Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
squistion

Trump's NY Election Interference Trial - Trump is found guilty on all 34 counts

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Motive to what?  Not have it be known that he banged a porn Star?  Is that felony worthy? 
 

Why would Donald lie about it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, avoiding injuries said:

You never focked someone and didn’t want anyone to know about it?

Yeah that would be something that could be damaging to a say a politician running for office, no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Yeah that would be something that could be damaging to a say a politician running for office, no?

Yeah.  Now that it's out he'll never get elected to a third term!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Strike said:

Yeah.  Now that it's out he'll never get elected to a third term!!

Well he still says he never did anything with Stormy 😂

This was the crux of that case though. Not that he obviously raw dogged the skank just after his mail order wife gave birth, but that he wanted to cover it up with payments that he falsified. He would do this so the stick up the asss conservatives could vote for him in 2016. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Well he still says he never did anything with Stormy 😂

This was the crux of that case though. Not that he obviously raw dogged the skank just after his mail order wife gave birth, but that he wanted to cover it up with payments that he falsified. He would do this so the stick up the asss conservatives could vote for him in 2016. 

This is the case Biden's justice dept. refused to prosecute.  Am I remembering this correctly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Strike said:

This is the case Biden's justice dept. refused to prosecute.  Am I remembering this correctly?

Don’t know. These are the details of the NY case and my understanding of why the jury found Dementia Don guilty. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Don’t know. These are the details of the NY case and my understanding of why the jury found Dementia Don guilty. 

They would have found him guilty of ANYTHING before them.  That's what you libs don't get.  The facts don't matter.  Whether the case was valid doesn't matter.  They were going to get him and they think they did.  It should concern you the lengths they went to to get him but it doesn't, and that's just sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Strike said:

They would have found him guilty of ANYTHING before them.  That's what you libs don't get.  The facts don't matter.  Whether the case was valid doesn't matter.  They were going to get him and they think they did.  It should concern you the lengths they went to to get him but it doesn't, and that's just sad.

There is the small matter that he did all this.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×