Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
jbycho

Trump should have the option to serve 2 more terms as president if he wants it.

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Sooo… the repeated cognitive tests, the MRIs, the crooked walks, the gibberish about 1200% reduction in health costs, the public DM to his AG, being pushed around by his counterparts is…. a choice.

Biden refused cognitive tests. Many many many normal people get MRIs. 

Democrats took their ball and cried and went home. That:s not pushing anyone around. That's going into hiding and crying alone. 

And none of YOUR gibberish proves anything. Are you having mental issues? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, seafoam1 said:

Biden refused cognitive tests. Many many many normal people get MRIs. 

Democrats took their ball and cried and went home. That:s not pushing anyone around. That's going into hiding and crying alone. 

And none of YOUR gibberish proves anything. 

What people with no known orthopedic injury get MRIs and also get requested to do cognitive tests? I’m not being snarky I’m genuinely curious, what diagnosis does it signify?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

What people with no known orthopedic injury get MRIs and also get requested to do cognitive tests? I’m not being snarky I’m genuinely curious, what diagnosis does it signify?

The liberals requesting cognitive tests are just trolling. Trump said he would abide. Biden said he wouldn't.

I do a lot of preventative care in life. Get my heart checked, got a colonoscopy, have a tight Achilles tendon, will probably get that looked at, go to the dentist regularly, evaluate my mental health here and there, use some lotion when my hands get dry,.

I get all things checked out prior to bad stuff actually occuring. You should try it. :thumbsup:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

The liberals requesting cognitive tests are just trolling. Trump said he would abide. Biden said he wouldn't.

I do a lot of preventative care in life. Get my heart checked, got a colonoscopy, have a tight Achilles tendon, will probably get that looked at, go to the dentist regularly, evaluate my mental health here and there, use some lotion when my hands get dry,.

I get all things checked out prior to bad stuff actually occuring. You should try it. :thumbsup:

Uhm, but no MRIs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost one year later and this is still one of the stupidest threads here...

And a lot was started by MO and seafoam since then...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, posty said:

Almost one year later and this is still one of the stupidest threads here...

And a lot was started by MO and seafoam since then...

Poor pusty's life is this site. Sad. RIP. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

The thing where Grassley rotely reads off of index cards presented by his staffers is pretty bad. McConnell freezing. Pelosi breaking her hip in a fall. There’s a lot finger pointing and maybe everyone ought to take a moment & think about reforms about limiting ages of officials, pardons, campaign finance & profiting from office. We just keep throwing rocks at each other. 

Again, pointing out the age of these people and any possible deficiencies is a legitimate topic- but I think one the voters should decide. If someone from Kentucky  says to you “I’m well aware how old Mitch McConnell is and how he sometimes isn’t all there, but I like his politics and I trust him and I want him to remain as my senator” why should you or I have the power to say no? 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/8/2024 at 12:41 PM, jbycho said:

He was forced to beat 2 presidential candidates put out there by the Democrats. Both the sitting president and then the sitting vice president. 

Sure there was only 1 actual election, but the liberals put one guy up there and Trump has to deal with that one, THEN, "Oh wait, psych!! We were just kidding. Now spend your time focusing on this other one. Let's see how you do with that." 

Well Donald’s 1st term was stolen from him and then the reelection was hijacked so it makes sense to allow him 1 more term

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Uhm, but no MRIs?

I'm not president of the US. I don't have a world class medical staff doting over me 24x7 and being 100% cautious of every possible thing in the world that could happen.   And I'm perfectly fine. 

How do you know that you are perfectly fine? You don't. 

What is it you are looking for here because all you are doing is fear mongering by creating massive speculation for the TDS driven dopes out there to whine about .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

It’s two years so that the House is more devoted to pleasing the public whereas Senators are allowed to make their own decisions. I think the Founding Fathers were wise to do it that way. 
 

But I strongly disagree with your other point. If the good people of Iowa want to keep electing Charles Grassley every 6 years why shouldn’t they be allowed to do so? Just because he’s old as fock and I don’t like his politics, too bad, that should be their right to decide. 

then by that thought why shouldnt the people be allowed to elect a president continually?

I would say either term limits on everyone or on nobody

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Again, pointing out the age of these people and any possible deficiencies is a legitimate topic- but I think one the voters should decide. If someone from Kentucky  says to you “I’m well aware how old Mitch McConnell is and how he sometimes isn’t all there, but I like his politics and I trust him and I want him to remain as my senator” why should you or I have the power to say no? 

Well we have lower age limitations on the presidency & we have state level term limitations. I know some states also have age limits on judges. And there are some extreme examples, like Thurmond who was past 100 & Feinstein.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

then by that thought why shouldnt the people be allowed to elect a president continually?

I would say either term limits on everyone or on nobody

 

Well that was my point. My answer to your question is yes. Term limits on nobody. 
 

But I want them on Supreme Court justices because that is an appointed position not an elected one. I don’t think any appointments should be for life. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Well we have lower age limitations on the presidency & we have state level term limitations. I know some states also have age limits on judges. And there are some extreme examples, like Thurmond who was past 100 & Feinstein.

I know. I am personally opposed to these restrictions. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×