famousb 11 Posted July 6, 2007 heard there are a bunch of cars and a UHaul truck parked on his lawn and that it is another federal raid... wow, another raid after all this time?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The_Mad_Cats 0 Posted July 6, 2007 Must be looking for dust bunnies and tumbleweeds at this late date. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 133 Posted July 6, 2007 heard there are a bunch of cars and a UHaul truck parked on his lawn and that it is another federal raid... wow, another raid after all this time?? The idiot and his pack propably thought the heat was off, and fired things up again. His posse was probably needing some "scratch". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 364 Posted July 6, 2007 Let's all take a second, breathe deeply, and place the blame squarely on the shoulders of the truly deserving. It's completely the dogs fault. Stupid dogs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
famousb 11 Posted July 6, 2007 The idiot and his pack propably thought the heat was off, and fired things up again. His posse was probably needing some "scratch". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
football_scooter 0 Posted July 6, 2007 why they gotta keep doggin him like that? I guess they've got him on a pretty short leash now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jarvis Basnight 119 Posted July 6, 2007 A rape stand? A treadmill modified for dogs. that's some funny chit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
famousb 11 Posted July 6, 2007 why they gotta keep doggin him like that? I guess they've got him on a pretty short leash now. what, you couldn't fit in the fact you think the Feds are barking up the wrong tree?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
football_scooter 0 Posted July 6, 2007 A rape stand? You mean everyone doesn't have one of these at home? hrm...guess it's just Vick, me & phillybear. what, you couldn't fit in the fact you think the Feds are barking up the wrong tree?? I think Vick's lawyer will argue that they're chasing their own tails on this one. One thing's for certain - every dog has his day & Vick is no exception. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
famousb 11 Posted July 6, 2007 I think Vick's lawyer will argue that they're chasing their own tails on this one. One thing's for certain - every dog has his day & Vick is no exception. dog-gone-it you're funny... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The_Mad_Cats 0 Posted July 6, 2007 This thread's gone to the dogs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yostevo 0 Posted July 6, 2007 Apparently they are searching for pocket presence and accuracy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jeremy 0 Posted July 6, 2007 Apparently they are searching for pocket presence and accuracy. I don't think there's enough evidence of that to justify a search warrant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted July 6, 2007 I was going to add something witty and clever but as I scrolled down the page I kept seeing my newest idea had already been used. I think you covered it guys, well done Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jarvis Basnight 119 Posted July 6, 2007 You mean everyone doesn't have one of these at home? hrm...guess it's just Vick, me & phillybear. So what hurts more, the tight straps holding you into position or receiving your punishment? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GobbleDog 816 Posted July 6, 2007 Didn't they inform the media prior to the last time they wanted to search his place for buried animals? I'm surprised there's anything left besides a bunch of holes in the ground. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
football_scooter 0 Posted July 6, 2007 So what hurts more, the tight straps holding you into position or receiving your punishment? zing! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted July 6, 2007 New meaning to "the dog days of summer." ? ...That's all I got. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
famousb 11 Posted July 6, 2007 New meaning to "the dog days of summer." ? ...That's all I got. that one was a little ruff... but if you need a little help, maybe i can throw you a bone... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted July 6, 2007 that one was a little ruff... I hadn't been owned in awhile. Nice job that one was a little ruff... but if you need a little help, maybe i can throw you a bone... I'd appreciate the help. Don't make me beg. I gotta stop. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
famousb 11 Posted July 6, 2007 I hadn't been owned in awhile. Nice job I'd appreciate the help. Don't make me beg. I gotta stop. well i'm not just going to rollover and let you get the last zinger... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jarvis Basnight 119 Posted July 6, 2007 that one was a little ruff... but if you need a little help, maybe i can throw you a bone... are you guys referring to football scooter and his rape stand again? disgusting. keep that stuff to yourselves please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted July 6, 2007 What little football relevance this had in the beginning is gone now. Anyway, back to football. What does this do for Ryan Leaf's QB value this year? Still ahead of Vick? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
devilsden 0 Posted July 6, 2007 here is another link to the story http://wavy.com/Global/story.asp?S=6753469 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rounder 0 Posted July 6, 2007 I guess old Ron Mexico done screwed the pooch!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fozzy4 0 Posted July 7, 2007 What little football relevance this had in the beginning is gone now. Anyway, back to football. What does this do for Ryan Leaf's QB value this year? Still ahead of Vick? Nah, Vick is still top dog, even if only by a tail. Anyone who says differently is trying to make the tail wag the dog. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted July 7, 2007 Nah, Vick is still top dog, even if only by a tail. Anyone who says differently is trying to make the tail wag the dog. My mistake. I suppose Leaf's bark was worse than his bite. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steel City Blues 0 Posted July 7, 2007 It will tick me off if Vick posts bail and fleas. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted July 7, 2007 It will tick me off if Vick posts bail and fleas. well done Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wicked joe 0 Posted July 7, 2007 I say minimum 6 game suspension. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted July 7, 2007 I say minimum 6 game suspension. How dare you make a post actually concerning something football related. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
r8drzrule 0 Posted July 7, 2007 vicks not going to be indicted. hes going to get off. you want to know why? people only have ethics and principles up to the point where it effects their pocket books. he paid somebody/everbody off. i don't know if goodell will even suspend him. way of the world, as sickening as it sounds. i vote for a return to street justice like the old west, but thats just me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 988 Posted July 7, 2007 vicks not going to be indicted. hes going to get off. you want to know why? he paid somebody/everbody off. And the moon landing was staged in a Hollywood movie studio... JFK was shot by a 2nd gunmen in the grassy knoll... The smaller WTC building was brought down by an explosive device at the base of the building...and the Pentagon was penetrated by a missile, not a plane... Tony Soprano (nevermind, still not sure about this one)... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
