Nancy Pelosi plans to retire in 2027

[TBayXXXVII 2,676]

18 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

He should be next. Not because of ideology but because of energy. Frankly, young people have more energy that old fogies like Schumer, Pelosi, and myself. Time to move on. 

The younger people are socialists, so yeah, it's ideology. 

[Fnord 2,598]

13 hours ago, BrahmaBulls said:

It's always But Trump.  Trump has nothing to do with Pelosi and her insider trading.

I did not claim he did.

And yeah, it pretty much is always but Trump. Ya know why? Because any complaint you want to register about the gov't better start with him. He's guilty of everything he accuses others of doing, and usually to a much more egregious degree. So a Trump voter complaining about Pelosi making money in the market is laughable considering the Trump family has made $8 billion this year primarily from crypto, which he has worked hard to keep deregulated, to foist onto investors, and use as a gigantic bribery fund. Nancy is small potatoes.

Investigate them all!

[BrahmaBulls 950]

17 minutes ago, Fnord said:

I did not claim he did.

And yeah, it pretty much is always but Trump. Ya know why? Because any complaint you want to register about the gov't better start with him. He's guilty of everything he accuses others of doing, and usually to a much more egregious degree. So a Trump voter complaining about Pelosi making money in the market is laughable considering the Trump family has made $8 billion this year primarily from crypto, which he has worked hard to keep deregulated, to foist onto investors, and use as a gigantic bribery fund. Nancy is small potatoes.

Investigate them all!

You can discuss Trump and insider trading in a Trump thread.  This one is about Pelosi and nothing Trump does affects her shady career.  Congrats on your whataboutism to deflect though.  Just another reason to not discuss things with you.

[Fnord 2,598]

5 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

You can discuss Trump and insider trading in a Trump thread.  This one is about Pelosi and nothing Trump does affects her shady career.  Congrats on your whataboutism to deflect though.  Just another reason to not discuss things with you.

Whataboutisms are out of bounds now? Better let your "B-B-B-BUT B-B-B-BIDEN!" crew know.

You seem intimidated.

[Meglamaniac 804]

13 minutes ago, Fnord said:

 

You seem intimidated.

By a Ford, LOL, maybe by a Ferrari or a Porche but a Ford, no

[Tree of Knowledge 2,190]

Does Paul have to turn in his back stage pass at Ping Pong Comet Pizza?

[Maximum Overkill 2,528]

19 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Does Paul have to turn in his back stage pass at Ping Pong Comet Pizza?

Nope, he's an honorary lifetime member 

[HellToupee 2,294]

Can you imagine this

 

“Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi took out two PPP COVID relief loans for $711,708 & $996,392. 

Both were forgiven.”

[Strike 6,030]

On 11/6/2025 at 6:25 PM, The Real timschochet said:

Not at all. I’m pretty sure she’s been engaged in insider trading. Nobody however has any proof. Does that put a blot for me on her record? Of course. Does it change my estimation of her as the greatest Speaker ever? It doesn’t. Does it in any way excuse the shameful and juvenile and offensive attacks made against her and her husband here and elsewhere? It does not. 

And it’s really hard to take you guys seriously when you defend every corrupt thing the President does.  

Of course there's proof.  The problem is proof to you is her being deposed and admitting to it.  That's your level of proof.  It is statistically IMPOSSIBLE for her and her husband to have achieved the gains they have in the stock market absent insider knowledge.  Statistics is admissible proof in court.  DNA evidence is not to a 100% certainty but the statistical probability of it being wrong is so low that juries accept it as 100% true.  The statistical likelihood of Pelosi being able to do what she's done in the stock market is also very low and should be treated as 100% true.  But that will never be good enough because she's (d)ifferent.