Comey to be Indicted

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

Former DOJ officials say Comey case is vindictive, call for dismissal

“More than 100 former Justice Department officials urged a federal judge in Virginia on Monday to dismiss charges against former FBI director James B. Comey, arguing that the prosecution was fueled by political animus and not guided by legal standards.”

[Maximum Overkill 2,409]

3 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

More than 100 former Justice Department officials urged a federal judge in Virginia on Monday to dismiss charges against former FBI director James B. Comey, arguing that the prosecution was fueled by political animus and not guided by legal standards.”

Didn't Comey already lie to Congress? What's to dispute? 

[seafoam1 3,403]

3 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Didn't Comey already lie to Congress? What's to dispute? 

Liberals lying to Congress and in courts doesn't matter because Trump caught the flu years ago. 

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

37 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Didn't Comey already lie to Congress? What's to dispute? 

Well for one thing *if that were true it happened 8 years ago, way past the statute of limitations. The list of reasons continues for a while after that. He just filed a 51 page brief himself.

[TBayXXXVII 2,659]

15 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Well for one thing *if that were true it happened 8 years ago, way past the statute of limitations. The list of reasons continues for a while after that. He just filed a 51 page brief himself.

NYC has paved the way to change this to fit one's needs, have they not?  Or is that only ok when Democrats do it?

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

16 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

NYC has paved the way to change this to fit one's needs, have they not?  Or is that only ok when Democrats do it?

Are you talking about the hush money payments? Those were made during the campaign, through the transition & into Trump’s 1st presidency. Those were charged within the SOL.

[seafoam1 3,403]

42 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Well for one thing *if that were true it happened 8 years ago, way past the statute of limitations. The list of reasons continues for a while after that. He just filed a 51 page brief himself.

The statute of limitations makes comey a good guy.  

[shadrap 253]

4 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Former DOJ officials say Comey case is vindictive, call for dismissal

“More than 100 former Justice Department officials urged a federal judge in Virginia on Monday to dismiss charges against former FBI director James B. Comey, arguing that the prosecution was fueled by political animus and not guided by legal standards.”

More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

 

 

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

31 minutes ago, shadrap said:

More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

Yes, I know. Trump & Ed Martin have threatened them too. Crowning yallselves with glory.

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

42 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

The statute of limitations makes comey a good guy.  

No, it just makes him unconvictable.

[seafoam1 3,403]

44 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

No, it just makes him unconvictable.

So he's off limits for life no matter what else he does? 

[shadrap 253]

5 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Former DOJ officials say Comey case is vindictive, call for dismissal

“More than 100 former Justice Department officials urged a federal judge in Virginia on Monday to dismiss charges against former FBI director James B. Comey, arguing that the prosecution was fueled by political animus and not guided by legal standards.”

More than 1000 residents of the Villages in FL familiar with the law say the charges are justified 

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

8 minutes ago, shadrap said:

More than 1000 residents of the Villages in FL familiar with the law say the charges are justified 

They should file their brief & tell the judge.

[MDC 7,843]

What’s there to argue about? Everyone including Trump knows nothing is going to happen to Comey. Using the courts to harass people is something rich dirtbags do.

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

1 hour ago, seafoam1 said:

So he's off limits for life no matter what else he does? 

I might be wrong I think maybe the Crossfire Hurricane stuff is still fair game? Not sure. But it’s funny they didn’t charge him with any of that or lying about it. This is all about a leak about the Hillary emails investigation that helped Trump IIRC. - In the long long time ago Comey was a Republican appointee who IIIRC angered Dems because he got involved with some scandal involving AG John Ashcroft (torture?). Then he made Dems & Republicans both mad because he didn’t do exactly what they wanted with Hillary emails. Then he pissed Trump off because he investigated the DNC hack (which had to be investigated). Comey’s in his third cycle of controversy.

[seafoam1 3,403]

8 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I might be wrong I think maybe the Crossfire Hurricane stuff is still fair game? Not sure. But it’s funny they didn’t charge him with any of that or lying about it. This is all about a leak about the Hillary emails investigation that helped Trump IIRC. - In the long long time ago Comey was a Republican appointee who IIIRC angered Dems because he got involved with some scandal involving AG John Ashcroft (torture?). Then he made Dems & Republicans both mad because he didn’t do exactly what they wanted with Hillary emails. Then he pissed Trump off because he investigated the DNC hack (which had to be investigated). Comey’s in his third cycle of controversy.

I don't care who put him in place, as he's proven he is the type of guy who can be bought for the right price. But a bad guy is a bad guy no matter what fox or cnn says about the situation. 

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

1 hour ago, seafoam1 said:

I don't care who put him in place, as he's proven he is the type of guy who can be bought for the right price. But a bad guy is a bad guy no matter what fox or cnn says about the situation. 

The FBI & intelligence community protect America from terrorists, spies, corruption, fraud, international crime, & drug & sex trafficking. IIRC he was decorated before he ever became FBID. Really IMO Trump, Bondi & Patel don’t have an ounce of the public service he’s made in his lifetime. But it doesn’t matter,  good/bad, no one is above the law but also no one is beneath its protections.

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

Looks like the The Judge is moving pretty quickly.

[seafoam1 3,403]

1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

The FBI & intelligence community protect America from terrorists, spies, corruption, fraud, international crime, & drug & sex trafficking. IIRC he was decorated before he ever became FBID. Really IMO Trump, Bondi & Patel don’t have an ounce of the public service he’s made in his lifetime. But it doesn’t matter,  good/bad, no one is above the law but also no one is beneath its protections.

Good guys go bad some times. If you refuse to admit that, then there is no reason for further comment. 

Gun for hire in the FBI.... maybe he has debts he needs to pay. Wouldn't be the first time people fock up. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,659]

20 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Are you talking about the hush money payments? Those were made during the campaign, through the transition & into Trump’s 1st presidency. Those were charged within the SOL.

No, talking about changing the statute of limitations of sexual abuse from 5(?), years to something like 30 years, so that they can run their kangaroo court proceedings for Carroll in the effort to sway voters before the elections.  I don't recall ANY Democrat having a problem with that.

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

3 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

No, talking about changing the statute of limitations of sexual abuse from 5(?), years to something like 30 years, so that they can run their kangaroo court proceedings for Carroll in the effort to sway voters before the elections.  I don't recall ANY Democrat having a problem with that.

I don’t think NY was the only place to do that. Different states have done that because of the late in life reports of child abuse. I hate to say it (Catholic here) but the Church abuse scandals have played a role in that. - ETA - I’d add the aftereffects of Epstein, Weinstein, Woody Allen, & other MeToo stories that came out about girls & young women too stunned or intimidated to speak out or file charges after their experiences.

[TBayXXXVII 2,659]

4 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I don’t think NY was the only place to do that. Different states have done that because of the late in life reports of child abuse. I hate to say it (Catholic here) but the Church abuse scandals have played a role in that. - ETA - I’d add the aftereffects of Epstein, Weinstein, Woody Allen, & other MeToo stories that came out about girls & young women too stunned or intimidated to speak out or file charges after their experiences.

Ok, so then you should have no problem with changing the S.O.L., after the fact,  right?

[shadrap 253]

3 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Ok, so then you should have no problem with changing the S.O.L., after the fact,  right?

sid has no problem with that so long it's his preferred political party doing the changing.  shocker!

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

12 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Ok, so then you should have no problem with changing the S.O.L., after the fact,  right?

You’re saying NY changed the law after Trump was charged? Or do you mean changing the law after people had already escaped the Sol was unfair generally? Nine states did this not just NY.

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

12 hours ago, shadrap said:

sid has no problem with that so long it's his preferred political party doing the changing.  shocker!

Iirc Weinstein was a prominent Dem donor who got brought down by the extension of sol. And really imo getting Epstein & Maxwell made it worth it almost on its own.

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

Federal judge rules U.S. attorney in California has been 'unlawfully serving' in role — Judge J. Michael Seabright found that Trump appointee Bilal Essayli unlawfully assumed the post after resigning in July as interim U.S. attorney for the Central District of California.

This is influential to the Comey/James cases in that Trump has been emotionally replacing US Attorneys on the slightest whim. Halligan got “appointed” the same way.

[TBayXXXVII 2,659]

2 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

You’re saying NY changed the law after Trump was charged? Or do you mean changing the law after people had already escaped the Sol was unfair generally? Nine states did this not just NY.

No, I'm saying that NYC changed their S.O.L. so that E. Jean Carroll could accuse Trump of sexual assault and allow for him to be tried for it.  This was done, purposefully, to interfere with the election.  You understand that, right?

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

18 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

No, I'm saying that NYC changed their S.O.L. so that E. Jean Carroll could accuse Trump of sexual assault and allow for him to be tried for it.  This was done, purposefully, to interfere with the election.  You understand that, right?

It was changed after Weinstein’s conviction was overturned.

Weinstein was a notorious Democratic megadonor.

- eta - also “

Paulin said 16 other states have similar laws, as does the federal government.”

[TBayXXXVII 2,659]

12 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

It was changed after Weinstein’s conviction was overturned.

Weinstein was a notorious Democratic megadonor.

- eta - also “

Paulin said 16 other states have similar laws, as does the federal government.”

Ok, my bad.  I thought I read they extended the law by 6 months, so that she could file her suit.  What I read was that the window expired in 6 months.

[SaintsInDome2006 617]

Comey has filed a new motion to dismiss, on additional grounds.

- Cruz screwed up the question. He was asking about McCabe & the leak was made by a totally different person.

- Comey’s testimony - which merely said he wasn’t revisiting his testimony - was true.If Cruz wanted to refresh Comey’s statement he should have asked it as a new question.

This isn’t quite as dumb as the James case but it’s a lot funnier considering it’s centered around Cruz’s muffing the play.