Jump to content
listen2me 23

***OFFICIAL Green Bay @ Santa Clara Divisional Round Thread***

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Reality said:

I was screaming at the TV, I'm convinced he had 9ers -9.5.

likewise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said:

Aiyuk was kind of a female dog last night: yes and no.  underused,but made some incredible catches.

McCaffrey and Kittle played through some frustrations to still impact the game in a huge way. They kept their heads in the game: yes, aside from the one drop from kittle that would have been and easy first down late

The Linesman consistently spotted Green Bay short. It was conspicuous: one was close. one was not.

Can't drop certain interceptions in a playoff game: absolutely. 49ers could have locked up an NFCC game with a late pick vs the rams

I don't believe Melton controlled that called touchdown in time: at first i didn't either. benefit of replay, i think he got it

Why did Doubs run out of bounds on his first long catch?  He did it five yards short of where the defender was: may have been momentum. i would need to rewatch

I laughed at the terrible flop by the Packer, Owens I think, when Trent Williams brushed him away.  How could the refs call that? bad

I knew to a certainty Carlson would miss that kick.  My only uncertainty was whether he would doink it.

Had the 9ers lost, i would have been pissed at the poor PIs, and equipment manager (very bad slips that led to big plays)

 

Not a great game from Purdy, but solid on that last drive.  I believe they have better matchups with det and TBB

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Purdy is the only non 1st rd qb that was in the divisional round, correct?

I know kc has had to adjust post mahomes rookie contact, and I can't believe the 9ers will continue to be able to have a plethora of best players at their position in the league.   And if they're not the best, they're in the top 5.  I wonder if Purdy will still have the success he is early once the talent around him starts to diminish. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That Melton TD was not a catch. Refs had no interest in reviewing it, they did want a tight game 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

That Melton TD was not a catch. Refs had no interest in reviewing it, they did want a tight game 

i thought he had possession with two feet in (after i saw the replay).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bier Meister said:

i thought he had possession with two feet in (after i saw the replay).

Classic case of a bobble in my eyes. Anyway I just thought it was very odd how they didn’t even stop play to look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

Classic case of a bobble in my eyes. Anyway I just thought it was very odd how they didn’t even stop play to look.

bobbled but got possession.

 

agree with bolded

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bier Meister said:

bobbled but got possession.

 

agree with bolded

I don’t think he had possession with both feet down. IMO possession comes as he’s falling to the ground which in that scenario was out of bounds. I’m not even a Niners fan, was actually probably even rooting for GB as the underdog, but they got a HUGE break there imo 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


 

gets possession with left in. Then drags right

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

That Melton TD was not a catch. Refs had no interest in reviewing it, they did want a tight game 

Your wrong. It was a catch. It was reviewed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

Classic case of a bobble in my eyes. Anyway I just thought it was very odd how they didn’t even stop play to look.

Yeah, you're wrong again.  It was reviewed and determined a catch.

The only thing that was bobbled here was your logic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, you're wrong again.  It was reviewed and determined a catch.

The only thing that was bobbled here was your logic.

In like ten seconds? Ok bud

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×