Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Recliner Pilot

Even more lib "consistency"

Recommended Posts

Wow!

 

This Foley thing has exposed the libs on this board like never before. Prior to this situation if anyone here would say anything disparaging about a homosexual the libs would jump all over them as being a homophobic bible thumping neo-con.

 

But all the sudden it is OK to slam a homosexual as a "phag" and other such labels.

 

I love it!

 

 

:first:

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I realize this is just giving fuel to your stupidity, but here goes: Since when has anyone here ever objected to the term f@g? I personally know more than one f@g and they all refer to themselves and other f@gs as f@gs. The other day a gay guy I know from work introduced a bunch of his friends to me as "the b1tches." Nice try though. You almost had me convinced that congressional Republicans covering up for a pervert who sponsored legislation to defend kids from sexual predators had something to do with liberal hypocrisy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I realize this is just giving fuel to your stupidity, but here goes: Since when has anyone here ever objected to the term f@g? I personally know more than one f@g and they all refer to themselves and other f@gs as f@gs. The other day a gay guy I know from work introduced a bunch of his friends to me as "the b1tches." Nice try though. You almost had me convinced that congressional Republicans covering up for a pervert who sponsored legislation to defend kids from sexual predators had something to do with liberal hypocrisy.

 

 

Hey, that's the circles you run around in.................not that there's anything wrong with that. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey, that's the circles you run around in.................not that there's anything wrong with that. :lol:

 

At least I don't cover up for grown men who want to fock little boys. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow!

 

This Foley thing has exposed the libs on this board like never before. Prior to this situation if anyone here would say anything disparaging about a homosexual the libs would jump all over them as being a homophobic bible thumping neo-con.

 

But all the sudden it is OK to slam a homosexual as a "phag" and other such labels.

 

I love it!

:lol:

:banana:

 

 

homosexual <> pedophile

 

RP = Stupidity

 

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At least I don't cover up for grown men who want to fock little boys. :banana:

 

Who does?

 

 

 

 

homosexual <> pedophile

 

RP = Stupidity

 

HTH

 

Snoopy: Phag = pedophile.

 

Snoopy = idiot.

 

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to where anyone says this guy should have stepped down because he was gay?

You are a HUGE idiot if you think that what everyone is up in arms about that. You're just making sh!t up? I can't believe this.

 

again, to repeat what was posted above:

 

homosexual <> pedophile/inapproriate/underage/cover-up.etc......

 

RP = Stupidity

 

HTH

 

How do you come up with this crap RP? :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Congressional Republicans and you. :banana: :lol: :lol:

 

 

Are you on crack?

 

Please show me where if have tried to "cover up for grown men who want to fock little boys"......for that matter please show me where I have done anything but condemn them.

 

Idiot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you on crack?

 

Please show me where if have tried to "cover up for grown men who want to fock little boys"......for that matter please show me where I have done anything but condemn them.

 

Idiot.

 

You keep blasting the Dems for being hypocrites but you haven't said anything about House Republicans who covered up for a sexual predator for political gain, probably because deep down you want to screw little boys, too.

 

:cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Link to where anyone says this guy should have stepped down because he was gay?

 

OK Frank, I'll restate my position because you are slower than the other libs on this board, which should be embarrassing to you:

 

The libs on this board who would chastise (that means condemn) :cheers: anyone who used the term "phag" when referring to a homosexual are now using that exact term when referring to Foley.

 

I submit this is further evidence of a double-standard.

 

Do you have anything to prove otherwise? I mean besides name calling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Link to where anyone says this guy should have stepped down because he was gay?

You are a HUGE idiot if you think that what everyone is up in arms about that. You're just making sh!t up? I can't believe this.

 

again, to repeat what was posted above:

 

homosexual <> pedophile/inapproriate/underage/cover-up.etc......

 

RP = Stupidity

 

HTH

 

How do you come up with this crap RP? :wacko:

 

:cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You keep blasting the Dems for being hypocrites but you haven't said anything about House Republicans who covered up for a sexual predator for political gain, probably because deep down you want to screw little boys, too.

 

:cheers:

 

You are wrong yet again. I have already addressed the alleged cover up. I will wait for the facts to come out, not rely on Nancy Pelosi and MDC. :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I stick up for pedophiles and the people who protect them.

 

 

:wall: :( :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK Frank, I'll restate my position because you are slower than the other libs on this board, which should be embarrassing to you:

 

The libs on this board who would chastise (that means condemn) :wall: anyone who used the term "phag" when referring to a homosexual are now using that exact term when referring to Foley.

 

I submit this is further evidence of a double-standard.

 

Do you have anything to prove otherwise? I mean besides name calling.

 

Ok, I searched the word "phag" in the Geek Club and this is the only thread about Foley that contains that word. Who's slow now? YOU'RE MAKING SH!T UP!

 

Did you catch that jackass?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:( :P :banana:

 

 

Almost three years as a member and nearly 13,000 posts, and you still resort to lame quote manipulation, and I do mean lame because I have seen some funny stuff..............

 

Congrats, you should be proud of yourself because you have done nothing but prove my original point.

