Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
squistion

U.S. Military Kills Another 6 People in 5th Caribbean Strike, Trump Says

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Strike said:

This may be one of the dumbest things you've ever said, and that's saying a lot.

You never explained how the evidence used to justify the attack was actually blown up in the attack.  That is one of the dumbest things ever posted on this board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Please explain how it’s possible they had evidence before blowing up the boat but don’t have it now.

Evidence comes in many forms.  They had intelligence.  If the intelligence is high confidence they act on it.  Just like when  they blow up terrorists.  They don't take their picture first and ask TimHauck and GutterAlias if they're ok with blowing up the person in the picture.  HTH 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

You never explained how the evidence used to justify the attack was actually blown up in the attack.  That is one of the dumbest things ever posted on this board.

10 times banned alias says what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Strike said:

Evidence comes in many forms.  They had intelligence.  If the intelligence is high confidence they act on it.  Just like when  they blow up terrorists.  They don't take their picture first and ask TimHauck and GutterAlias if they're ok with blowing up the person in the picture.  HTH 

Thanks for confirming we didn’t blow up the evidence then.  If we had enough intelligence to blow up the boat, we shouldn’t allow these survivors to simply go free.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Thanks for confirming we didn’t blow up the evidence then.  If we had enough intelligence to blow up the boat, we shouldn’t allow these survivors to simply go free.

Exactly.  They should be tried for their crimes against America.

Unless of course we don't have that intelligence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Thanks for confirming we didn’t blow up the evidence then.  If we had enough intelligence to blow up the boat, we shouldn’t allow these survivors to simply go free.

Well that was a facetious lighthearted post because we blew up the boat.  I'm sure we blew up SOME evidence.  That doesn't mean we don't have intelligence that dictated our action of blowing up the boat in the first place.  But I get it.  You always look for some semantic argument for a "gotcha.".  It's tiring and getting old though.  Grow a sense of humor along with some critical thinking skills.  You'd find life a lot more enjoyable if you did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have enough evidence to militarily attack a ship you have enough evidence:

- to interrogate.

- to detain.

- to interdict the ship in international waters or those of a foreign nation.

- to interdict in domestic waters.

- to seize property.

- to charge criminally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Strike said:

Well that was a facetious lighthearted post because we blew up the boat.  I'm sure we blew up SOME evidence.  That doesn't mean we don't have intelligence that dictated our action of blowing up the boat in the first place.  But I get it.  You always look for some semantic argument for a "gotcha.".  It's tiring and getting old though.  Grow a sense of humor along with some critical thinking skills.  You'd find life a lot more enjoyable if you did.

You suck at humor if that was supposed to be a joke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Strike said:

Evidence comes in many forms.  They had intelligence.  If the intelligence is high confidence they act on it.  Just like when  they blow up terrorists.  They don't take their picture first and ask TimHauck and GutterAlias if they're ok with blowing up the person in the picture.  HTH 

I don’t think they need to ask @TimHauck for permission. However they ARE supposed to consult with Congress, specifically with John Thune, Chuck Schumer, Mike Johnson, and Hakan Jeffries. They’re supposed to meet with these 4 in a closed room and present their evidence prior to any use of our military. This is the way it’s always been done throughout our history. There is not a single President who did not do this until now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×