Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (Testimony Resumes After Gag Order Hearing)

[jonmx 1,606]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

It doesn't back up your claim. Sorry. 

I see you are quadrupling down on being retarded.  It's a bold strategy, squisy. 

[Ron_Artest 690]

15 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

How? That’s not cool. 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,695]

Just now, Ron_Artest said:

 

How did Watters get that info? 

[jonmx 1,606]

31 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

So Fox News is now intimidating jurors?  Unbelievable.

Since MSNBC says so you believe it?   Because some leftist snowflake says she is afraid of pressure from her friends it is somehow FoxNews intimidating jurors.  Your are brainwashed.

[jonmx 1,606]

9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

How did Watters get that info? 

There are reporters in the court room and it is widely reported.  A potential juror repeats leftist talking points and MSNBC wonders why they think she is a leftist.  Gee, I don't know....

[squistion 900]

8 minutes ago, jonmx said:

I see you are quadrupling down on being retarded.  It's a bold strategy, squisy. 

You have yet to back up your claim that SCOTUS has ruled that Trump can have no speech restrictions by the Judge during this trial (I refer everyone to the link I posted above which proves again why you got the wrong_mx nickname at that other place).

[Ron_Artest 690]

7 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Since MSNBC says so you believe it?   Because some leftist snowflake says she is afraid of pressure from her friends it is somehow FoxNews intimidating jurors.  Your are brainwashed.

This is was maga does.  They're thugs.  Authoritarian thugs intimidate people to get their way.  You want this.

[IGotWorms 3,323]

20 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

 

He should be charged

[jonmx 1,606]

13 minutes ago, squistion said:

You have yet to back up your claim that SCOTUS has ruled that Trump can have no speech restrictions by the Judge during this trial (I refer everyone to the link I posted above which proves again why you got the wrong_mx nickname at that other place).

JFC....you are fuking dumb.   

[Hardcore troubadour 12,695]

11 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

He should be charged

For repeating what the court reporters reported? 

[jonmx 1,606]

11 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

He should be charged

Charged with what?  Reporting?  This is a public hearing.  Talking about what happened in court is not illegal.  

[jonmx 1,606]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

For repeating what the court reporters reported? 

MSNBC is upset!  They must get upset too, because they are morons who can't think for themselves.  

[shadrap 117]

22 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

This is was maga does.  They're thugs.  Authoritarian thugs intimidate people to get their way.  You want this.

Again I ask, if Trump was not running for president do you think this lawsuit would have been filed??

[IGotWorms 3,323]

9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

For repeating what the court reporters reported? 

Obstruction of justice, witness intimidation, etc

[squistion 900]

4 minutes ago, shadrap said:

Again I ask, if Trump was not running for president do you think this lawsuit would have been filed??

Of course. Donald J. Trump repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal crimes that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election. Anyone one else who had done that would have been similarly charged. 

[The Real timschochet 2,985]

12 minutes ago, shadrap said:

Again I ask, if Trump was not running for president do you think this lawsuit would have been filed??

What lawsuit? 

[squistion 900]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

What lawsuit? 

He means criminal trial.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,695]

Stephen A Smith went off on this bogus case. Says they can’t beat him fair amd square so they have resorted to lawfare. SAS is a big time democrat. 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,695]

7 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

What lawsuit? 

Hey Tim, do you think Hamas is a terrorist organization? 

[jonmx 1,606]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Stephen A Smith went off on this bonus case. Says they can’t beat him fair amd square so they have resorted to lawfare. SAS is a big time democrat. 

 

A unicorn.  An honest Democrat. 

[squistion 900]

14 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Stephen A Smith went off on this bogus case. Says they can’t beat him fair amd square so they have resorted to lawfare. SAS is a big time democrat. 

If SAS is a big time Democrat, I'm Prince Harry. 

[The Real timschochet 2,985]

3 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Hey Tim, do you think Hamas is a terrorist organization? 

Yes. 

[Tree of Knowledge 842]

Sounds like a lot of light-steppers and ugly angry feminists.  Trump’s best hope is jurist #12 being captivated by his machismo and causing a hung jury. 
 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/rigged-court-heres-full-list-details-nyc-jurors/

[The Real timschochet 2,985]

4 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Trump’s best hope is jurist #12 being captivated by his machismo and causing a hung jury. 
 

 

So you admit that the anyone who hears the facts in this case will vote to convict,, right? 

[Ron_Artest 690]

Sleeping again today 

[BeachGuy23 520]

24 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Sounds like a lot of light-steppers and ugly angry feminists.  Trump’s best hope is jurist #12 being captivated by his machismo and causing a hung jury. 
 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/rigged-court-heres-full-list-details-nyc-jurors/

Trump and machismo...