 

:wall:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, I searched the word "phag" in the Geek Club and this is the only thread about Foley that contains that word. Who's slow now? YOU'RE MAKING SH!T UP!

 

Did you catch that jackass?

 

 

RP making up evidence. No way, I can't believe it, it's unpossible!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK Frank, I'll restate my position because you are slower than the other libs on this board, which should be embarrassing to you:

 

The libs on this board who would chastise (that means condemn) :wall: anyone who used the term "phag" when referring to a homosexual are now using that exact term when referring to Foley.

 

I submit this is further evidence of a double-standard.

 

Do you have anything to prove otherwise? I mean besides name calling.

 

Recliner Pilot knows a lot about double standards and (in)consistency.

 

He practices both religiously.

 

He is consistent in one thing: hypocrisy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone here not own a piece of RP? I have to hand it to him. He gets beat down daily and every night he's back posting his lies.

 

:wall:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone seen a link for this supposed lib name-calling? That might make the original claim less stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I realize this is just giving fuel to your stupidity, but here goes: Since when has anyone here ever objected to the term f@g? I personally know more than one f@g and they all refer to themselves and other f@gs as f@gs. The other day a gay guy I know from work introduced a bunch of his friends to me as "the b1tches." Nice try though. You almost had me convinced that congressional Republicans covering up for a pervert who sponsored legislation to defend kids from sexual predators had something to do with liberal hypocrisy.

While I disagree w/RP's post...not to mention the fact that he neglects to mention the whole underage thang in this discussion...this is one of the dumber posts you've had of late, MDC.

 

I mean, black people use the N word to refer to each other all the time. Does that mean you are going to start using it? If you went up to a group of gays in your office and introduced them as the "f@g b|tches" how long do you think it would be before your ass was called down to HR?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dood, not to be a spelling Nazi or anything, but if you're going to keep making threads about it, it's "consistency".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dood, not to be a spelling Nazi or anything, but if you're going to keep making threads about it, it's "consistency".

 

You may now unbunch your panties, it has been corrected.

 

Oh, and it's "dude". :angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You may now unbunch your panties, it has been corrected.

 

Oh, and it's "dude". :D

:angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry dood, but you are next up to bat: :thumbsup:

 

parrot Yesterday, 02:10 PM Post #5

 

 

FF Geek

 

 

Group: Members

Posts: 11101

Joined: 30-July 02

Member No.: 13082

 

 

 

Hey, it's worth a shot...

 

Drudge needs to catch up, the latest spin is to try and deflect blame on to upper-level gay staffers for enabling/shielding Foley. Blame the f@gs, even if the f@gs are Republicans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry dood, but you are next up to bat: :thumbsup:

 

parrot Yesterday, 02:10 PM Post #5

FF Geek

Group: Members

Posts: 11101

Joined: 30-July 02

Member No.: 13082

Hey, it's worth a shot...

 

Drudge needs to catch up, the latest spin is to try and deflect blame on to upper-level gay staffers for enabling/shielding Foley. Blame the f@gs, even if the f@gs are Republicans.

Actually, I was paraphrasing the GOP position on this one and how they might characterize it, but that's neither here nor there...

 

Two problems here; I'm not a lib. I'm an individual liberties/small gov't Goldwater conservative, and I believe my expressed views are generally is keeping with this philosophy. Please post a position I hold and describe why it's Liberal. Provide support. Then go ahead and post where I've ever chastised someone for using the term f@g or some variation thereof. Until then, stfu. TIA!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So RP, when are you coming up with this link that shows liberals outraged at Foley's orientation?

 

So far you've managed to come up with Parrot pointing out the GOP talking point, and Uh-huh pointing out that the GOP, who pretends to abhor homosexuality-seems to have several working for them.

 

Neither are the point you attempted to make. I haven't seen a single person object to his orientation (as a liberal), but plenty have objected to his sexual predator behavior.

 

I don't use that word, no differently that the n word or any other epithat. But go right ahead and continue to avoid the point.

 

The leader of children protection for the GOP was a pedophile and the house leadership knew and covered it up AND CONTINUES TO DO SO BY AVOIDING A REAL INVESTIGATION

 

The only question is whether is was for 9 months or 5 years. Which doesn't really matter to me all that much. Both are equally bad....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So RP, when are you coming up with this link that shows liberals outraged at Foley's orientation?

 

As soon as you come up with a link showing me making that claim.

 

Idiot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As soon as you come up with a link showing me making that claim.

 

Idiot.

 

Isn't that your point in THIS thread? That liberals are calling him names.

 

Wait, nevermind, you don't have a point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Isn't that your point in THIS thread? That liberals are calling him names.

 

Nope. And if you can't figure it out on your own I won't waste my time trying to explain it to you. My original post is pretty clear and simple. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nope. And if you can't figure it out on your own I won't waste my time trying to explain it to you. My original post is pretty clear and simple. :bench:

 

You're a focking moron. Seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The thread is about being consistent, idiot. :thumbsdown:

 

Yes, and you were unable to prove the most simple point.

 

Which is consistent. That you are a tool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×