Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mr Neil

Shoot out in Pitt

Recommended Posts

 

 

Vegas lines aren't supposed to be correct. They're supposed to induce betting on both sides equally and that's exactly what they do.

 

Following are the result of every NFL game from the 1983 to 2008 seasons:

  • Over wins: 48.00%
  • Under wins: 49.52%
  • Game ends exactly on total: 2.49%

 

 

I wonder what the variance or devation is aroudn those lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And many times them Vegas lines are wrong , if not many of us would not be here posting .

No

The Vegas lines are where half the money is evenly split on both side

It continues moving until this happens

 

Because of this The over under is very difficult to be

It is a great gauge to whether a game will be high scoring or not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No

The Vegas lines are where half the money is evenly split on both side

It continues moving until this happens

Because of this The over under is very difficult to be

It is a great gauge to whether a game will be high scoring or not

Yeah but you bet one side of the line or the other . So you either win or lose . And just because the under over line is high doesn't always mean that's the way the game will go .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah but you bet one side of the line or the other . So you either win or lose . And just because the under over line is high doesn't always mean that's the way the game will go .

 

 

http://www.boydsbets.com/standard-deviations-of-overunder-margins-by-total/

 

 

The standard deviation and correlation of NFL set totals is frightening. They're right more often than not. And that is almost an understatement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah but you bet one side of the line or the other . So you either win or lose . And just because the under over line is high doesn't always mean that's the way the game will go .

Obviously

But the line on the weekend is where it needed to move to get half the money on the under and half the money on the over (Vegas makes sure of this)

 

IOW, that's what the money (millions $$$$) thinks, not some person or computer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol how did this post get on the topic of betting , im still saying I don't think this game is as high of scoring of a game as most think .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Vegas lines aren't supposed to be correct. They're supposed to induce betting on both sides equally and that's exactly what they do.

 

Following are the result of every NFL game from the 1983 to 2008 seasons:

  • Over wins: 48.00%
  • Under wins: 49.52%
  • Game ends exactly on total: 2.49%

 

 

So you're saying there's a chance......................... YEAAAAH!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to step forward with a call for (A), the 48.00% chance of an OVER in this contest, with the same confidence that Mr. Burger King has been touting his $1.49 nuggets in the debate commercials.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The two lines I'd seen during the week were 49.50 and 50.00 points so, as the final score was 33-20, it was technically a win for the Overs.

 

 

But, in spirit, it was a win for those positioned themselves for the Under and faded Roethlisberger, Dalton or Brown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×