I just can't...

[The Real timschochet 2,985]

7 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Trump and machismo...

I just can't...

“He doesn’t look as orange as I thought he would…just kind of yellow.” 

[Tree of Knowledge 842]

32 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

So you admit that the anyone who hears the facts in this case will vote to convict,, right? 

Wrong. The woman put in writing that it never happened.   Case closed.  Pure Election Interference.  

[squistion 900]

6 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Wrong. The woman put in writing that it never happened.   Case closed.  Pure Election Interference.  

Dude, it doesn't matter that it didn't happen. That is not what this trial is about. He is not on trial for having sexual relations with her or paying her hush money to keep quiet about it. 

[Tree of Knowledge 842]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

Dude, it doesn't matter that it didn't happen. That is not what this trial is about. He is not on trial for having sexual relations with her or paying her hush money to keep quiet about it. 

So the trial is basically to keep Trump tied up in court.  At least you are being honest. 

[jonmx 1,606]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

So you admit that the anyone who hears the facts in this case will vote to convict,, right? 

There is no crime to convict him of.  The prosecutor created a crime and thr judge is going along with it.  This case is a judicial lynching.

[jonmx 1,606]

26 minutes ago, squistion said:

Dude, it doesn't matter that it didn't happen. That is not what this trial is about. He is not on trial for having sexual relations with her or paying her hush money to keep quiet about it. 

Explain what he is on trail for and all the underlying elements required.  

[Hardcore troubadour 12,695]

My concern now that the left wing media have pretty much identified these people is that they fear left wing violent activists come looking for them. The left has a whole lot of unhinged actors prone to violence.  

[Tree of Knowledge 842]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

My concern now that the left wing media have pretty much identified these people is that they fear left wing violent activists come looking for them. The left has a whole lot of unhinged actors prone to violence.  

All it takes is one missed pronoun.  

[squistion 900]

Just now, jonmx said:

Explain what he is on trail for and all the underlying elements required.  

First-degree falsifying business records (34 counts). 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecution_of_Donald_Trump_in_New_York

The indictment charged Trump with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records^{[clarification needed]} in the first degree, in violation of New York Penal Law §175.10. Each count is related to a specific business document, each having a date ranging from February 14 through December 5, 2017:^[7]

• 11 for invoices from Michael Cohen
• 9 for general ledger entries for Donald J. Trump
• 3 for general ledger entries for the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust
• 8 for checks from Donald J. Trump
• 2 for checks from the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust

The allegedly falsified documents are related to Trump's payment to Stormy Daniels as hush money. The payments were listed in the business records as a legal expense payable to Michael Cohen, whereas the indictment alleges that they were actually to reimburse Cohen for the earlier, allegedly illicit, payment to Daniels.^[91][92]

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a felony under New York state law that requires that the "intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof". This is in contrast to falsifying business records in the second degree, which is a misdemeanor that does not have that requirement.^[7][91][92] In later filings, Bragg listed three such crimes that Trump allegedly intended to commit: violation of federal campaign finance limits, violation of state election laws by unlawfully influencing the 2016 election, and violation of state tax laws regarding the reimbursement.^[93] Trump can move to allow the jury the option to convict on the misdemeanor charges as a lesser included offense, but is not required to do so.^[94]

[Ron_Artest 690]

8 minutes ago, jonmx said:

There is no crime to convict him of.  The prosecutor created a crime and thr judge is going along with it.  This case is a judicial lynching.

Falsifying business records wasn't a crime before the prosecutor created it?

[Ron_Artest 690]

7 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Explain what he is on trail for and all the underlying elements required.  

Oregon.  Let's hope he doesn't come down with dysentery.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,695]

1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

Falsifying business records wasn't a crime before the prosecutor created it?

If they were falsified, you think Trump was the one that did it, or ordered it? Maybe. Problem is the only one claiming that has been convicted of perjury and done prison time already.  

[Ron_Artest 690]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

If they were falsified, you think Trump was the one that did it, or ordered it? Maybe. Problem is the only one claiming that has been convicted of perjury and done prison time already.  

We'll see.  That's why we have a trial.

[squistion 900]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

If they were falsified, you think Trump was the one that did it, or ordered it? Maybe. Problem is the only one claiming that has been convicted of perjury and done prison time already.  

Well, yeah since he reimbursed Michael Cohen for the hush money payments (which he wouldnt logically do if he hadn't ordered it).