famousb 11 Posted July 7, 2007 And the moon landing was staged in a Hollywood movie studio... JFK was shot by a 2nd gunmen in the grassy knoll... The smaller WTC building was brought down by an explosive device at the base of the building...and the Pentagon was penetrated by a missile, not a plane... Tony Soprano (nevermind, still not sure about this one)... actually i firmly belive #2... that whole magic bullet thing still can't be explained.... #1, well, you could probably convince me on that one still... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted July 7, 2007 And the moon landing was staged in a Hollywood movie studio... JFK was shot by a 2nd gunmen in the grassy knoll... The smaller WTC building was brought down by an explosive device at the base of the building...and the Pentagon was penetrated by a missile, not a plane... Tony Soprano (nevermind, still not sure about this one)... We've landed on the moon?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fozzy4 0 Posted July 7, 2007 And the moon landing was staged in a Hollywood movie studio... JFK was shot by a 2nd gunmen in the grassy knoll... The smaller WTC building was brought down by an explosive device at the base of the building...and the Pentagon was penetrated by a missile, not a plane... Tony Soprano (nevermind, still not sure about this one)... ...and the larger WTC buildings were destroyed by demolitions explosives. Go watch the film footage on wikipedia in the 9/11 conspiracy theory article. You can see blasts happening below the line where the rubble is falling, and they are a known feature of planned demolitions. There is also the intuitive evidence that buildings do not fall straight down when hit by airplanes - they should topple over, being weakened primarily on the impact side. That the buildings fell straight down and destroyed virtually no other buildings at all in the process strongly indicates a planned demolition. Also, it is a known fact that jet fuel (nor anything else in the WTC buildings) cannot burn hot enough to melt the high-grade steel the building structure was made of, contrary to what the US government claims. There is no way that planes hitting them brought those buildings down. If you want further evidence of the scam, I cite the fact that the government claims to have retrieved ID from one of the terrorists at the site. All important evidence, bodies, black boxes, etc are apparently burned beyond recognition, and jet fuel purportedly burned hot enough to melt high-grade steel, yet I am supposed to believe that a paper (or maybe plastic? I don't recall) ID somehow survived the inferno that so conveniently consumed absolutely everything else? No friggin way. Either other things survived, or the passport couldn't, but there's not a chance that what we've been told can actually be true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted July 7, 2007 ...and the larger WTC buildings were destroyed by demolitions explosives. Go watch the film footage on wikipedia in the 9/11 conspiracy theory article. You can see blasts happening below the line where the rubble is falling, and they are a known feature of planned demolitions. There is also the intuitive evidence that buildings do not fall straight down when hit by airplanes - they should topple over, being weakened primarily on the impact side. That the buildings fell straight down and destroyed virtually no other buildings at all in the process strongly indicates a planned demolition. Also, it is a known fact that jet fuel (nor anything else in the WTC buildings) cannot burn hot enough to melt the high-grade steel the building structure was made of, contrary to what the US government claims. There is no way that planes hitting them brought those buildings down. If you want further evidence of the scam, I cite the fact that the government claims to have retrieved ID from one of the terrorists at the site. All important evidence, bodies, black boxes, etc are apparently burned beyond recognition, and jet fuel purportedly burned hot enough to melt high-grade steel, yet I am supposed to believe that a paper (or maybe plastic? I don't recall) ID somehow survived the inferno that so conveniently consumed absolutely everything else? No friggin way. Either other things survived, or the passport couldn't, but there's not a chance that what we've been told can actually be true. But did you know we've landed on the moon?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pronghorn3 0 Posted July 7, 2007 ...and the larger WTC buildings were destroyed by demolitions explosives. Go watch the film footage on wikipedia in the 9/11 conspiracy theory article. You can see blasts happening below the line where the rubble is falling, and they are a known feature of planned demolitions. There is also the intuitive evidence that buildings do not fall straight down when hit by airplanes - they should topple over, being weakened primarily on the impact side. That the buildings fell straight down and destroyed virtually no other buildings at all in the process strongly indicates a planned demolition. Also, it is a known fact that jet fuel (nor anything else in the WTC buildings) cannot burn hot enough to melt the high-grade steel the building structure was made of, contrary to what the US government claims. There is no way that planes hitting them brought those buildings down. If you want further evidence of the scam, I cite the fact that the government claims to have retrieved ID from one of the terrorists at the site. All important evidence, bodies, black boxes, etc are apparently burned beyond recognition, and jet fuel purportedly burned hot enough to melt high-grade steel, yet I am supposed to believe that a paper (or maybe plastic? I don't recall) ID somehow survived the inferno that so conveniently consumed absolutely everything else? No friggin way. Either other things survived, or the passport couldn't, but there's not a chance that what we've been told can actually be true. I looked in wikipedia under @sshole and it mentioned you. Get real you bird brain idiot. You deserve a lashing for this trash. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captian America 0 Posted July 7, 2007 And the moon landing was staged in a Hollywood movie studio... JFK was shot by a 2nd gunmen in the grassy knoll... The smaller WTC building was brought down by an explosive device at the base of the building...and the Pentagon was penetrated by a missile, not a plane... Tony Soprano (nevermind, still not sure about this one)... Not bad! you got a lot of them right. The moon landing may have been staged in Nevada. The gunman behind the picket fence was a french assassin named Jean Soutre. Tower 7 a block away went down around 5:30 on 9-11 yet it was not struck by anything and towers 5 and 6 between both towers 1 & 2 and tower 7 were damage but did not go down. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites