Trial of Karen Read - Thoughts?

[artista928 12]

Defense attorney Runkle & Mark Bederow are summing up the trial thus far..

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CodTgf4RP2o

 

[Gepetto 1,321]

1 hour ago, artista928 said:

If you haven't watched the whole trial, just watch the defense on cross for all the cw's witnesses..

Remember too the Defense doesn't have to prove a thing. She needs to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. They just need to have poked one hoĺe..This sloppy investigated case screams reasonable doubt...

Here's a big one. The cw's medical examiner could not even say there was a homocide!

I've watched the trial. I think they need to prove she's innocent or have actual evidence proving she was framed to get the trial dismissed by the judge, otherwise she'll let the jury decide.

[artista928 12]

19 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

I've watched the trial. I think they need to prove she's innocent or have actual evidence proving she was framed to get the trial dismissed by the judge, otherwise she'll let the jury decide.

Defense doesn't need to prove anything. Bev will let it go to the end. She' ruled heavily for cw. She's biased as hell. There are huge holes in their lauhable case so she's not going to end it. I can't wait for Defense to call now fired because of this case in pt 1 & for Aarca to come on again.

 

 

[TheNewGirl 1,404]

So I saw that the state/commonwealth rested today, and I've been sort of tracking what's been happening this time around. 

The Judge has been awful, from what I've seen/heard. She gives small gestures or cues to the Prosecution to stop or whatever. 

 

 

[Maximum Overkill 1,839]

What Biden did to her was horrible 

 

[TheNewGirl 1,404]

Absolutely NOTHING to do with this trial. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,839]

1 minute ago, TheNewGirl said:

Absolutely NOTHING to do with this trial. 

Oooops 

[HellToupee 1,646]

Imagine the prosecution not calling the lead investigator and the state crash reconstruction guy but pay at least 400k for a hired gun to do a reconstruction who cosplayed the deceased in his report

 

[Gepetto 1,321]

 

[artista928 12]

I am soooo enjoying master Alessi & action Jackson desimate the cw witnesses. This case as more holes than swiss cheese along with shitty sloppy police procedures which screams corruption & cover up to me. The people reporting from inside the courtroom feel the jury isn't feeling cw. They are all in their 30s so imo more flexible in thought. Burgess was a major fail. All the lawyer channels I watch analyzing this case for us said they have never seen a bigger wtf ever. The fact that the defense lawyers are now pro bono on this case is very telling, especially Alessi who charges $1800 an hour. Hopefully the 12 deliberators see all the bs the cw has shown!

[artista928 12]

On 5/29/2025 at 10:27 AM, HellToupee said:

Imagine the prosecution not calling the lead investigator and the state crash reconstruction guy but pay at least 400k for a hired gun to do a reconstruction who cosplayed the deceased in his report

 

Mr paint was hilarious. No science, just reinactments. I can't wait for Aarca to blast Aperture's ass with real science & math like they did in the first trial.

[artista928 12]

As far as Proctor, if I was on the jury I'd be wonding where the hell is he. Cw not calling him, Higgins, trooper Paul... I would be thinking Proctor must be dead!

[artista928 12]

If you haven't watched the interview of one of the jurors after the 1st trial, google it. Everyone thought it was a slam dunk for the defense.

[Gepetto 1,321]

The defense just proved Karen Read was framed, in my mind. A sergeant in a police force testified that he was called to arrive at Karen Read's parents' house by her father. He was from a different jurisdiction and did not know any of the police involved in the investigation. He was contacted by Michael Proctor (the disgraced and fired lead investigator in the case that was fired for bias in this case), that Proctor was going to seize the black Lexus SUV at the Read (parents) residence) sometime around or after 3:30 pm the day John O'Keefe died. He testified that he saw the tail light and it was missing one piece about the size of a dollar bill. They showed him a picture in court of the tail light that was photographed after it was in police custody and his response, his testimony, is that picture depicts way more damage than he saw and that it had obviously been busted out.

[HellToupee 1,646]

34 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

The defense just proved Karen Read was framed, in my mind. A sergeant in a police force testified that he was called to arrive at Karen Read's parents' house by her father. He was from a different jurisdiction and did not know any of the police involved in the investigation. He was contacted by Michael Proctor (the disgraced and fired lead investigator in the case that was fired for bias in this case), that Proctor was going to seize the black Lexus SUV at the Read (parents) residence) sometime around or after 3:30 pm the day John O'Keefe died. He testified that he saw the tail light and it was missing one piece about the size of a dollar bill. They showed him a picture in court of the tail light that was photographed after it was in police custody and his response, his testimony, is that picture depicts way more damage than he saw and that it had obviously been busted out.

Funny Brennan asked him why he didn’t take a photo of the vehicle but the state police who had the car towed neglected to take them.

[Gepetto 1,321]

If you click play, I have it set to start with Sergeant Nick Barros testimony which turns this case to point to framed and innocence.

[artista928 12]

9 hours ago, Gepetto said:

If you click play, I have it set to start with Sergeant Nick Barros testimony which turns this case to point to framed and innocence.

Yes! Brennan did a decent cross but it fell way short. This cop has no reason to lie, to go against the others. He was in an àccident from a dui driver. If anything he'd be on that point in back of his mind.

Aunti Bev didn't want to rule this case as a mistrial with prejudice as Alessi argued the fact that Brennan can't bring up dna in cross since the defense never brought it up. So here you go. Karma. The case that was set to be defended on the count of poor police investigation now has corruption on it too!

It's no wonder all 4 lawyers are working hard all pro bono, 2 from Cali, 1 from NY & 1 from MA. The fund raising being done is n̈ot to pay the defense lawyers...it's to cover the costs of bringing in their witnesses. If she gets convicted, it'll probably be the largest outrage in history I'd imagine.

Btw, Peter is one I watch too. It's great to watch him & his dad together do the weekly recaps. Peter also is definitely not hard on the eyes.