Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 5, 2006 Wow! This Foley thing has exposed the libs on this board like never before. Prior to this situation if anyone here would say anything disparaging about a homosexual the libs would jump all over them as being a homophobic bible thumping neo-con. But all the sudden it is OK to slam a homosexual as a "phag" and other such labels. I love it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heavy-set 39 Posted October 6, 2006 you labeled us as consistent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,413 Posted October 6, 2006 I realize this is just giving fuel to your stupidity, but here goes: Since when has anyone here ever objected to the term f@g? I personally know more than one f@g and they all refer to themselves and other f@gs as f@gs. The other day a gay guy I know from work introduced a bunch of his friends to me as "the b1tches." Nice try though. You almost had me convinced that congressional Republicans covering up for a pervert who sponsored legislation to defend kids from sexual predators had something to do with liberal hypocrisy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PackerAttacker 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Totally unrelated... but oh well http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLFCifVMfZE Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 I realize this is just giving fuel to your stupidity, but here goes: Since when has anyone here ever objected to the term f@g? I personally know more than one f@g and they all refer to themselves and other f@gs as f@gs. The other day a gay guy I know from work introduced a bunch of his friends to me as "the b1tches." Nice try though. You almost had me convinced that congressional Republicans covering up for a pervert who sponsored legislation to defend kids from sexual predators had something to do with liberal hypocrisy. Hey, that's the circles you run around in.................not that there's anything wrong with that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,413 Posted October 6, 2006 Hey, that's the circles you run around in.................not that there's anything wrong with that. At least I don't cover up for grown men who want to fock little boys. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snoopy1 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Wow! This Foley thing has exposed the libs on this board like never before. Prior to this situation if anyone here would say anything disparaging about a homosexual the libs would jump all over them as being a homophobic bible thumping neo-con. But all the sudden it is OK to slam a homosexual as a "phag" and other such labels. I love it! homosexual <> pedophile RP = Stupidity HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 At least I don't cover up for grown men who want to fock little boys. Who does? homosexual <> pedophile RP = Stupidity HTH Snoopy: Phag = pedophile. Snoopy = idiot. HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,413 Posted October 6, 2006 Who does? Congressional Republicans and you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FranksTanks 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Link to where anyone says this guy should have stepped down because he was gay? You are a HUGE idiot if you think that what everyone is up in arms about that. You're just making sh!t up? I can't believe this. again, to repeat what was posted above: homosexual <> pedophile/inapproriate/underage/cover-up.etc...... RP = Stupidity HTH How do you come up with this crap RP? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 Congressional Republicans and you. Are you on crack? Please show me where if have tried to "cover up for grown men who want to fock little boys"......for that matter please show me where I have done anything but condemn them. Idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heavy-set 39 Posted October 6, 2006 Idiot. there you go labeling people again Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,413 Posted October 6, 2006 Are you on crack? Please show me where if have tried to "cover up for grown men who want to fock little boys"......for that matter please show me where I have done anything but condemn them. Idiot. You keep blasting the Dems for being hypocrites but you haven't said anything about House Republicans who covered up for a sexual predator for political gain, probably because deep down you want to screw little boys, too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 Link to where anyone says this guy should have stepped down because he was gay? OK Frank, I'll restate my position because you are slower than the other libs on this board, which should be embarrassing to you: The libs on this board who would chastise (that means condemn) anyone who used the term "phag" when referring to a homosexual are now using that exact term when referring to Foley. I submit this is further evidence of a double-standard. Do you have anything to prove otherwise? I mean besides name calling. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
De Novo 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Link to where anyone says this guy should have stepped down because he was gay? You are a HUGE idiot if you think that what everyone is up in arms about that. You're just making sh!t up? I can't believe this. again, to repeat what was posted above: homosexual <> pedophile/inapproriate/underage/cover-up.etc...... RP = Stupidity HTH How do you come up with this crap RP? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 You keep blasting the Dems for being hypocrites but you haven't said anything about House Republicans who covered up for a sexual predator for political gain, probably because deep down you want to screw little boys, too. You are wrong yet again. I have already addressed the alleged cover up. I will wait for the facts to come out, not rely on Nancy Pelosi and MDC. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D'ohmer Simpson 0 Posted October 6, 2006 In Britain they refer to cigarettes as phags Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,413 Posted October 6, 2006 I stick up for pedophiles and the people who protect them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FranksTanks 0 Posted October 6, 2006 OK Frank, I'll restate my position because you are slower than the other libs on this board, which should be embarrassing to you: The libs on this board who would chastise (that means condemn) anyone who used the term "phag" when referring to a homosexual are now using that exact term when referring to Foley. I submit this is further evidence of a double-standard. Do you have anything to prove otherwise? I mean besides name calling. Ok, I searched the word "phag" in the Geek Club and this is the only thread about Foley that contains that word. Who's slow now? YOU'RE MAKING SH!T UP! Did you catch that jackass? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 Almost three years as a member and nearly 13,000 posts, and you still resort to lame quote manipulation, and I do mean lame because I have seen some funny stuff.............. Congrats, you should be proud of yourself because you have done nothing but prove my original point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snoopy1 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Ok, I searched the word "phag" in the Geek Club and this is the only thread about Foley that contains that word. Who's slow now? YOU'RE MAKING SH!T UP! Did you catch that jackass? RP making up evidence. No way, I can't believe it, it's unpossible! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Uh-huh 0 Posted October 6, 2006 OK Frank, I'll restate my position because you are slower than the other libs on this board, which should be embarrassing to you: The libs on this board who would chastise (that means condemn) anyone who used the term "phag" when referring to a homosexual are now using that exact term when referring to Foley. I submit this is further evidence of a double-standard. Do you have anything to prove otherwise? I mean besides name calling. Recliner Pilot knows a lot about double standards and (in)consistency. He practices both religiously. He is consistent in one thing: hypocrisy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,907 Posted October 6, 2006 Does anyone here not own a piece of RP? I have to hand it to him. He gets beat down daily and every night he's back posting his lies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Greedo 13 Posted October 6, 2006 Anyone seen a link for this supposed lib name-calling? That might make the original claim less stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 Lessee, first up to bat to be owned: Why don't we make it Cdumb himself: "What a ###### sicko. Nice job Reptards Makes you wonder if all these homo hating Rep's are closet f@gs" http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...239076&st=0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davebg 0 Posted October 6, 2006 I realize this is just giving fuel to your stupidity, but here goes: Since when has anyone here ever objected to the term f@g? I personally know more than one f@g and they all refer to themselves and other f@gs as f@gs. The other day a gay guy I know from work introduced a bunch of his friends to me as "the b1tches." Nice try though. You almost had me convinced that congressional Republicans covering up for a pervert who sponsored legislation to defend kids from sexual predators had something to do with liberal hypocrisy. While I disagree w/RP's post...not to mention the fact that he neglects to mention the whole underage thang in this discussion...this is one of the dumber posts you've had of late, MDC. I mean, black people use the N word to refer to each other all the time. Does that mean you are going to start using it? If you went up to a group of gays in your office and introduced them as the "f@g b|tches" how long do you think it would be before your ass was called down to HR? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tony hardware 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Totally unrelated... but oh well http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLFCifVMfZE Old School Hollywood. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted October 6, 2006 Dood, not to be a spelling Nazi or anything, but if you're going to keep making threads about it, it's "consistency". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 Dood, not to be a spelling Nazi or anything, but if you're going to keep making threads about it, it's "consistency". You may now unbunch your panties, it has been corrected. Oh, and it's "dude". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted October 6, 2006 You may now unbunch your panties, it has been corrected. Oh, and it's "dude". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 Sorry dood, but you are next up to bat: parrot Yesterday, 02:10 PM Post #5 FF Geek Group: Members Posts: 11101 Joined: 30-July 02 Member No.: 13082 Hey, it's worth a shot... Drudge needs to catch up, the latest spin is to try and deflect blame on to upper-level gay staffers for enabling/shielding Foley. Blame the f@gs, even if the f@gs are Republicans. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted October 6, 2006 Sorry dood, but you are next up to bat: parrot Yesterday, 02:10 PM Post #5 FF Geek Group: Members Posts: 11101 Joined: 30-July 02 Member No.: 13082 Hey, it's worth a shot... Drudge needs to catch up, the latest spin is to try and deflect blame on to upper-level gay staffers for enabling/shielding Foley. Blame the f@gs, even if the f@gs are Republicans. Actually, I was paraphrasing the GOP position on this one and how they might characterize it, but that's neither here nor there... Two problems here; I'm not a lib. I'm an individual liberties/small gov't Goldwater conservative, and I believe my expressed views are generally is keeping with this philosophy. Please post a position I hold and describe why it's Liberal. Provide support. Then go ahead and post where I've ever chastised someone for using the term f@g or some variation thereof. Until then, stfu. TIA! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Korben Dallas 0 Posted October 6, 2006 So RP, when are you coming up with this link that shows liberals outraged at Foley's orientation? So far you've managed to come up with Parrot pointing out the GOP talking point, and Uh-huh pointing out that the GOP, who pretends to abhor homosexuality-seems to have several working for them. Neither are the point you attempted to make. I haven't seen a single person object to his orientation (as a liberal), but plenty have objected to his sexual predator behavior. I don't use that word, no differently that the n word or any other epithat. But go right ahead and continue to avoid the point. The leader of children protection for the GOP was a pedophile and the house leadership knew and covered it up AND CONTINUES TO DO SO BY AVOIDING A REAL INVESTIGATION The only question is whether is was for 9 months or 5 years. Which doesn't really matter to me all that much. Both are equally bad.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 So RP, when are you coming up with this link that shows liberals outraged at Foley's orientation? As soon as you come up with a link showing me making that claim. Idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Korben Dallas 0 Posted October 6, 2006 As soon as you come up with a link showing me making that claim. Idiot. Isn't that your point in THIS thread? That liberals are calling him names. Wait, nevermind, you don't have a point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 Isn't that your point in THIS thread? That liberals are calling him names. Nope. And if you can't figure it out on your own I won't waste my time trying to explain it to you. My original post is pretty clear and simple. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
De Novo 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Nope. And if you can't figure it out on your own I won't waste my time trying to explain it to you. My original post is pretty clear and simple. You're a focking moron. Seriously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 You're a focking moron. Seriously. The thread is about being consistent, idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Korben Dallas 0 Posted October 6, 2006 The thread is about being consistent, idiot. Yes, and you were unable to prove the most simple point. Which is consistent. That you are a tool. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 6, 2006 Yes, and you were unable to prove the most simple point. This coming from the idiot who claims my sig "supports corruption". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites