Stock Market bubble - will crash

[Ron_Artest 1,088]

1 minute ago, avoiding injuries said:

So liberals are rooting against the market and economy to try and win political points?

Haven't seen it.  You're wrong as usual.

[thegeneral 2,950]

2 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

So liberals are rooting against the market and economy to try and win political points?

Sounds familiar!

[nobody 2,569]

2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Bill Miller once told CNBC, “I ruled out a return to the Depression, just as I ruled out a return to the Civil War.”  In late 2007, he ignored the warning signs and the well-intentioned alarm from his investors and kept buying Washington Mutual, AIG, Countrywide, Wachovia, and Citigroup and 8% of Freddie Mac.

 

Like I said, same as talking to Google search.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,965]

7 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

So liberals are rooting against the market and economy to try and win political points?

Yes

[Horseman 2,375]

29 minutes ago, easilyscan said:

I gave my analysis of why I liked Crocs stock on page 38. It was trading at $90.72 that day.  Someone thought it was funny.

$111.72

FINY

+10.955 (+10.87%)

 

 

AMZN is up 10% too from it's firesale price.   The weaklings would rather laugh/skyscream and ignore 99.9% of the good advice.   

[Ron_Artest 1,088]

9 minutes ago, nobody said:

Like I said, same as talking to Google search.

That's because it's the result of a google search you idiot.

[Horseman 2,375]

15 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

So liberals are rooting against the market and economy to try and win political points?

Even Tim's alternate reality is a step above some of these losers.  

[nobody 2,569]

3 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

That's because it's the result of a google search you idiot.

Yes I know.  That's the point.  You don't know about this stuff.  Someone you're feuding with says something and you run to Google, and type in "bill Miller bad trades," post it with no reference and act like some sort of expert because you did a 5 minute Google search.  

 

 

[Ron_Artest 1,088]

1 minute ago, nobody said:

Yes I know.  That's the point.  You don't know about this stuff.  Someone says something that you're feuding with and you run to Google, and type in "bill Miller bad trades," post it with no reference and act like some sort of expert because you did a 5 minute Google search.  

 

 

First day at the geek club?  Do you know what the term "link"? means?

[Horseman 2,375]

4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

That's because it's the result of a google search you idiot.

*note - reading comprehension fail. Again.  Good god son, seek help.  

 

[thegeneral 2,950]

6 minutes ago, Horseman said:

AMZN is up 10% too from it's firesale price.   The weaklings would rather laugh/skyscream and ignore 99.9% of the good advice.   

Been buying all the way down personally. Nothing really ground breaking here.

Read the racial, hundreds of trans, covid, shooting threads to get to the 99.9% “take things said here”with a grain of salt stat

[Horseman 2,375]

Next up is the tiny brain semantics game. Book it.  

[nobody 2,569]

2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

First day at the geek club?  Do you know what the term "link"? means?

Did you provide a link?  Did you have the courtesy to not take someone else's work and post it as your own?

The proper way to use someone else's work would be to say, "I don't know much about bill Miller's track record but my google search turned up this link..."

[Horseman 2,375]

Just now, thegeneral said:

Been buying all the way down personally. Nothing really ground breaking here.

Read the racial, hundreds of trans, covid, shooting threads to get to the 99.9% “take things said here”with a grain of salt stat

Hard for you to distinguish I imagine.  

[nobody 2,569]

But the point is the same even if gutter didn't steal other people's work.  Talking to him is no different then going to Google for evidence of the opposite of what your thinking.  The guy has no original thoughts.

[Ron_Artest 1,088]

1 minute ago, nobody said:

Did you provide a link?  Did you have the courtesy to not take someone else's work and post it as your own?

The proper way to use someone else's work would be to say, "I don't know much about bill Miller's track record but my google search turned up this link..."

If someone asked for a link I would have provided it.  You didn't ask but here you go https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-millers-inglorious-demise-your-complete-guide-2011-8

Thanks for the posting tips.

[Ron_Artest 1,088]

1 minute ago, nobody said:

But the point is the same even if gutter didn't steal other people's work.  Talking to him is no different then going to Google for evidence of the opposite of what your thinking.  The guy has no original thoughts.

We've never talked.

[nobody 2,569]

2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

We've never talked.

I'm using the word "talk" as a proxy for communicate.  In this context obviously via posting.  

No need to Google if communication consists of more than talking.  I know it does.  It was an imprecise word choice on my part.

[Horseman 2,375]

2 minutes ago, nobody said:

But the point is the same even if gutter didn't steal other people's work.  Talking to him is no different then going to Google for evidence of the opposite of what your thinking.  The guy has no original thoughts.

Some of us have really tried to help the poor fella.   He doesn't take constructive criticism well.  Really low level communication and comprehension skills. 

[thegeneral 2,950]

3 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Hard for you to distinguish I imagine.  

Not really. Buying good companies that dropped 20% in a week because Captain dipshit invents a problem was a good bet to make. Hopefully this holds true.

Reading political threads on this place is for humor mostly.

[Horseman 2,375]

12 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Next up is the tiny brain semantics game. Book it.  

 

7 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

We've never talked.

Boop bop beep

Quote

Yes, posting online conversations can be considered a form of talking, as it involves exchanging verbal or written communication. The content of the messages, whether they are text-based or recorded audio/video, constitutes a form of dialogue. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,965]

26 minutes ago, nobody said:

Yes I know.  That's the point.  You don't know about this stuff.  Someone you're feuding with says something and you run to Google, and type in "bill Miller bad trades," post it with no reference and act like some sort of expert because you did a 5 minute Google search.  

 

 

Bingo. Anyone drone that can’t think for himself. Place is crawling wit them. 

[Ron_Artest 1,088]

12 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Bingo. Anyone drone that can’t think for himself. Place is crawling wit them. 

The guy who gets all his opinions from Tucker Carlson.

Bonus points for the lack grammar.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,965]

7 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

The guy who gets all his opinions from Tucker Carlson.

Bonus points for the lack grammar.

 Deflect. You’re not as bad as that Saints guy, or squishy, but you think you’re displaying some sort of intellect by pulling some shitt from google that you agree with.  

[thegeneral 2,950]

This Bill Miller who has been the point of discussion in here today (never never heard of him) just talked up Google big time @easilyscan 

Sounded all good to me

Mostly just said they are cheap looking at the numbers and he trusts them as a business when pressed on the issue Apple raised that caused the selloff.

[Ron_Artest 1,088]

7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

 Deflect. You’re not as bad as that Saints guy, or squishy, but you think you’re displaying some sort of intellect by pulling some shitt from google that you agree with.  

So how does it work.  I ask google to say something smart then I copy and paste it here?  Shut up.

Was this a response from google?

[Horseman 2,375]

32 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

So how does it work.  I ask google to say something smart then I copy and paste it here?  Shut up.

Already answered. You just can't read or it just doesn't penetrate.  It's fascinating, science needs to study your brain.   

1 hour ago, nobody said:

Yes I know.  That's the point.  You don't know about this stuff.  Someone you're feuding with says something and you run to Google, and type in "bill Miller bad trades," post it with no reference and act like some sort of expert because you did a 5 minute Google search.  

 

 

[jbycho 610]

3 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

So how does it work.  I ask google to say something smart then I copy and paste it here?  Shut up.

Was this a response from google?

That's weird. I've never seen you post anything smart. 

[Ron_Artest 1,088]

US stocks underperform rest of world by widest margin since 1993

Investors fear Trump’s tariff blitz will lead to US stagflation while weak dollar adds to woes


US stocks have underperformed the rest of the world this year by the widest margin in more than three decades as Donald Trump’s erratic policymaking sparks an investor exodus from American assets.

The MSCI USA index — a broad gauge of US equities — lost 11 per cent in the first 16 weeks of the year. The MSCI all world ex-US benchmark climbed 4 per cent in dollar terms over the same period, the biggest gap with Wall Street since 1993, when US investor enthusiasm for foreign stocks surged on the back of trade liberalisation and concerns over the domestic economy.

https://www.ft.com/content/f3a7d677-bdf1-4a85-8ae3-aaea668d8c07

The dollar is also down 10% this year.

[Horseman 2,375]

3 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

US stocks underperform rest of world by widest margin since 1993

Investors fear Trump’s tariff blitz will lead to US stagflation while weak dollar adds to woes


US stocks have underperformed the rest of the world this year by the widest margin in more than three decades as Donald Trump’s erratic policymaking sparks an investor exodus from American assets.

The MSCI USA index — a broad gauge of US equities — lost 11 per cent in the first 16 weeks of the year. The MSCI all world ex-US benchmark climbed 4 per cent in dollar terms over the same period, the biggest gap with Wall Street since 1993, when US investor enthusiasm for foreign stocks surged on the back of trade liberalisation and concerns over the domestic economy.

https://www.ft.com/content/f3a7d677-bdf1-4a85-8ae3-aaea668d8c07

The dollar is also down 10% this year.

Let me guess: you're not smart enough to be diversified into international. 

[Ron_Artest 1,088]

6 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Let me guess: you're not smart enough to be diversified into international. 

Wrong again dumbass

[Horseman 2,375]

40 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Wrong again dumbass

Then why are you crying?

International is up 12% YTD.  It was down 8% the first week in April.  If you rebalanced twice like I did when I told you, you'd have ~5% more shares all around.   

[jbycho 610]

47 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Let me guess: you're not smart enough to be diversified into international. 

He said he pulled out of the market when it hit it's lowest. 

He's a buy high, sell low kind of guy. 

We basically get rich off of dopes like him. 

[easilyscan 869]

A similar article that isn't hidden behind a pay wall.

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/u-s-vs-international-stock-market-performance/#:~:text=So far in 2025%2C international stocks are outperforming,the S%26P 500 in January in a decade.

 

[Ron_Artest 1,088]

5 hours ago, Horseman said:

Then why are you crying?

International is up 12% YTD.  It was down 8% the first week in April.  If you rebalanced twice like I did when I told you, you'd have ~5% more shares all around.   

Crying?  You have a reading compression problem.

I'm just discussing how money is getting pulled out of the US and invested in other countries.