Federal prosecutor in Adam Schiff mortgage fraud investigation thinks case insufficient to move forward

[SaintsInDome2006 598]

17 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

 "trained and bound to follow professional standards"

Everyone on this board I’m sure works for a living. Imagine getting sued for getting one thing wrong, especially with someone as litigious as Don Trump.

[shadrap 252]

16 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Because journalists are trained and bound to follow professional standards. I’m sure your boss doesn’t stand over you and watch every thing you do because you’re responsible & follow the standards of your trade.

don't have a boss.  

"journalists are trained and bound to follow professional standards".   MSNBC ??   LOL big time.

“I’ve said it for years now, he’s cogent. But I undersold it when I said he was cogent, he’s far beyond cogent. In fact, I think he’s better than he’s ever been, intellectually, analytically, because he’s been around for 50 years,” Scarborough said during a March 2024 “Morning Joe” broadcast. “Start your tape right now because I’m about to tell you the truth. And f-you if you can’t handle the truth. This version of Biden, intellectually, analytically, is the best Biden ever.”

[SaintsInDome2006 598]

8 minutes ago, shadrap said:

“I’ve said it for years now, he’s cogent. But I undersold it when I said he was cogent, he’s far beyond cogent. In fact, I think he’s better than he’s ever been, intellectually, analytically, because he’s been around for 50 years,” Scarborough said during a March 2024 “Morning Joe” broadcast. “Start your tape right now because I’m about to tell you the truth. And f-you if you can’t handle the truth. This version of Biden, intellectually, analytically, is the best Biden ever.”

Scarborough isn’t a journalist. He’s a Republican who used ti be a Congressman. And he’s definitely not a doctor either.

[SaintsInDome2006 598]

9 minutes ago, shadrap said:

don't have a boss.  

My guess is you have worked for a living and done a damn good job at what you do, and you’ve done it while following the rules of your trade, fair? Now imagine doing that job and if you screw one thing up, do one thing wrong, some litigious jerk sues you for it, for amounts you’ll never make in a lifetime. How careful would you be.

[seafoam1 3,392]

35 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Everyone on this board I’m sure works for a living. Imagine getting sued for getting one thing wrong, especially with someone as litigious as Don Trump.

Are you kidding? You know what it takes for those pretend journalists to get serious fines? CNN level BS "reporting" about the kid who stood his ground against some American Indian. That was disgusting and over the top sickness. 

Other than that, they claim it's opinion, bad source, or speculative numbers and they make a note in an editorial fix that no one reads a few days later. 

[SaintsInDome2006 598]

6 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Are you kidding? You know what it takes for those pretend journalists to get serious fines? CNN level BS "reporting" about the kid who stood his ground against some American Indian. That was disgusting and over the top sickness. 

Other than that, they claim it's opinion, bad source, or speculative numbers and they make a note in an editorial fix that no one reads a few days later. 

Yes, it requires malicious intent. An editorial fix means a correction in which they correct something they did. So there you’re talking about people who just invent quotes & fictional sources yet also have editors who correct statements according to guidelines.

Fox lost a lawsuit for $870 million, not chumpchange

[seafoam1 3,392]

7 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Yes, it requires malicious intent. An editorial fix means a correction in which they correct something they did. So there you’re talking about people who just invent quotes & fictional sources yet also have editors who correct statements according to guidelines.

Fox lost a lawsuit for $870 million, not chumpchange

And yet Fox is #1 and killing it these days. Go Trump!! 

[TimHauck 3,280]

12 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Yes, it requires malicious intent. An editorial fix means a correction in which they correct something they did. So there you’re talking about people who just invent quotes & fictional sources yet also have editors who correct statements according to guidelines.

Fox lost a lawsuit for $870 million, not chumpchange

And they didn’t even say anything particularly newsworthy here

[seafoam1 3,392]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

And they didn’t even say anything particularly newsworthy here

Go get em Timmy!! 

[SaintsInDome2006 598]

7 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

And yet Fox is #1 and killing it these days.

I do agree if people want facts & news Fox isn’t the place for them. It’s newstainment.

[seafoam1 3,392]

Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I do agree if people want facts & news Fox isn’t the place for them. It’s newstainment.

What are they saying that's wrong?

[SaintsInDome2006 598]

10 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

What are they saying that's wrong?

It’s more what they don’t say. Frequently it’s some video off of social media or something Pelosi or someone like that who did something awful. Meanwhile actually important things are going on in the world they don’t even mention.

One of my favorite things has always been when NYT or WaPo or WSJ or CNN some evil entity like that would report a thing, maga folks would reject it (fake news! sources shmhorzzes!) and then 3 weeks later they’d post some new outrage they’d learned from Breitbart or Gateway or something like that which when you looked at it just linked to the NYT/Wapo/WSJ report they’d rejected weeks ago.

[seafoam1 3,392]

48 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

It’s more what they don’t say. Frequently it’s some video off of social media or something Pelosi or someone like that who did something awful. Meanwhile actually important things are going on in the world they don’t even mention.

One of my favorite things has always been when NYT or WaPo or WSJ or CNN some evil entity like that would report a thing, maga folks would reject it (fake news! sources shmhorzzes!) and then 3 weeks later they’d post some new outrage they’d learned from Breitbart or Gateway or something like that which when you looked at it just linked to the NYT/Wapo/WSJ report they’d rejected weeks ago.

Facts in reality seem to hurt you. Sorry dude. 

[SaintsInDome2006 598]

16 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Facts in reality seem to hurt you. Sorry dude. 

Right, always neat to hear there’s a peace deal in Gaza & turn on “the news” to see a recycled social media video about a school board meeting on trans use of bathrooms in some random California town,

[Meglamaniac 769]

1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Right, always neat to hear there’s a peace deal in Gaza & turn on “the news” to see a recycled social media video about a school board meeting on trans use of bathrooms in some random California town,

Then why tune in to Fox, just to have something bish about

[TimHauck 3,280]

2 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

What are they saying that's wrong?

Remember when Jesse Watters thought $20 an hour was $100k a year?  Lol

[SaintsInDome2006 598]

3 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

Then why tune in to Fox, just to have something bish about

Because if you watch Fox you can actually see what’s happening to 44% of the country. 

[shadrap 252]

4 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

My guess is you have worked for a living and done a damn good job at what you do, and you’ve done it while following the rules of your trade, fair? Now imagine doing that job and if you screw one thing up, do one thing wrong, some litigious jerk sues you for it, for amounts you’ll never make in a lifetime. How careful would you be.

MSNBC is notorious for their 97% slant for the left.   "trained and bound to follow professional standards".  This is a joke right?  Russia collusion for 3 years------unnamed sources is their go to mantra.

LOL

[Meglamaniac 769]

49 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Because if you watch Fox you can actually see what’s happening to 44% of the country. 

not according to your post above, it's just newstainment

[SaintsInDome2006 598]

32 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

not according to your post above, it's just newstainment

It is, I think it’s worthwhile to see what messages are being communicated and how but thats a different sort of information.

[Meglamaniac 769]

43 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

It is, I think it’s worthwhile to see what messages are being communicated and how but thats a different sort of information.

Do you even read what you post??

I do agree if people want facts & news Fox isn’t the place for them. It’s newstainment.

Accordng to you Fox news tells you nothing of merit

 

[SaintsInDome2006 598]

16 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

Do you even read what you post??

I do agree if people want facts & news Fox isn’t the place for them. It’s newstainment.

Accordng to you Fox news tells you nothing of merit

Let’s put it this way, i also think it’s worthwhile looking at foreign propaganda, both domestic & for foreign audiences. I view it in the same vein.

[Meglamaniac 769]

Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Let’s put it this way, i also think it’s worthwhile looking at foreign propaganda, both domestic & for foreign audiences. I view it in the same vein.

You cant have it both ways, make up your mind, is it news or is it not

 

Because if you watch Fox you can actually see what’s happening to 44% of the country. 

 

[TimHauck 3,280]

49 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

You cant have it both ways, make up your mind, is it news or is it not

 

Because if you watch Fox you can actually see what’s happening to 44% of the country. 

 

He didn’t say he believes it’s real news, he’s saying the people that watch it believe it’s real news.  Your gotcha attempt here is a failure, HTH.

[seafoam1 3,392]

3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Remember when Jesse Watters thought $20 an hour was $100k a year?  Lol

Yeah? Where is that?

Here's your girl/boy.

 

[Meglamaniac 769]

6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He didn’t say he believes it’s real news, he’s saying the people that watch it believe it’s real news.  Your gotcha attempt here is a failure, HTH.

Pretty sure Saints can speak for himself

No gotcha seeked a$$hat, that's your schick

[TimHauck 3,280]

1 minute ago, Meglamaniac said:

Pretty sure Saints can speak for himself

No gotcha seeked a$$hat, that's your schick

“You can’t have it both ways, make up your mind” = gotcha attempt.

HTH

[Meglamaniac 769]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

“You can’t have it both ways, make up your mind” = gotcha attempt.

HTH

LOL

Nope, it's simple 

Take your meds TimHack

Like I said Saints can speak for himslef, he doesn't need some retard to speak for him

[seafoam1 3,392]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

“You can’t have it both ways, make up your mind” = gotcha attempt.

HTH

And you are batting .000 at this point.