bgard72 10 Posted June 3, 2014 http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/bucs/bucs-tedford-plans-to-alternate-running-backs/2182686 Looks like a split between Martin, Mike James and Bobby Rainey. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,652 Posted June 4, 2014 Thats not good news for martin owners. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
snatchit 108 Posted June 4, 2014 Guys I am famous on here for being wrong at times but...... I truly believe most teams will be RBBC this coming year and going forward. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
snatchit 108 Posted June 4, 2014 mix in all the injurys... I think I am going to roll the dice on a bunch of mid round RB's again and hope 2 pop, if I am not top 4 or 5 in the drafting order Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BobSanders_33 127 Posted June 4, 2014 As I said in another thread I'm not down on Doug Martin as much as some because of talent. I am down on him because of coaching and scheme. Lovie Smith didn't maximize the talent of Forte and Tedford has had some very talented backs like Vereen and Best and didn't get max value out of them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ffgiant 10 Posted June 4, 2014 http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/bucs/bucs-tedford-plans-to-alternate-running-backs/2182686 Looks like a split between Martin, Mike James and Bobby Rainey. Interesting. I thought it was just coach talk. Martin is more talented than the rest of RBs on the team. I still expect him to get 2/3 of all the carries, a safer RB2 pick? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,536 Posted June 4, 2014 Worth watching, many things will happen between now and week 1. Martin's stock drops a bit, likely rewarding those snatching him up during the fall. Also worth a stab at the others later, just in case. It's a gamble, if you feel good about your roster, maybe youtake that gamble. Unfortunately, with the unknowns taking Martin (for now) can ruin things if RBBC does arise. You need to strike well in rounds 1-3, then you win the league in rounds 4- 7. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,500 Posted June 5, 2014 Two of the leagues that i'm in are using just a one rb starting postion . One of the leagues is a 12 team league and the other a 10 team league . I like the ideal . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
typhus 13 Posted June 5, 2014 Two of the leagues that i'm in are using just a one rb starting postion . One of the leagues is a 12 team league and the other a 10 team league . I like the ideal . Not for me, I like the thought of making owners change their thought process rather than the commish change the format of the leauge to accomodate those on the short bus. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,500 Posted June 6, 2014 Not for me, I like the thought of making owners change their thought process rather than the commish change the format of the leauge to accomodate those on the short bus. Will i think that's what's being done . When you change the format you make the owners change their thoughts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
death of the cool 0 Posted June 8, 2014 Not for me, I like the thought of making owners change their thought process rather than the commish change the format of the leauge to accomodate those on the short bus. Most of my leagues have changed to 1 RB, 2 WR's, 1 TE, 1 Flex....I was always one of the top teams before the change, but I didn't complain one bit. It actually gives me more flexibility in the draft. I am not chained to taking 2 RB's quickly in the draft, and if you have a RB injury it doesn't screw your season as it had in the past. Teams with 2 great RB's still can dominate (last year I started Charles, Forte 1st , 2nd in my draft)....but it gives you more options. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites