surferskin 30 Posted May 26, 2006 That same book also says that he hit 73 home runs one year. Didn't Rosie Ruiz win a Boston Marathon, too? and ben johnson is -40- times faster than any man in the world. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,725 Posted May 26, 2006 That same book also says that he hit 73 home runs one year. Didn't Rosie Ruiz win a Boston Marathon, too? baseball-reference.com wned Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,087 Posted May 26, 2006 What I don't understand is the contention that Barry has "dramatically" changed his body due soely to roids. He was listed in 93' as weighing 220. He is listed in 06' as weighing 230. Sure he has gotten a little bigger, but people act like he went from Erkel to Ving Rames in one year. Has it ever occured to anybody that when he shaved his head clean, which was about at age 35, that his head may look different. Do you look the same as you did 15 years ago? graspingatstrawshere Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted May 26, 2006 graspingatstrawshere You actually provided my reply. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,087 Posted May 26, 2006 You actually provided my reply. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Blue 06 195 Posted May 26, 2006 The saddest thing about this is that Bonds didn't need to take that crap. He was probably gonna be considered one of the best ever without taking roids. He has great hand-eye coordination and a good eye at the plate. He would have made the hall of fame without going to cheating. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,725 Posted May 26, 2006 The saddest thing about this is that Bonds didn't need to take that crap. He was probably gonna be considered one of the best ever without taking roids. He has great hand-eye coordination and a good eye at the plate. He would have made the hall of fame without going to cheating. He's the only one that did steroids, right? He was just keeping up with the joneses, or the McGwireses and Sosaes hth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted May 26, 2006 What I don't understand is the contention that Barry has "dramatically" changed his body due soely to roids. He was listed in 93' as weighing 220. He is listed in 06' as weighing 230. Sure he has gotten a little bigger, but people act like he went from Erkel to Ving Rames in one year. Has it ever occured to anybody that when he shaved his head clean, which was about at age 35, that his head may look different. Do you look the same as you did 15 years ago? graspingatstrawshere this just isn't true...he weighed like 185 for the first 10 years he played. check one of his old baseball cards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,087 Posted May 26, 2006 this just isn't true...he weighed like 180 for the first 10 years he played. check one of his old baseball cards. Yup you are right. He was closer to 205 in 93' and came in the league 20 years ago listed just around 190. On a similar note: Michael Jordan has to be on Roids too! "Michael Jordan and Barry Bonds share several characteristics. Immediately one thinks of MVPs, work ethic, and domination of sport. But it is their weight that should be focused upon. Both entered their respective leagues weighing less than 190 pounds. They were skinny 21 year olds. 15 years later both players weighed over 220 pounds" http://legalball.com/MLB_News_Barry_Bonds_Steroids Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted May 26, 2006 Changes Occurring with Age A decline in our physical abilities starts around age 30, continues throughout our life, and reaches a plateau between ages 60 and 70. After the plateau, a slower decline follows. The rate of decline varies with our individual level of fitness as well as our lifestyle. The speed at which our nerves conduct impulses declines approximately 15%, resulting in decreased reaction time and slowness in performing tasks. Maximum breathing capacity decreases approximately 40% during this period. Individuals with chronic lung disease, such as emphysema, suffer a more significant decline. Cardiovascular function declines approximately one half of one percent each year starting around age 30. It is no coincidence that many world-class and endurance athletes begin gradually leaving their sport after this age. There is a 40% to 50% reduction in muscle mass during this period with a similar decline in bone mass. There is a simultaneous increase in body fat in both men and women. The metabolic rate also declines with age. This decline is mostly affected by muscle mass. Regular exercise helps to preserve muscle mass, particularly muscle loading exercises such as weight training, walking, and physically challenging occupations. Taken from the Hughes Medical Report. This is a natural phenomenon for all males over the age of 30, except Barry Bonds, who put on forty pounds of muscle after the age of 35. