Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
posty

Obama singles out private citizens for donating to Romney and "betting against America"...

Recommended Posts

Do you know how Harding it is to get a candidate's name on the ballot if he doesn't have a pulse? Only Mel Carnahan could pull off that trick (and still go on to win).

Jeff Johnson...The name you can trust :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know how Harding it is to get a candidate's name on the ballot if he doesn't have a pulse? Only Mel Carnahan could pull off that trick (and still go on to win).

 

Seems like Romney and Al Gore have successfully done it, to name two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you agree with this, you are a fawking dooshbag. This is why most Americans have an unfavorable view of Washington. Nixon is jerking off in his grave.:(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you agree with this, you are a fawking dooshbag. This is why most Americans have an unfavorable view of Washington. Nixon is jerking off in his grave.:(

 

Nobody agrees with this, numbnuts. We think the premise of this OPINION piece is total bullsh!t.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody agrees with this, numbnuts. We think the premise of this OPINION piece is total bullsh!t.

 

 

:cheers: So we agree that any POTUS who singles out his opposistion in this manner is a huge POS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:cheers: So we agree that any POTUS who singles out his opposistion in this manner is a huge POS?

 

I agree that IF Obama even considered using the FBI or SEC to go after Romney's donors, then he is a POS.

 

As for calling them out online, I don't like it but politics is a dirty game. If you're gonna try to buy the results you want in a national election, you have to be willing to deal with public fallout.

 

Look at George Soros. You guys love hating on him for his political contributions abd activities, but he has evidently decided that it's worth the price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that IF Obama even considered using the FBI or SEC to go after Romney's donors, then he is a POS.

 

As for calling them out online, I don't like it but politics is a dirty game. If you're gonna try to buy the results you want in a national election, you have to be willing to deal with public fallout.

 

Look at George Soros. You guys love hating on him for his political contributions abd activities, but he has evidently decided that it's worth the price.

 

 

If you can get on board with this sort of politics, than you're up for any. Don't EVER complain about loose politics if you sgree with this sh!t! This is way out of line. And it doesn't stop here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can get on board with this sort of politics, than you're up for any. Don't EVER complain about loose politics if you sgree with this sh!t! This is way out of line. And it doesn't stop here.

 

I'll go farther.

 

If he even CONSIDERED using his police powers to hassle donors, he should be impeached and go to jail.

 

As for his comments and online stuff, if it's true, it is scummy as hell.

 

Not surprising. Anyone who makes it to the top of the sh!theap that is politics is by definition scum, or he'd have been eaten long ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll go farther.

 

If he even CONSIDERED using his police powers to hassle donors, he should be impeached and go to jail.

As for his comments and online stuff, if it's true, it is scummy as hell.

 

Not surprising. Anyone who makes it to the top of the sh!theap that is politics is by definition scum, or he'd have been eaten long ago.

 

That part is unquestionably true. jerryskids linked to the official site earlier in this thread.

 

The other stuff is completely unsubstantiated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll go farther.

 

If he even CONSIDERED using his police powers to hassle donors, he should be impeached and go to jail.

 

As for his comments and online stuff, if it's true, it is scummy as hell.

 

Not surprising. Anyone who makes it to the top of the sh!theap that is politics is by definition scum, or he'd have been eaten long ago.

 

 

:cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That part is unquestionably true. jerryskids linked to the official site earlier in this thread.

 

The other stuff is completely unsubstantiated.

 

One of the Obama campaign's co chairmen illegally obtained the tax returns for an organization and published one of it's donors on his organization's website. It has been proven that the document was leaked directly from the IRS, and the IRS doesn't dispute this.

 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/28/DOJ-asked-to-Investigate-How-Obama-Campaign

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the Obama campaign's co chairmen illegally obtained the tax returns for an organization and published one of it's donors on his organization's website. It has been proven that the document was leaked directly from the IRS, and the IRS doesn't dispute this.

 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/28/DOJ-asked-to-Investigate-How-Obama-Campaign

 

You'll have to forgive me if I take anything on Breitbart with a huge dose of salt. Has any mainstream news source report on this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll have to forgive me if I take anything on Breitbart with a huge dose of salt. Has any mainstream news source report on this?

 

The story has a bunch of links in it. Did you click any of them? As usual, attack the source and not the substance. But here you go Jethro:

 

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=national+organization+for+marriage&oq=national&aq=2&aqi=d1g10d1&aql=&gs_nf=1&gs_l=news-cc.3.2.43j0l10j43i400.1159.8698.0.11322.33.28.3.7.2.3.214.1696.5j10j1.18.0.#hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=national+organization+for+marriage+irs&oq=national+organization+for+marriage+irs&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=serp.3...5560.6311.0.6469.4.4.0.0.0.0.603.1191.2-1j1j0j1.3.0...0.0.WdYNd55NnwA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=3cdb24598c494ce6&biw=1920&bih=925

 

 

Anyways, assuming it's true would that be an abuse of power?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So we have some allegations from NOM which haven't been proven but have been widely reported by certain right-leaning sources. (BTW, I am not attacking the source, I am simply pointing out that they have an agenda. Would you completely trust something I posted from the likes of MoveOn.org and thinkprogress?)

 

On the other hand, we have sources suggesting that NOM is manufacturing this story to distract people from a worse story about them: http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/nom_demands_to_know_who_crossed_them/singleton/

 

Basically who knows what is true at this point. If it does turn out that the IRS gave these confidential tax documents over, and that Obama himself was involved, then certainly I'd agree that he should be held accountable at the ballot box or even impeached.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So we have some allegations from NOM which haven't been proven but have been widely reported by certain right-leaning sources. (BTW, I am not attacking the source, I am simply pointing out that they have an agenda. Would you completely trust something I posted from the likes of MoveOn.org and thinkprogress?)

 

On the other hand, we have sources suggesting that NOM is manufacturing this story to distract people from a worse story about them: http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/nom_demands_to_know_who_crossed_them/singleton/

 

Basically who knows what is true at this point. If it does turn out that the IRS gave these confidential tax documents over, and that Obama himself was involved, then certainly I'd agree that he should be held accountable at the ballot box or even impeached.

 

Really? Did you look at the tax documents? They're still posted at the Huffington post link that Breitbart posted, or they were as of a couple of days ago when I first read this story. They are clearly IRS internal docs. And HRC is the first place they were posted. And HRC removed them once NOM pointed out they were illegally obtained. Use a little common sense for once. Salon doesn't dispute where they came from. They use the term Whistleblower but I don't think it's appropriate to term someone a whistleblower if they work for the government and illegally leak confidential documents about organizations. This is EXACTLY the type of intimidation tactics this thread is talking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×