TimHauck 3,474 Posted December 23 I will say, the segment wasn’t particularly groundbreaking. Might be new information to the 80 year olds that still watch 60 minutes on over the air TV, but not really to anyone that has paid attention to this story. I don’t watch 60 minutes though so not sure if that is typical for them or not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,474 Posted December 24 17 hours ago, Strike said: https://www.axios.com/2025/12/22/60-minutes-episode-leaked This appears to be one of the “comments.” A lame whatabout. CBS was being nice by not including that IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BeenHereBefore 1,682 Posted December 24 WTF and how old are ya? Only 70 year old's watch that show and believe there BS. Let me guess you are in bed by 9PM every night. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,474 Posted yesterday at 12:22 AM On 12/23/2025 at 2:38 PM, Strike said: https://www.axios.com/2025/12/22/60-minutes-episode-leaked On 12/23/2025 at 3:27 PM, TimHauck said: Also…Why didn’t Axios publish those comments? Curious of your thoughts here @Strike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,050 Posted yesterday at 12:38 AM 15 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Curious of your thoughts here @Strike So now that I've put your mentions on ignore you're gonna just start with the quoting over and over thing again? Geez, you have no ethics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,090 Posted yesterday at 12:40 AM No one cares. Some kid with an I phone exposing left wing fraud owns the news cycle now. lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,474 Posted yesterday at 12:53 AM 13 minutes ago, Strike said: So now that I've put your mentions on ignore you're gonna just start with the quoting over and over thing again? Geez, you have no ethics. The purpose of tagging someone is to get their attention, which I was trying to do to see if you had a response to my very legitimate question. While we’re at it, good to see you trust anonymous sources now. I’ll keep that in mind for the future. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,090 Posted yesterday at 01:20 AM 26 minutes ago, TimHauck said: The purpose of tagging someone is to get their attention, which I was trying to do to see if you had a response to my very legitimate question. While we’re at it, good to see you trust anonymous sources now. I’ll keep that in mind for the future. Why don’t you go take a shower? Alone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 1,485 Posted yesterday at 01:51 AM 57 minutes ago, TimHauck said: The purpose of tagging someone is to get their attention, which I was trying to do to see if you had a response to my very legitimate question. While we’re at it, good to see you trust anonymous sources now. I’ll keep that in mind for the future. ignoring you is a response Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,090 Posted yesterday at 01:57 AM 5 minutes ago, Gepetto said: ignoring you is a response I ignore Hack for the most part. I usually just mock him. But I’m thinking about cutting him off. He hasn’t changed one bit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,474 Posted yesterday at 02:03 AM 11 minutes ago, Gepetto said: ignoring you is a response Selectively ignoring responses is an admission of defeat Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 1,485 Posted yesterday at 03:26 AM 1 hour ago, TimHauck said: Selectively ignoring responses is an admission of defeat Sometimes. Other times it's a choice of sanity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
