I love the guy but Snell is far and away the top player on my draft eligible list. So I had already planned to be going SP/SP. the bones never seem to be all that kind to me when it comes to trickle down effect. For example if Padres pick before me in round 1 and have access to Soto, or even just prefer Machado to Snell, I get Randy AND Snell... I think a lot of the time its better to pick after the teams who share your top players so long as they have better options than your guys. Also kind of thought Fairbanks wouldn't be a 2nd/3rd rounder Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bbascom 23 Posted February 26 Apologies for the delay. Crazy day at work and didn't have my list with me. And then I just couldn't decide what to do with my second pick. I'm hoping Hendricks bounces back to at least an 80-90% version of his former self. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,675 Posted February 27 Yikes. Yates was a bit of a fallback option for me after Fairbanks although I clearly never would have gotten him. Think it will be a great pick though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dcb291 6 Posted February 27 Question for commissioners. I was in the midst of editing my pick since I had just posted it, and did so but it looks like Raider picked almost simultaneously. Am I stuck with my first submission? I deleted the post with the edited pick Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,675 Posted February 27 19 minutes ago, dcb291 said: Question for commissioners. I was in the midst of editing my pick since I had just posted it, and did so but it looks like Raider picked almost simultaneously. Am I stuck with my first submission? I deleted the post with the edited pick Thanks im going to abstain.... i was going to make a pick but will hold off and see what @cmh6476 or @GuardBum think Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GuardBum 80 Posted February 27 Don't have a great opinion this year. Can't remember precedent. Believe it's been if a pick is made the edit has to be made and called before any next pick. Not even just available or shared. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GuardBum 80 Posted February 27 I'm on a phone and not in s place to look back Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,675 Posted February 27 7 minutes ago, GuardBum said: Don't have a great opinion this year. Can't remember precedent. Believe it's been if a pick is made the edit has to be made and called before any next pick. Not even just available or shared. I believe that is the precedent.... I remember someone wanting to change a pick a few years ago and we determined that players eligibility didn't matter it was simply if another pick had been made after. sounds like the picks were bang-bang? looking at the pick thread his pick was the last to be made again i'm abstaining for family ties reasons Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bbascom 23 Posted February 27 Just now, WhiteWonder said: I believe that is the precedent.... I remember someone wanting to change a pick a few years ago and we determined that players eligibility didn't matter it was simply if another pick had been made after. sounds like the picks were bang-bang? looking at the pick thread his pick was the last to be made again i'm abstaining for family ties reasons I happened to be in the thread when he first chose Manaea, then I saw RHR's post. Then as I scrolled back up dcd's pick for Manaea was gone. Then a minute or so later after I went back in to review the picks again because I was confused, the Manaea pick reappeared below RHR's. I don't know if that will help make a decision or not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cmh6476 1,010 Posted February 27 I think in the past we were good if they were quickly made and before another pick was made Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dcb291 6 Posted February 27 14 minutes ago, bbascom said: I happened to be in the thread when he first chose Manaea, then I saw RHR's post. Then as I scrolled back up dcd's pick for Manaea was gone. Then a minute or so later after I went back in to review the picks again because I was confused, the Manaea pick reappeared below RHR's. I don't know if that will help make a decision or not. This is correct. I made my pick of Manaea and immediately edited my pick to _________. After editing I saw that Raider had already made a post. I deleted mine and posted the original pick again. I probably should have edited it back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dcb291 6 Posted February 27 3 minutes ago, cmh6476 said: I think in the past we were good if they were quickly made and before another pick was made I made the edit very quickly but I do not know if the edit took before Raider made his selection or if he even saw my pick before making his own. And the player I was removing can also be drafted by the Padres but not the player I was editing to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dcb291 6 Posted February 27 It's not a big deal if it can't be changed. I wasn't even going to say anything because I did not expect a pick to be made as I was editing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bbascom 23 Posted February 27 17 minutes ago, dcb291 said: I made the edit very quickly but I do not know if the edit took before Raider made his selection or if he even saw my pick before making his own. And the player I was removing can also be drafted by the Padres but not the player I was editing to. I mean, if no one else has picked yet and all you are doing is opening up the opportunity for RHR to draft Manaea (the only other team that can draft him), I don't think it would matter that you make the edit. Then to be fair, RHR could adjust his before anyone else picks if he wants to pick Manaea. I'm not a commissioner though, so my vote really means nothing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,675 Posted February 27 17 minutes ago, bbascom said: I mean, if no one else has picked yet and all you are doing is opening up the opportunity for RHR to draft Manaea (the only other team that can draft him), I don't think it would matter that you make the edit. Then to be fair, RHR could adjust his before anyone else picks if he wants to pick Manaea. I'm not a commissioner though, so my vote really means nothing makes sense... but again I would prefer cmh or GB make the call (i'm not really a commish anyway) perhaps @RaiderHaters Revenge can review the situation and give his input... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GuardBum 80 Posted February 27 Never really was a commish but I'll weigh that since any pick was made before the delete or edit was made , and especially in this case where the exact player was picked, the original pick must stand. Holding further picks to wait doesn't make sense. Unless RHR had immediately noticed the edit and agreed to also allow and change his pick, which they didn't. Edit is null. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,237 Posted February 27 I had Manaea and pivetta as a coin toss. I’m fine with Pivetta I did see the Manaea pick but I was submitting Pivetta after Yates went Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,675 Posted February 27 As I understood it he was switching his pick more or less right as RHR was submitting his own… and swapping it to a player not draft able by RHR… meaning a move away from Manaea could only help RHR… but it sounds like RHR was making his pick regardless But I see what GB is saying and think that is probably logical Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,675 Posted February 27 I’ll consider this matter resolved and edit the draft thread with the picks and carry on Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,237 Posted February 27 30 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said: As I understood it he was switching his pick more or less right as RHR was submitting his own… and swapping it to a player not draft able by RHR… meaning a move away from Manaea could only help RHR… but it sounds like RHR was making his pick regardless But I see what GB is saying and think that is probably logical this brought up an interesting thought, I had Manaea on my list, my rank that round was Wacha-Boegarts-Yates-Pivetta-Manaea, so me picking early of Darvish, gave him too much insight and opportunity, I won't be posting so far in advance in the future he now had an advantage to not take Manaea til the 5th Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,237 Posted February 27 2 hours ago, dcb291 said: I made the edit very quickly but I do not know if the edit took before Raider made his selection or if he even saw my pick before making his own. And the player I was removing can also be drafted by the Padres but not the player I was editing to. I have no clue who that could be that I could also draft, there are a few guys that played with us and you but not any really on my radar, just being honest Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dcb291 6 Posted February 27 5 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: I have no clue who that could be that I could also draft, there are a few guys that played with us and you but not any really on my radar, just being honest No, I was saying my first entered pick was Manaea, who you could draft. But the player I edited to is not someone you can pick. Also for what it’s worth I did not realize you made any selection until after I made the edit, which is why I changed it back and I also did not see you already picked in round 4 until just reading your post about it here. Like I said earlier, it’s all good. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,237 Posted February 27 3 minutes ago, dcb291 said: No, I was saying my first entered pick was Manaea, who you could draft. But the player I edited to is not someone you can pick. Also for what it’s worth I did not realize you made any selection until after I made the edit, which is why I changed it back and I also did not see you already picked in round 4 until just reading your post about it here. Like I said earlier, it’s all good. ahh ok yep its serious but not serious at all bro Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim Mora 33 Posted February 27 13 hours ago, WhiteWonder said: Yikes. Yates was a bit of a fallback option for me after Fairbanks although I clearly never would have gotten him. Think it will be a great pick though Unfortunately, Fairbanks was my fallback option after Eovaldi was taken at 2.05. Happy to swap those picks if you'd like! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GuardBum 80 Posted February 27 Ultimately this is a self governing crew. We've never really had any issues once Edjr was done. Dude is cool in person but his online persona especially on ff forums is something... "unique". We generally can come to a consensus and should just rely on practicality of what we've learned in past years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cmh6476 1,010 Posted February 27 32 minutes ago, GuardBum said: Ultimately this is a self governing crew. We've never really had any issues once Edjr was done. Dude is cool in person but his online persona especially on ff forums is something... "unique". We generally can come to a consensus and should just rely on practicality of what we've learned in past years. fairly stated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cmh6476 1,010 Posted February 27 how long before we can skip @lambert58 ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,237 Posted February 27 15 minutes ago, cmh6476 said: how long before we can skip @lambert58 ? was it 8 hours or 24? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GuardBum 80 Posted February 27 thought 24 since it's only a couple times has it been an issue during the regular. The supplemental had more aggressive times Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,675 Posted February 27 I didn’t think we had any sort of timer in this draft, especially with how unique it is with picks being made well in advance…. But lambert is on a golf trip in Florida I will text him now 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GuardBum 80 Posted February 27 5 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said: I didn’t think we had any sort of timer in this draft, especially with how unique it is with picks being made well in advance…. But lambert is on a golf trip in Florida I will text him now Hopefully you get him in the middle of his backswing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,237 Posted February 27 21 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said: I didn’t think we had any sort of timer in this draft, especially with how unique it is with picks being made well in advance…. But lambert is on a golf trip in Florida I will text him now I think he said if he holds it up at any point give him Mikolas 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lambert58 71 Posted February 27 3 hours ago, cmh6476 said: how long before we can skip @lambert58 ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