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jeremy 0 Posted May 26, 2006 Obviously the steriod use is going to taint his legacy, and justifiably so. But looking at the entirety of his career (not just the last 7 years), I still think he's the best of his generation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,087 Posted May 26, 2006 Changes Occurring with Age A decline in our physical abilities starts around age 30, continues throughout our life, and reaches a plateau between ages 60 and 70. After the plateau, a slower decline follows. The rate of decline varies with our individual level of fitness as well as our lifestyle. The speed at which our nerves conduct impulses declines approximately 15%, resulting in decreased reaction time and slowness in performing tasks. Maximum breathing capacity decreases approximately 40% during this period. Individuals with chronic lung disease, such as emphysema, suffer a more significant decline. Cardiovascular function declines approximately one half of one percent each year starting around age 30. It is no coincidence that many world-class and endurance athletes begin gradually leaving their sport after this age. There is a 40% to 50% reduction in muscle mass during this period with a similar decline in bone mass. There is a simultaneous increase in body fat in both men and women. The metabolic rate also declines with age. This decline is mostly affected by muscle mass. Regular exercise helps to preserve muscle mass, particularly muscle loading exercises such as weight training, walking, and physically challenging occupations. Taken from the Hughes Medical Report. This is a natural phenomenon for all males over the age of 30, except Barry Bonds, who put on forty pounds of muscle after the age of 35. I guess Karl Malone, Roger Clemens, Jerry Rice, Curt Schilling, Michael Jordan, and many other great athletes have to be on roids too. Since it cannot be done after 35 without it. Sure Barry prolly took some performance enhancing drugs, but don't over exaggerate that this somehow made him into the Hulk and his talent and work ethic have little to do with it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kilroy69 1,026 Posted May 26, 2006 I guess Karl Malone, Roger Clemens, Jerry Rice, Curt Schilling, Michael Jordan, and many other great athletes have to be on roids too. Since it cannot be done after 35 without it. Sure Barry prolly took some performance enhancing drugs, but don't over exaggerate that this somehow made him into the Hulk and his talent and work ethic have little to do with it. His talent and work ethic would have landed him in the hall HOF with the required 500 homers to get in. However the roids made MANY hits that would have been just along fly ball into dingers. Roids can't help you hit a curve, but they will make you hit that curve father. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted May 26, 2006 I guess Karl Malone, Roger Clemens, Jerry Rice, Curt Schilling, Michael Jordan, and many other great athletes have to be on roids too. Since it cannot be done after 35 without it. Sure Barry prolly took some performance enhancing drugs, but don't over exaggerate that this somehow made him into the Hulk and his talent and work ethic have little to do with it. The only guy on that list who has put on a significant amount of muscle past the age of 35 is Clemens. I've never said that I believe Clemens has been steroid-free. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted May 26, 2006 Yup you are right. He was closer to 205 in 93' and came in the league 20 years ago listed just around 190. On a similar note: Michael Jordan has to be on Roids too! "Michael Jordan and Barry Bonds share several characteristics. Immediately one thinks of MVPs, work ethic, and domination of sport. But it is their weight that should be focused upon. Both entered their respective leagues weighing less than 190 pounds. They were skinny 21 year olds. 15 years later both players weighed over 220 pounds" http://legalball.com/MLB_News_Barry_Bonds_Steroids 87 Fleer 91 Leaf i couldn't find the back of anything past 91 in my quick search but he's the same weight(185) from 87-91. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,725 Posted May 26, 2006 His talent and work ethic would have landed him in the hall HOF with the required 500 homers to get in. However the roids made MANY hits that would have been just along fly ball into dingers. Roids can't help you hit a curve, but they will make you hit that curve father. You haters just keep spewing the same nonsense. You're not an athlete, you're not a doctor, you have no focking clue if steroids will help you hit a baseball farther. One thing we do know about steroids, it's helps you recover faster from injury and it allows you to grow bigger muscle mass. Does that equal more home runs? Prove it. TIA 87 Fleer 91 Leaf i couldn't find the back of anything past 91 in my quick search but he's the same weight(185) from 87-91. Now show me John Kruk when he was 25 and then 35. TIA Point? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted May 26, 2006 Now show me John Kruk when he was 25 and then 35. TIA Point? the point was that KSB2424 said he was 220 in 93, i said he was still listed at his rookie weight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kilroy69 1,026 Posted May 26, 2006 You haters just keep spewing the same nonsense. You're not an athlete, you're not a doctor, you have no focking clue if steroids will help you hit a baseball farther. One thing we do know about steroids, it's helps you recover faster from injury and it allows you to grow bigger muscle mass. Does that equal more home runs? Prove it. TIA Now show me John Kruk when he was 25 and then 35. TIA Point? You live in a dream land if you don't think roids will help you hit home runs. We may not be atheletes now but most of us have played some sort of college or highschool ball. We are not nieve enough to think that the incredible barry did all this on his own. Its not hating on a great athelete because his is black or an arsehole. Its hating on him because he cheated the game. Pure and simple. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted May 26, 2006 93 Topps J.J. Walker laughs at his physique in that picture. Dyn-O-Mite! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,087 Posted May 26, 2006 93 Topps I not sure about this, but does Topps, Donruss, and Fleer weigh these guys every year? Or do they just use the last years vitals when they print the baseball cards for each and every player in the MLB. It seems less plausible that a person would weigh the EXACT same every year. Not 184 then 188 or even 185 then 187. BUT they put 185 until it is finally updated, seems more likley. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted May 26, 2006 J.J. Walker laughs at his physique in that picture. newbie, that means he's only gained 45 pounds of muscle since then...like that's a lot or something. I not sure about this, but does Topps, Donruss, and Fleer weigh these guys every year? Or do they just use the last years vitals when they print the baseball cards for each and every player in the MLB. It seems less plausible that a person would weigh the EXACT same every year. Not 184 then 188 or even 185 then 187. BUT they put 185 until it is finally updated, seems more plausible. i'd imagine it's the team that releases that stuff, like the info that's in the program. i'm sorry, it's doubtful that he's listed at 185 and really weighs 220. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
p.man 7 Posted May 26, 2006 One thing we do know about steroids, it's helps you recover faster from injury and it allows you to grow bigger muscle mass. Does that equal more home runs? Prove it. TIA It will also have an effect on his balls at some point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,087 Posted May 26, 2006 http://legalball.com/MLB_News_Barry_Bonds_Steroids "The national media has assumed that Bonds’ weight gain is the result of years of illegal steroid use. However, this is irresponsible reporting. Bonds has never had a gigantic weight gain in his career. Radio host Ralph Barbieri and Tom Tolbert were discussing as much yesterday by stating that Bonds never increased his weight more than 12 pounds over an off-season. This fact immediately detracts from those who point at this substantial, yet nonexistent, weight gain. The spotlight should be focused on those who came back from the off-season with 20 pounds of added muscle. Furthermore, the spotlight should be placed on those who lost the muscle this past season with the new steroid rules in affect. Two players who immediately come to mind are Jason Giambi and Sammy Sosa. Both bulked up and had monster years when there was no drug testing. And both lost tremendous weight and statistics once drug testing was in place. Bonds, however, played at the same weight during both periods." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,725 Posted May 26, 2006 93 Topps He hit 46 HR in 93, clearly he was doing steroids. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kilroy69 1,026 Posted May 26, 2006 Look his rookie card and see what the roids did to him. http://www.flickr.com/photos/greggoconnell/135063093/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,725 Posted May 26, 2006 http://legalball.com/MLB_News_Barry_Bonds_Steroids "The national media has assumed that Bonds’ weight gain is the result of years of illegal steroid use. However, this is irresponsible reporting. Bonds has never had a gigantic weight gain in his career. Radio host Ralph Barbieri and Tom Tolbert were discussing as much yesterday by stating that Bonds never increased his weight more than 12 pounds over an off-season. This fact immediately detracts from those who point at this substantial, yet nonexistent, weight gain. The spotlight should be focused on those who came back from the off-season with 20 pounds of added muscle. Furthermore, the spotlight should be placed on those who lost the muscle this past season with the new steroid rules in affect. Two players who immediately come to mind are Jason Giambi and Sammy Sosa. Both bulked up and had monster years when there was no drug testing. And both lost tremendous weight and statistics once drug testing was in place. Bonds, however, played at the same weight during both periods." