onejayhawk 3 Posted April 14, 2006 There was a thread about this back at the signing. I would still like some fresh input. Off the top of my head, it seems a good fit for fantasy purposes, since he is a bomb thrower, and so is Al Davis. He certainly has the WR's to go go go. J Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jocstrap 8 Posted April 14, 2006 It all comes down to Moss. If Moss is healthy and plays every game that leaves a lot of 1 on 1 coverage with Porter, Gabriel, Curry and Brooks should be a solid 23-27 td type of guy. Moss makes a Qb look great period. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raider 84 29 Posted April 14, 2006 5200 yards 44 tds 5 rushing tds Watch out Manning and Marino! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yanivsme 0 Posted April 14, 2006 5200 yards 44 tds 5 rushing tds Watch out Manning and Marino! I know your a raider fan and you have a great wishful thinking but stop being silly like this guy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mikeso 0 Posted April 14, 2006 overall i think he will do better then when he was a saint.... that being said i will draft him as a #2 back up QB this year, prob late rounds.....its worth a gamble... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raider 84 29 Posted April 15, 2006 I know your a raider fan and you have a great wishful thinking but stop being silly like this guy Wishful thinking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redtodd 7 Posted April 15, 2006 I think he will be OK. Nothing special, but not a bust. Similiar to his NO days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
harken34 0 Posted April 15, 2006 Collins or Brooks When your O-Line sucks it really doesn't matter. But too answer your question. Not too good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ellisonb11 0 Posted April 15, 2006 Collins or Brooks When your O-Line sucks it really doesn't matter. But too answer your question. Not too good. well said Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bishop82 61 Posted April 15, 2006 I see Brooks doing better in Oakland then he ever did in New Orleans. Outside of Denver, all the teams in the AFC West have no D. We'll see come September Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted April 15, 2006 Aaron Brooks is Aaron Brooks. What you see is what you get. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
49ER MAN 0 Posted April 15, 2006 He has some legit weapons with Oakland with Moss, Porter and Jordan so maybe they draft Vernon Davis if he's available to help stretch the field. If the o-line can do a good job to protect Brooks and Moss can stay healthy, perhaps 25-28 TD's for Brooks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JT 137 Posted April 16, 2006 He has some legit weapons with Oakland with Moss, Porter and Jordan so maybe they draft Vernon Davis if he's available to help stretch the field. If the o-line can do a good job to protect Brooks and Moss can stay healthy, perhaps 25-28 TD's for Brooks. Help stretch the field? That's the one thing that the Raiders personnel indicates they should do well. Their problems include an inability to block on the offensive line, no defense to speak of, no WR willing to consistently catch the ball across the middle of the field, and an inconsistent QB with a strong arm and a weak decision making process. Which means they're in exactly the same place they were at this time last year. Brooks has been around 7 years now, 6 of those as a starter on a team with plenty of offensive weapons. He'll do just about what he's always done: 22-25 TD, 16-18 Int. Oh, and the team will lose lots of games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JetsFan28 0 Posted April 16, 2006 Lots of INT's and plenty of losses. That's what I see in Brooks' future with the Raiders. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted April 16, 2006 Help stretch the field? That's the one thing that the Raiders personnel indicates they should do well. Their problems include an inability to block on the offensive line, no defense to speak of, no WR willing to consistently catch the ball across the middle of the field, and an inconsistent QB with a strong arm and a weak decision making process. Which means they're in exactly the same place they were at this time last year. Brooks has been around 7 years now, 6 of those as a starter on a team with plenty of offensive weapons. He'll do just about what he's always done: 22-25 TD, 16-18 Int. Oh, and the team will lose lots of games. He brings better mobility and the hope of a better chemistry to the team. Other than that, I agree. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deadpool 0 Posted April 16, 2006 I think it just depends on him. If he comes in and is still the inconsistent decision maker that we have come to known the last few years, he will throw for 3200 yds, 22 TDs - 20 INTs. I agree that he has weapons in Oakland, but he also had weapons in NO as well. Granted, it didn't help him any losing Duece and Stallworth dropping passes everywhere. What he needs in Oakland to make him succeed is a good O-line, a good possesion reciever (a good pass-catching TE would work here also), and a good QB coach to help him with his decision making. Only time will tell though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fantasyfreakny 0 Posted April 16, 2006 Raiders were fed up with Collins.Wait till they get a half of a season of brooks turing thre ball over alot and smileing on the sideline when they are getting blown out.Im a saints fan and good luck with brooks.He has great talent but hes just not to smart.Makes bad reads ,forces the ball.Moss and him should get along great............................................ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
