GhostofMeanMachine99 1 Posted October 9, 2006 There was talk of that this summer. There is a sports radio station in my building a few floors up, 790thezone.com. They mentioned that he bought a house down here and that he was seen around town. Whenever the sixers come to town, there are always these big AI in the ATL parties around him with him and other celebs and athletes making guest appearances. One of the rumors had Harrington and draft picks going up there. There were a couple of other deals that were talked about as well. But the Hawks management was in a state of flux too. They had a judge overturn ownership several times, so nobody down here knew what was going on with the team. And lo and behold, the season rolls back around. well you got an up and coming phillies baseball team to look forward to. if you sign aramis ramirez to play 3B, then you all should take the division when MLB bans geritol (wipes out the Mets pitching staff). The braves are done for about 5 years or until they rid themselves of AOL/TW as owners. The Marlins could be scary too with those youngsters on the field and that entire pitching staff. and i have ryan howard on my FB team. Common sense tells people that AI needs to be in ATL. IMO, he'll never win a championship, but nonetheless, he's great to watch. Sure fire HOF (ala Dominique). I'd take Harrington and picks, fo sho. If they got Harrington, they'd have to move Webber, which is impossible with his contract. His contract is the albatross around the Sixers' neck. I've always been a big Webber fan (my game is like his except i have heart), but he offers nothing to the team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IN$TANT REPAY 11 Posted October 9, 2006 Common sense tells people that AI needs to be in ATL. IMO, he'll never win a championship, but nonetheless, he's great to watch. Sure fire HOF (ala Dominique). I'd take Harrington and picks, fo sho. If they got Harrington, they'd have to move Webber, which is impossible with his contract. His contract is the albatross around the Sixers' neck. I've always been a big Webber fan (my game is like his except i have heart), but he offers nothing to the team. One of my best friends and former co-workers is a diehard Sixers and Stillers fan. So I hear about all of their bad moves that they make and Webber's knee and contract on the daily. And I saw Neke on the elevator during the summer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofMeanMachine99 1 Posted October 9, 2006 One of my best friends and former co-workers is a diehard Sixers and Stillers fan. So I hear about all of their bad moves that they make and Webber's knee and contract on the daily. And I saw Neke on the elevator during the summer. I gotta get back to work, but man I love the Sixers. I kinda feel bad for Mo Cheeks because Billy King's given him crap to work with. Webber and Korver can't play a lick of defense, Korver can't offer any kind of weakside rebounding, Dalember is immensely talented but has no real work ethic, and Iguodala lacks a mid range game. Worst part about the situation is ownership. The owner is only worried about filling the seats and not putting together a winning team. We all know the team won't win this season, and for the team to move on, they gotta let AI go somewhere else, and the owner's gotta sell the team. I think both happen if fans stay away early on this season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D'ohmer Simpson 0 Posted October 9, 2006 I almost had a heart attack on three or four occasions. Better luck next time. j/k Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Next Generation 10 Posted October 9, 2006 Eagles played a hell of a game. I didnt think the Cowboys would win even though I picked them to, actually, I was figuring on one of those big Eagles ass whoopings but this game was far beyond my expectations. At the end of the day, I am a football fan and this was a great football game. There were lots of turn over and lots of mistakes but lets be honest, both defenses caused them. Both teams had big plays. Both teams had chances to put the game out of reach and both teams kept fighting back. It was exciting as hell and I almost had a heart attack on three or four occasions. Bledsoe was absolutely awful, even for Bledsoe. He is always going to have problems against the Eagles because they blitz up the middle on every play and the guy has the mobility of Andre the Giant. I am a die hard Cowboys fan but I just dont like our chances with Bledsoe in there. He has come up huge in both big games, too bad it was huge for the other team. Bledsoe will always go in an whoop up on the likes of Tennessee and Washington but when he plays a legitimate team with anything riding on it, he cant close the deal. Even with a mediocre QB the Cowboys had a good chance of winning that game. We were right in it until the last 30 seconds. This game could have just as easily been a blow out for the Cowboys. They had their chances. Good game Eagles. Great humor from the Eagles fans. See you on Christmas. Wrong. They couldn't stop McNabb. Every time the Cowboys did anything the Eagles O struck right back and took the lead. Sure, the Cowboys could have won but let's not get ridiculous that it could have been a blow-out. The Eagles O was better than the Cowboys D, the Eagles D was better than the Cowboys O. Nuff said! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofMeanMachine99 1 Posted October 9, 2006 Wrong. They couldn't stop McNabb. Every time the Cowboys did anything the Eagles O struck right back and took the lead. Sure, the Cowboys could have won but let's not get ridiculous that it could have been a blow-out. The Eagles O was better than the Cowboys D, the Eagles D was better than the Cowboys O. Nuff said! I agree with you. I don't see how Dallas had a chance to blow out the Eagles. That statement's just homer-retarded, but what else can one expect from a delusional Clownboy fan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