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted May 26, 2006 that's quite a reputable site you're quoting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,725 Posted May 26, 2006 that's quite a reputable site you're quoting. Is it any less reputable than your or newbie's opinion? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted May 26, 2006 Is it any less reputable than your or newbie's opinion? everything written on the intranet is true. HTH I fully admit he did steroids. That's not even in question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted May 26, 2006 Why didn't I ever visit Legalball.com? Who the hell is the webmaster? Barry Bonds? So, I guess 99% of all baseball fans need their eyes checked. Bonds didn't really gain 45 lbs. of muscle in a two year period. And his head is the same size, too. And he went from a 35 home run per year guy to a 60-73 year guy just because he decided, at age 35, to put in a little extra time in the batting cage. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,725 Posted May 26, 2006 everything written on the intranet is true. HTH I've said this, time and time again. I don't see why it's so important now. He did steroids, like 75% of the rest of the league he was part of. That's nothing new. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted May 26, 2006 I've said this, time and time again. I don't see why it's so important now. He did steroids, like 75% of the rest of the league he was part of. That's nothing new. then why are you arguing about it now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,725 Posted May 26, 2006 then why are you arguing about it now? I'm arguing that his doing steroids, doesn't at all take away from what he did on the field. he like everyone else in the majors was doing them. Why is he suddenly the scapegoat? His stats are his stats, they will not be taken away. You and Newbie can b!tch and moan all you want. May I remind you the title of this thread? Barry Bonds best of his generation. Thanks. Maybe we can do this again sometime soon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,087 Posted May 26, 2006 Why didn't I ever visit Legalball.com? Who the hell is the webmaster? Barry Bonds? So, I guess 99% of all baseball fans need their eyes checked. Bonds didn't really gain 45 lbs. of muscle in a two year period. And his head is the same size, too. And he went from a 35 home run per year guy to a 60-73 year guy just because he decided, at age 35, to put in a little extra time in the batting cage. So I guess 99% of humans don't gain weight naturally from age 21 to 41. Did he use, yeah. But isn't it more likely that he has not used as much or not the raging growth hormones like Giambi and/or Sosa because Barry has not lost substantial wieght since 03'. Sure Barry Bonds used some kinds of performance enhancing drugs, but unlike other athletes, who are younger btw, it looks as if he was not AS dependent on them. The fact is Barry gained those 40 lbs over an exended period of time, its not like he showed up one day and was the Hulk. If you don't like Barry and you want to call him a cheater then fine, just don't over exaggerate everything, and use him as the scapegoat for the steroid era. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,725 Posted May 26, 2006 Barry Bonds home runs from year to year. 1986 16 1987 25 1988 24 1989 19 1990 33 1991 25 1992 34 1993 46 1994 37 1995 33 1996 42 1997 40 1998 37 1999 34 2000 49 2001 73 2002 46 2003 45 2004 45 You geniuses that claim he's been doing steroids since 1996 and his career #'s are a joke and he only hit's HR's because of steroids. How do you explain 2001? Did he do extra steroids? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted May 26, 2006 Barry Bonds home runs from year to year. 1986 16 1987 25 1988 24 1989 19 1990 33 1991 25 1992 34 1993 46 1994 37 1995 33 1996 42 1997 40 1998 37 1999 34 2000 49 2001 73 2002 46 2003 45 2004 45 You geniuses that claim he's been doing steroids since 1996 and his career #'s are a joke and he only hit's HR's because of steroids. How do you explain 2001? Did he do extra steroids? it was the cattle steriods. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,725 Posted May 26, 2006 it was the cattle steriods. Your argument gets weaker and weaker by the post. keep up the good work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted May 26, 2006 Barry Bonds home runs from year to year. 1986 16 1987 25 1988 24 1989 19 1990 33 1991 25 1992 34 1993 46 1994 37 1995 33 1996 42 1997 40 1998 37 1999 34 2000 49 2001 73 2002 46 2003 45 2004 45 You geniuses that claim he's been doing steroids since 1996 and his career #'s are a joke and he only hit's HR's because of steroids. How do you explain 2001? Did he do extra steroids? Growth Hormone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 30 Posted May 26, 2006 Your argument gets weaker and weaker by the post. keep up the good work. i didn't even know we were still arguing...we both agree he did steriods. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites