Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
famousb

Art Shell - what kind of offense does he run?

Recommended Posts

Is Shell more prone to that go-deep style that Al Davis loves, or does he do more of the short pass & move the chains style. Or is he more of a run then pass guy...

 

I'm trying to get a grip on what to expect from him as a head coach, and what he's going to do w/ that offense. And since he hasn't been a head coach for so long i can't seem to remember they way he used to coach...

It was easy to remember Gibbs' running preference w/ the Hogs, but OAK is out of my memory banks for some reason...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

run

run

run

run

deep pass

run

run

deep pass

run

run

run

run

 

 

Lamont Jordan should e a top 10 fantasy producer - IMO-- and should be taken in the first 10 spots

 

TOP 5

LT, LJ, Alexander, Portis, Tiki

 

Then I would go Jordan or Edge at the #6 hole

 

Next 5 RBs

no particular order

Jordan, Edge Caddy, Rudi, Steve Jackson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
run

run

run

run

deep pass

run

run

deep pass

run

run

run

run

Lamont Jordan should e a top 10 fantasy producer - IMO-- and should be taken in the first 10 spots

 

TOP 5

LT, LJ, Alexander, Portis, Tiki

 

Then I would go Jordan or Edge at the #6 hole

 

Next 5 RBs

no particular order

Jordan, Edge Caddy, Rudi, Steve Jackson

 

PPR Jordan is #6 or #7.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

initially they had schroeder so yes, they ran a bit and then chucked it up to the likes of willie gault,

sweryn mervyn and ethan horton....

 

worked well in 1990 when they went 12-4...although ive deleted the championship game from my memory.

 

after a couple years they picked up hostetler and had a better team in my opinion...

more west coast-ish offense.... and a well balanced one...

 

overall, i would expect a old style offense cause thats what davis likes and also

im sure sheel and co will take a while to develop a more "intelligent" offense by todays standards...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LaMont Jordan was supposed to be a top producer with Norv Turner as well. Until the Raiders' defense can stop somebody and until the Raiders' o-line can block, he's not going to be a top anything. Last year he only carried 272-1025, but his fantasy numbers were saved by the ridiculous number of passes Kerry Collins threw his way (Jordan had 563 yards and 2 TDs receiving).

 

The Raiders threw about 55% of the time in the last Shell era. (so not exactly run run run run pass run run run run pass as posted by an earlier poster). The QBs had a pretty low completion percentage (50-55%). So yes, there will be long balls. I doubt Jordan will have anywhere near his 70 catches from last year. The most catches a back had in the Shell era was 47 by Harvey Williams in 1994. And Harvey had way better receiving skills than LaMont.

 

after a couple years they picked up hostetler and had a better team in my opinion...

more west coast-ish offense.... and a well balanced one...

 

Yeah. But Hoss' completion percentage didn't reach 60% until Mike White took over as head coach of the dink and dunk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LaMont Jordan was supposed to be a top producer with Norv Turner as well. Until the Raiders' defense can stop somebody and until the Raiders' o-line can block, he's not going to be a top anything. Last year he only carried 272-1025, but his fantasy numbers were saved by the ridiculous number of passes Kerry Collins threw his way (Jordan had 563 yards and 2 TDs receiving).

 

The Raiders threw about 55% of the time in the last Shell era. (so not exactly run run run run pass run run run run pass as posted by an earlier poster). The QBs had a pretty low completion percentage (50-55%). So yes, there will be long balls. I doubt Jordan will have anywhere near his 70 catches from last year. The most catches a back had in the Shell era was 47 by Harvey Williams in 1994. And Harvey had way better receiving skills than LaMont.

Yeah. But Hoss' completion percentage didn't reach 60% until Mike White took over as head coach of the dink and dunk.

 

that's some good insight...

Brooks did dump off the ball a good amount to Deuce in NO, so that could translate into a fair amount of receptions out of the backfield for LaMont as well as long as the new O leaves that option open.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
worked well in 1990 when they went 12-4...although ive deleted the championship game from my memory.

 

Wasn't that the game in which Schroeder threw 5 picks?

 

:evilgrin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Schroeder

 

Don't say that name. Don't you EVER say that name!!! :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jay Schro .....

 

OK :banana:

 

 

Hehe, I'm a born-and-raised Houstonian and lifelong Houston sports fan. Y'all got it easy over in Oakland. I have to watch replays of "The Choke" vs. the Bills and the UH-NC State college hoops championship every year on ESPN and NFL network :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once they draft vinc yung it will be

 

run

run

run

run

run

run

run

run

run

run

injured :banana: - Aaron Brooks back in after his benching week 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:banana: Swervyn Mervyn Fernandez :lol: there's a guy i haven't thought of in ages.

 

yes, Shell ran and then threw deep alot. but as noted that may have been because he had a strong arm QB in Schroeder and speedy deep threats like Swervyn Mervyn and Gault. etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it matter? He is coaching the Raiders. They SUCK!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×