9-Route 0 Posted October 9, 2006 awesome game! was really weird to start, kind of topsy-turvy with the different turnovers and scoring (bledsoe a 7yd run??!!) the eagles blitz package/strategy was spot on, and obviously made a terrible outing for drew; yet, the eagles offense/run game couldnt ice the game when it needed, and the boys actually had a chance with 1 minute to go on the 5yd yd line. wow. mcfagg did look broke on several throws, and his receivers missed a lot of makeable catches in the short and intermediate ranges (lj smith in particular); but, he took his chances/shots deep and it paid off big time. i just wished the boys had tried more of it. i was very vexed by the fact parcells and the o-coordinator didnt devise some sort of protection package/scheme to counter the blitz pressure of the eagles. i surely thought after halftime things would look different. i was as frustrated as TO watching some of the throws and opportunities the boys had yesterday. i think they had some great chances to make great plays, but just didnt (whether it was protection, qb, etc). TO did his part, and i think parcells did a good job of run-balancing early and shifting the focus away from TO getting the ball. TO took a lot of flak on some of the routes and picks, but i think his competitive frustrations aside, he did make contact with his qb on the sidelines and stay in the game. i definitely thought on 1st and goal he was open as he slanted into the end zone. in the end, an extremely entertaining game, i hate mcfagg getting his bombs to connect and TO not getting a chance to make his work. i look forward to the christmas rematch. eagles fans have a lot to celebrate---a tough division win with the icing of beating TO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofMeanMachine99 1 Posted October 9, 2006 awesome game! was really weird to start, kind of topsy-turvy with the different turnovers and scoring (bledsoe a 7yd run??!!) the eagles blitz package/strategy was spot on, and obviously made a terrible outing for drew; yet, the eagles offense/run game couldnt ice the game when it needed, and the boys actually had a chance with 1 minute to go on the 5yd yd line. wow. mcfagg did look broke on several throws, and his receivers missed a lot of makeable catches in the short and intermediate ranges (lj smith in particular); but, he took his chances/shots deep and it paid off big time. i just wished the boys had tried more of it. i was very vexed by the fact parcells and the o-coordinator didnt devise some sort of protection package/scheme to counter the blitz pressure of the eagles. i surely thought after halftime things would look different. i was as frustrated as TO watching some of the throws and opportunities the boys had yesterday. i think they had some great chances to make great plays, but just didnt (whether it was protection, qb, etc). TO did his part, and i think parcells did a good job of run-balancing early and shifting the focus away from TO getting the ball. TO took a lot of flak on some of the routes and picks, but i think his competitive frustrations aside, he did make contact with his qb on the sidelines and stay in the game. i definitely thought on 1st and goal he was open as he slanted into the end zone. in the end, an extremely entertaining game, i hate mcfagg getting his bombs to connect and TO not getting a chance to make his work. i look forward to the christmas rematch. eagles fans have a lot to celebrate---a tough division win with the icing of beating TO. then i guess you're a fan of a team that is "mcfagg's" b!tch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Master Pain 0 Posted October 9, 2006 Hey Cowgirl oops, i mean Cowboy and T.O. fans. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. E.A.G.L.E.S. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted October 9, 2006 hard fought game, which is exactly what is to be expected from the NFC east. philly stepped up when it counted, and got the W they deserved. we simply can't make that many mistakes against a quality team and expect to win. the only positive we can take from this game is that, had we simply executed properly, the outcome never would have been in question. this is how eagles fans must have felt after the 2nd game last year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IN$TANT REPAY 11 Posted October 9, 2006 I kinda feel bad for Mo Cheeks because Billy King's given him crap to work with. Webber and Korver can't play a lick of defense, Korver can't offer any kind of weakside rebounding, Dalember is immensely talented but has no real work ethic, and Iguodala lacks a mid range game. Worst part about the situation is ownership. The owner is only worried about filling the seats and not putting together a winning team. We all know the team won't win this season, and for the team to move on, they gotta let AI go somewhere else, and the owner's gotta sell the team. I think both happen if fans stay away early on this season. Dude says the exact same thing.....all of the time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
