montana 89 Posted August 19, 2011 Philly D or Pitts. O-line. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RSersen 0 Posted August 19, 2011 If the Eagles get run on like that all season, I don't think anyone's going to give a fock who they have at CB. And the thread predicting 26 picks for Vick might not be that off-base. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PATSSOX 22 Posted August 19, 2011 3 for 8 for 24 yards with 2 INTS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,889 Posted August 19, 2011 Vick looks terrible. Glad the game doesn't count. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted August 19, 2011 Vick looks terrible. Glad the game doesn't count. He's a decent tackler. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,889 Posted August 19, 2011 He's a decent tackler. That was a pretty awesome hit. They should try him at LB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted August 19, 2011 Philly D or Pitts. O-line. what part of the Steelers o-line are you disappointed with? The part that ground out two 14 play TD drives against the bestest paper champions in the history of ever? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,626 Posted August 19, 2011 what part of the Steelers o-line are you disappointed with? The part that ground out two 14 play TD drives against the bestest paper champions in the history of ever? Pitts offensive line looks pretty good to me, it looks like they might only be the 10th worst this season. Which is a vast improvement over the worst offensive line last year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted August 19, 2011 Pitts offensive line looks pretty good to me, it looks like they might only be the 10th worst this season. Which is a vast improvement over the worst offensive line last year. they're not that bad and you know it. with starters in and out, they gave Ben good time, opened some good holes pasted the Eagles for 200+ yrds of offense before most of them sat. the only thing that worries me about this team is age+depth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted August 19, 2011 Pre-season doesn't mean sh!t. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rocco91 0 Posted August 19, 2011 Pre-season doesn't mean sh!t. I dont agree especially when its 1st team vs 1st team like it was tonight and PHIL got WHOOPED!!!! This is what I saw tonight: Vick looked terrible vs one of the best DEF( good thing he wont play a D this good every week, he will be fine) Big Ben looks like he could be a steal at his ADP Mendy will be a stud and might get some more catches this year (did you see that one hand catch) Hines Ward still gets looks from Big Ben Tom Brady is good(understatement of the year right) Brady likes his TE in RZ(another understatement) BJGE is going to get the goaline carries(bumps him up IMO) Welker might be back to 2009 form(but I dont want any NE wr or TE- too many options but I'll take Brady as #2 QB behind Rodgers) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
