Ex wife of Google co founder speaks out against vaccines

[Frozenbeernuts 2,264]

It will never cease to amaze me that liberals have fully sided with big pharma. She says right here that data is purposely being censored on Google, even to the detriment of the co founders own daughter.

These people will gladly harm their own children for their pursuits. Yet you trust them?

https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1904979486677831857?s=19

[Engorgeous George 2,331]

Ex wives.  Mistakes of one's youth who can pop up at any inopportune moment with a megaphone.  A cross many must bear.

[jbycho 754]

2 hours ago, Engorgeous George said:

Ex wives.  Mistakes of one's youth who can pop up at any inopportune moment with a megaphone.  A cross many must bear.

Not me. I didn't get married til I got the majority of my youth out of me. 

[jbycho 754]

1 hour ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

It will never cease to amaze me that liberals have fully sided with big pharma. She says right here that data is purposely being censored on Google, even to the detriment of the co founders own daughter.

These people will gladly harm their own children for their pursuits. Yet you trust them?

https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1904979486677831857?s=19

It's good to have insiders that can tell the doubters how wrong they are. 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,264]

10 minutes ago, jbycho said:

It's good to have insiders that can tell the doubters how wrong they are. 

She didn't start realizing something was off until she started using Google to find answers. Even setting aside the debate about the dangers of vaccines, Google was obviously suppressing information and manipulating search results.

[TimHauck 2,877]

“Ex wife of google confounder” 

AKA “current wife of RFK jr”

[Frozenbeernuts 2,264]

5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

“Ex wife of google confounder” 

AKA “current wife of RFK jr”

They aren't married.

The point was showing she had a front row seat to what was happening.

[jbycho 754]

6 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

She didn't start realizing something was off until she started using Google to find answers. Even setting aside the debate about the dangers of vaccines, Google was obviously suppressing information and manipulating search results.

Anyone who uses Google and pays attention knows how freaking slanted they are. 

The problem is many people are prefer being lazy and just doing what the internet tells them. And Google is the most popular browser. 

 

[Engorgeous George 2,331]

17 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

“Ex wife of google confounder” 

AKA “current wife of RFK jr”

I thought REK Jr. was with Cheryl Hines.  I always liked her overbite look.

[TimHauck 2,877]

20 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

They aren't married.

The point was showing she had a front row seat to what was happening.

Tomato tomahto

 

My point is she’s biased.

[jbycho 754]

15 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Tomato tomahto

 

My point is she’s biased.

But not wrong. A person can be biased and correct. 

And that's a pretty strong statement from you given you have no clue if she is or not. 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,264]

38 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Tomato tomahto

 

My point is she’s biased.

It doesn't mean she's lying. She claims this started while she was married and looking for information on the onset of autism in her child.

She is coming to the same conclusion that many of us already have. She could have just stayed in the billionaire ex wife zone and not made herself a target to mainstream. If you watch enough of her videos it's obvious she isn't doing this just to jab at her ex.

[TimHauck 2,877]

Just now, Frozenbeernuts said:

It doesn't mean she's lying. She claims this started while she was married and looking for information on the onset of autism in her child.

She is coming to the same conclusion that many of us already have. She could have just stayed in the billionaire ex wife zone and not made herself a target to mainstream. If you watch enough of her videos it's obvious she isn't doing this just to jab at her ex.

What conclusion do you mean?

Google suppressed results?  Sure.

Vaccines cause autism? No.

 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,107]

2 hours ago, jbycho said:

Not me. I didn't get married til I the majority of my youth out of me. 

How long were you in prison? 

[squistion 2,203]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Tomato tomahto

My point is she’s biased.

Being an ex-wife means she probably has an axe to grind (so to speak) with her former spouse and negatively impacts her credibility. 

[jbycho 754]

13 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

How long were you in prison? 

I may have spent a night or two in a local cell back in the day, but for real? Not me man. The law was enough of a deterrent to keep my record clean. Plus I was brought up in a system of morals. To this day I have the fear of God in me. Damn my Catholic upbringing. 

[jbycho 754]

6 minutes ago, squistion said:

Being an ex-wife means she probably has an axe to grind (so to speak) with her former spouse and negatively impacts her credibility. 

You liberals are all the same. You only have angry women to choose from in life if you're not already gay. 

[TimHauck 2,877]

14 minutes ago, squistion said:

Being an ex-wife means she probably has an axe to grind (so to speak) with her former spouse and negatively impacts her credibility. 

I was more getting at her current relationship with RFK, not so much her former one.  I’m sure the dude doesn’t shut up about vaccines causing autism

[weepaws 3,194]

15 minutes ago, jbycho said:

You liberals are all the same. You only have angry women to choose from in life if you're not already gay. 

Trump had sex outside of his marriage, conservative.  

[Frozenbeernuts 2,264]

3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

What conclusion do you mean?

Google suppressed results?  Sure.

Vaccines cause autism? No.

 

Yes vaccines cause injuries and are not harmless. It's weird seeing liberals defend big pharma.

[TimHauck 2,877]

41 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Yes vaccines cause injuries and are not harmless. It's weird seeing liberals defend big pharma.

Injuries? Sure

Autism? No