9-Route 0 Posted October 9, 2006 then i guess you're a fan of a team that is "mcfagg's" b!tch. well, im more a TO fan. as for the cowboys being "mcfagg's ######", i distinctly remember roy williams and bradie james ripping mcfagg's jock and pick-6-ing him on the same play last yr on monday night; if anything, they're even for now.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofMeanMachine99 1 Posted October 9, 2006 well, im more a TO fan. as for the cowboys being "mcfagg's ######", i distinctly remember roy williams and bradie james ripping mcfagg's jock and pick-6-ing him on the same play last yr on monday night; if anything, they're even for now.... "McFagg" has OWNED the Cowboys throughout his career, and you're saying the one loss he had (based on the INT) trumps all of the beatings he's given the Clownboys over the years? Are your arms tired from reaching so much? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted October 9, 2006 Wrong. They couldn't stop McNabb. Every time the Cowboys did anything the Eagles O struck right back and took the lead. Sure, the Cowboys could have won but let's not get ridiculous that it could have been a blow-out. The Eagles O was better than the Cowboys D, the Eagles D was better than the Cowboys O. I agree, the speculation that Dallas could have blown the Igs out is crazy. Hell, we were lucky to not be down 17 or 21 points in the first quarter. But once the initial energy surge let up a bit, we pretty much took control of the rest of the first half. But, as is our usual, we got our asses kicked in the 3rd quarter - and it obviously carried over to the fourth. But, even with all of this - we still had a ridiculously great chance to tie it up at the end of the game. And the reason for this I believe was our run defense. We completely shut down the Igs in this department and it was the primiary reason McNabb and co. were not able to sustain any really long drives. If you look at it, the Igs had 354 yards passing - 187 of that came on 3 plays. But it's still not to take anything away from the Igs offense, they stepped up and made plays - but I think it's a bit decieving for some to suggest we got totally manhandled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Byars41 0 Posted October 9, 2006 McNabb is sick. That pass he had to Baskett for the TD and another beauty on the TD to Reggie Brown way to step it up 5. awesome game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted October 10, 2006 McNabb is sick. That pass he had to Baskett for the TD and another beauty on the TD to Reggie Brown way to step it up 5. awesome game. the pass to baskett was good. as for the pass to brown, you don't understand what to look for. there's an old saying: "an underthrow makes a hero out of a burnt cornerback." case in point--the late interception by lito, who was badly beaten by owens on the play. sheppard was nevertheless a hero when he picked off the underthrown pass. the reverse is true on the TD to brown. it was a borderline poor decision by mcnabb to even throw it, as williams had not bitten on the flea-flicker. the throw itself was terrible, and absolutely should have been picked off by williams, who wound up mistracking it. the points and the final score stands, but don't laud a guy for poor execution that happens to turn out OK. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofMeanMachine99 1 Posted October 10, 2006 the pass to baskett was good. as for the pass to brown, you don't understand what to look for. there's an old saying: "an underthrow makes a hero out of a burnt cornerback." case in point--the late interception by lito, who was badly beaten by owens on the play. sheppard was nevertheless a hero when he picked off the underthrown pass. the reverse is true on the TD to brown. it was a borderline poor decision by mcnabb to even throw it, as williams had not bitten on the flea-flicker. the throw itself was terrible, and absolutely should have been picked off by williams, who wound up mistracking it. the points and the final score stands, but don't laud a guy for poor execution that happens to turn out OK. The last INT by Sheppard happened on a pass to Jason Witten, dumbazz. Witten was covered. The Eagles had coverage in front of Witten, with Trotter behind Witten, which forced Bledsoe to try and stick it in there, hence the wide left throw into the waiting arms of Sheppard. Oh, and the flea flicker to Brown, the ball was right on the money. Over the shoulder, right in his hands, right on stride. Williams missed it because it was a perfectly thrown ball. Maybe you should try actually watching the game first before you comment on it, genius. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted October 10, 2006 The last INT by Sheppard happened on a pass to Jason Witten, dumbazz. Witten was covered. The Eagles had coverage in front of Witten, with Trotter behind Witten, which forced Bledsoe to try and stick it in there, hence the wide left throw into the waiting arms of Sheppard. Oh, and the flea flicker to Brown, the ball was right on the money. Over the shoulder, right in his hands, right on stride. Williams missed it because it was a perfectly thrown ball. Maybe you should try actually watching the game first before you comment on it, genius. i said the "late" INT, not the "last". it might help you to be accurate when you're being acerbic. i would hope that you know that i was referring to the owens attempt, because i included the name "owens". i can be even more specific, if this still eludes you. as for the brown TD, you're letting homerism blind you, and this surprises me--you're normally a very astute observer. the ball was perfectly targeted, but a perfectly targeted pass into coverage is still a bad pass. the ball floated, williams clearly had the angle, and was closing easily until he lost technique and opened his shoulders too early. find a replay and watch it again. note the slight wobble in the spiral, which caused it to hang up. when you coach DBs to defend a spot throw, which is what this was, you teach them to go to the receiver and then come back to the ball--the "never stop running" theory. williams didn't do this, and cost dallas a TD. and as for me "watching the game", you might want to correct your own error first. on the LAST interception, the pass was wide right, not left. witten curled inside (left), and the pass was outside (right), which allowed sheppard to pick it off. again, accuracy counts. especially when you're attempting to correct someone. i await your "but i meant the defense's left" reply. try not to splutter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Polecat 0 Posted October 10, 2006 as for the pass to brown, you don't understand what to look for.the reverse is true on the TD to brown. it was a borderline poor decision by mcnabb to even throw it, as williams had not bitten on the flea-flicker. the throw itself was terrible, and absolutely should have been picked off by williams, who wound up mistracking it. You must be a real expert because Hall-of-Fame QB Steve Young called it the throw of the week on the MNF pre-game show. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofMeanMachine99 1 Posted October 10, 2006 i said the "late" INT, not the "last". it might help you to be accurate when you're being acerbic. i would hope that you know that i was referring to the owens attempt, because i included the name "owens". i can be even more specific, if this still eludes you. as for the brown TD, you're letting homerism blind you, and this surprises me--you're normally a very astute observer. the ball was perfectly targeted, but a perfectly targeted pass into coverage is still a bad pass. the ball floated, williams clearly had the angle, and was closing easily until he lost technique and opened his shoulders too early. find a replay and watch it again. note the slight wobble in the spiral, which caused it to hang up. when you coach DBs to defend a spot throw, which is what this was, you teach them to go to the receiver and then come back to the ball--the "never stop running" theory. williams didn't do this, and cost dallas a TD. and as for me "watching the game", you might want to correct your own error first. on the LAST interception, the pass was wide right, not left. witten curled inside (left), and the pass was outside (right), which allowed sheppard to pick it off. again, accuracy counts. especially when you're attempting to correct someone. i await your "but i meant the defense's left" reply. try not to splutter. Maybe you should have said "the first interception" rather than used the word "late" when referring to it. btw, Owens was in the general vicinity of the throw. Some other poster also pointed this out to you, yet I don't see you responding to correct them. The Brown ball was perfect. Williams arrived late to the ball (as usual). It's real hard for an athlete to open up to the ball and deflect/pick the throw on the dead run, especially when he's going against his body. We can agree to disagree because the throw was perfect. Takes a perfect play to break up a perfect throw, IMO. Lastly, the pass was thrown wide left of the receiver (from his perspective). Trotter had him covered on Witten's right side (behind him), with undercoverage by the hash, safety help in that half of the field, and Sheppard had Witten's left side. If Bledsoe throws the ball closer to the middle, it gets deflected/picked by Trotter and/or the undercoverage. Bledsoe had to find a hole within the zone, and he just didn't make the perfect throw (to Witten's left). No "uh's" or "i meant to's" chief. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted October 10, 2006 Maybe you should have said "the first interception" rather than used the word "late" when referring to it. contextual reading comprehension is a basic indicator of intelligence. i don't doubt that you are an intelligent guy, so this obviously means that you felt like quibbling. to defend yourself, you threw out the following red herring: Some other poster also pointed this out to you, yet I don't see you responding to correct them. my first post on this issue came in early this morning. read the last 5 posts. you are wrong. man up and admit it. We can agree to disagree because the throw was perfect. i can live with this. i don't agree, having coached all of the positions involved, but i can accept a difference of opinion. Takes a perfect play to break up a perfect throw, IMO. i strongly disagree with this. a perfect throw can't be broken up--to have the label of 'perfect', it must be executed in such a way that either the receiver catches it, or no one does. if a defender has any chance at all, the throw is not perfect. Lastly, the pass was thrown wide left of the receiver (from his perspective). as expected, the "i meant if you looked at in the other way" disclaimer. all offensive terminology is built around the orientation of the snap. the pass was thrown too far to the right. period. from witten's perspective, the pass was thrown "outside", or "to his left". in the same way, a missed field goal is recorded "wide right", not "to the left of the defense (from their perspective)". Trotter had him covered on Witten's right side (behind him), with undercoverage by the hash, safety help in that half of the field, and Sheppard had Witten's left side. If Bledsoe throws the ball closer to the middle, it gets deflected/picked by Trotter and/or the undercoverage. Bledsoe had to find a hole within the zone, and he just didn't make the perfect throw (to Witten's left). all true--it was a throw that should not have been made. but it is a red herring with regards to the directionality of the play. you're wrong and you know it. when i make a mistake, i acknowledge it and move on. as a guy i generally respect, i would hope that you'd do the same. i hate to be wrong about people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,439 Posted October 10, 2006 I agree, the speculation that Dallas could have blown the Igs out is crazy. Hell, we were lucky to not be down 17 or 21 points in the first quarter. But once the initial energy surge let up a bit, we pretty much took control of the rest of the first half. But, as is our usual, we got our asses kicked in the 3rd quarter - and it obviously carried over to the fourth. But, even with all of this - we still had a ridiculously great chance to tie it up at the end of the game. And the reason for this I believe was our run defense. We completely shut down the Igs in this department and it was the primiary reason McNabb and co. were not able to sustain any really long drives. If you look at it, the Igs had 354 yards passing - 187 of that came on 3 plays. But it's still not to take anything away from the Igs offense, they stepped up and made plays - but I think it's a bit decieving for some to suggest we got totally manhandled. The Cowboys did not get manhandled, but the better team on the field Sunday clearly won. The Eagles beat Dallas in the trenches on both sides of the ball and McNabb was far superior to Bledsoe - that's an understatement. The final score was pretty much indicative of the way the game went - Dallas hung tough in the first half but Philly took over in the second. End of story. Best part is we get to replay it late in the year. Hopefully the game will mean something for both teams. Eagles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted October 10, 2006 The Cowboys did not get manhandled, but the better team on the field Sunday clearly won. The Eagles beat Dallas in the trenches on both sides of the ball and McNabb was far superior to Bledsoe - that's an understatement. The final score was pretty much indicative of the way the game went - Dallas hung tough in the first half but Philly took over in the second. End of story. Best part is we get to replay it late in the year. Hopefully the game will mean something for both teams. i can't argue with this at all. in crunch time, the eagles made plays and the cowboys didn't. period. i can't wait for the x-mas game. [edit to remove eagles celebratory emo] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cowboyz 2 Posted October 10, 2006 http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story...mp;lid=tab2pos3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagles Green 34 Posted October 11, 2006 Cowboys will take the banged up Eagles by 10. T.O will get 145 yards and 2 Td's this week Eagle fans You will get what u fools deserve up there in cheesesteak country. A good O'l Texas butt whipping from yours truely Terrell Owens Fox should never let a sign like that make the air.... On a side note, for the last two seasons when the Iggles were on their high and mighty train there were plenty of Iggles fans like Eagles Green, MDC and Yoda the Pug (could be wrong) and others that spewed high levels of Cowboys hate filled venom. Now that the birds wings are broken and they are all hurt, some want a truce...and others are nowhere to be found. awwww here little birdie, birdie.... NEVAH!@#$%^&* my shots were not necessarily aimed at you, but at SOME of the others...and they know who they are.... I was away for a few days. Fill me in, who won the game? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IN$TANT REPAY 11 Posted October 11, 2006 Fox should never let a sign like that make the air....On a side note, for the last two seasons when the Iggles were on their high and mighty train there were plenty of Iggles fans like Eagles Green, MDC and Yoda the Pug (could be wrong) and others that spewed high levels of Cowboys hate filled venom. Now that the birds wings are broken and they are all hurt, some want a truce...and others are nowhere to be found. awwww here little birdie, birdie.... NEVAH!@#$%^&* my shots were not necessarily aimed at you, but at SOME of the others...and they know who they are.... I was away for a few days. Fill me in, who won the game? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagles Green 34 Posted October 11, 2006 Turn that frown upside-down. At least TO looked good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MissionCoach 4 Posted October 11, 2006 http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story...mp;lid=tab2pos3 That was the funniest fricken' thing I've read in a long while McNabb: Ha-ha. Zero catches at halftime. Now don't go OD on painkillers T.O.: That's insensitive. Many Eagles fans are probably on painkillers McNabb: Good point. SorryT.O.: Kidding. That's not what happened anyway. I had 2 go 2 the hospital cuz I ate a can of your nasty soup. Tell them every can should come w a free stomach pump T.O.: Then u probably won't like my next children's book about sharing. It's about a chubby, out of shape qb named Little D who shares with his teammates that he's nervous about the big game by throwing up on them in the huddle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofMeanMachine99 1 Posted October 11, 2006 contextual reading comprehension is a basic indicator of intelligence. i don't doubt that you are an intelligent guy, so this obviously means that you felt like quibbling. to defend yourself, you threw out the following red herring: my first post on this issue came in early this morning. read the last 5 posts. you are wrong. man up and admit it. i can live with this. i don't agree, having coached all of the positions involved, but i can accept a difference of opinion. i strongly disagree with this. a perfect throw can't be broken up--to have the label of 'perfect', it must be executed in such a way that either the receiver catches it, or no one does. if a defender has any chance at all, the throw is not perfect. as expected, the "i meant if you looked at in the other way" disclaimer. all offensive terminology is built around the orientation of the snap. the pass was thrown too far to the right. period. from witten's perspective, the pass was thrown "outside", or "to his left". in the same way, a missed field goal is recorded "wide right", not "to the left of the defense (from their perspective)". all true--it was a throw that should not have been made. but it is a red herring with regards to the directionality of the play. you're wrong and you know it. when i make a mistake, i acknowledge it and move on. as a guy i generally respect, i would hope that you'd do the same. i hate to be wrong about people. Well, we see things differently. I respect that you've coached football. I played at the D1 level as an end, so I also have a little more football background than most. I've also coached as well, so in that instance, we both know what we're looking at. So you can carry on this arguement if you'd like. Hell, you can also claim to be a know it all, too. I look at it from the field, not the TV. If you can't live with that, I don't know what to tell you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
birdbrain3X 0 Posted October 11, 2006 I can't figure out why this thread is still going. A once proud franchise that has been to the playoffs just once since '99 and is now an annual bottom-feeder despite all efforts and a HOF coach just got beat again by one of the elite teams of the millenium. Newsflash ladies... those 5 trophies are long gone, your cowtwats have sucked for a very long time now with no end in sight. I think you guys got really worked up because you beat us last year when we had 19 guys on IR but everything is back to normal now. You guys need to stop shooting for the top teams in the league and division leaders and just try making the playoffs. Just get into the postseason for once and then we'll talk. How's them 5 trophies look on that mantle girls? Keep staring at em cause you sure suck now.' We own you!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IN$TANT REPAY 11 Posted October 11, 2006 Turn that frown upside-down. At least TO looked good. All of a sudden...in a post T.O. visit, post-victory celebration world, yall are a bunch of happy-go-lucky-good samaritan-comedian-do gooders in philly. T.O. galvanized a city and caused you all to channel your positive energy into ghostbuster 2 sized pillsbury doughboy proportions and helped you all to finally become a city of brotherly love once and for all. Did flowers bloom for the first time in 25 years in Philly on Monday? ??? bring the old eagles fans back!@#$%^& this upsets the balance of nature....they way of life that we know it is in jeopardy....the world could end at noon tomorrah. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted October 11, 2006 Well, we see things differently. I respect that you've coached football. I played at the D1 level as an end, so I also have a little more football background than most. I've also coached as well, so in that instance, we both know what we're looking at. So you can carry on this arguement if you'd like. Hell, you can also claim to be a know it all, too. I look at it from the field, not the TV. If you can't live with that, I don't know what to tell you. hey bud, we're both headstrong guys who are passionate about the game, and we both looooove to argue. i've got no problem with that. as i said a couple of pages ago (before this particular subject came up)... even if he is a sorry-arsed eagles fan, i'll always respect ghost. his tenacity in these threads is inspiring--the man never gives up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagles Green 34 Posted October 11, 2006 All of a sudden...in a post T.O. visit, post-victory celebration world, yall are a bunch of happy-go-lucky-good samaritan-comedian-do gooders in philly. T.O. galvanized a city and caused you all to channel your positive energy into ghostbuster 2 sized pillsbury doughboy proportions and helped you all to finally become a city of brotherly love once and for all. Did flowers bloom for the first time in 25 years in Philly on Monday? ??? bring the old eagles fans back!@#$%^& this upsets the balance of nature....they way of life that we know it is in jeopardy....the world could end at noon tomorrah. I'm just giddy because it's fun watching TO and the Cowpukes fail. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IN$TANT REPAY 11 Posted October 11, 2006 I'm just giddy because it's fun watching TO and the Cowpukes fail. don't worry, i have a funny feeling that the eagles will lose to the saints this weekend.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
9-Route 0 Posted October 11, 2006 "McFagg" has OWNED the Cowboys throughout his career, and you're saying the one loss he had (based on the INT) trumps all of the beatings he's given the Clownboys over the years? Are your arms tired from reaching so much? i dont know about the history of these 2 teams, as i said, im not a storied boys or eagles fan; however, like i mentioned, the only games that come to mind in recent memory are: boys throwing deep early and often aka the terry glenn show, boys win 33-10; birds with TO on monday night, TO makes me happy, 134-3, birds win big; boys win at end on roy's pick-6 and donovan injured on same throw/play. so, these 3 games must all be within the last 4 played between the teams (last 2 seasons). so, to me, it seems even for now/recent memory. as an eagles fan, im sure you track longer for 'recent memory'. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofMeanMachine99 1 Posted October 11, 2006 i dont know about the history of these 2 teams, as i said, im not a storied boys or eagles fan; however, like i mentioned, the only games that come to mind in recent memory are: boys throwing deep early and often aka the terry glenn show, boys win 33-10; birds with TO on monday night, TO makes me happy, 134-3, birds win big; boys win at end on roy's pick-6 and donovan injured on same throw/play. so, these 3 games must all be within the last 4 played between the teams (last 2 seasons). so, to me, it seems even for now/recent memory. as an eagles fan, im sure you track longer for 'recent memory'. Donnie Mac's owned the Cowboys. However, take it with a grain of salt because the Cowboys were pretty bad pre-parcells during the early years of McNabb's career. With the exception of last year, he's owned the Cowboys. For some reason (and Cowboy fans have said as much) he plays well against them. Really shocked at the high level of play this season, but not surprised. He's always had it in him, and he's always shown glimpses of that talent. I hope he can maintain his high level of play. I'm sure he'll throw in a clunker, too. Most QBs normally do. When he does, I will not be surprised to see haters jump on and say "see, I told you he sucks". As an Eagle's fan, I want them to win it all. However, as a realist, I understand how tough that can be, yet I still take alot of enjoyment from watching him play. It also helps that he's a stand up guy with a real, down to earth personality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mackgee 0 Posted December 28, 2006 The Cowboys did not get manhandled, but the better team on the field Sunday clearly won. The Eagles beat Dallas in the trenches on both sides of the ball and McNabb was far superior to Bledsoe - that's an understatement. The final score was pretty much indicative of the way the game went - Dallas hung tough in the first half but Philly took over in the second. End of story. Best part is we get to replay it late in the year. Hopefully the game will mean something for both teams. Eagles. Yep appeared after another Eagles win with nothing to say before the game. As usual. FAIR WEATHER Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,439 Posted December 28, 2006 Yep appeared after another Eagles win with nothing to say before the game. As usual. FAIR WEATHER 1. I had a thread about the game on the Geek Board. 2. You are a Bucs fan but you never talk about the Bucs. Owned as usual, you little b1tch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites