Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
phan a tic

The latest OJ series

Recommended Posts

Last night I watched 4 of the newest shows in this the 3rd or 4th OJ series.

Nothing has changed my mind on this topic since the beginning EXCEPT now I have come to the conclusion that Jason was indeed involved. What a whack job that guy is. And quite violent.

Much more information on his anger about Nicole, et al not coming to the restaurant where he was chef on that night. Plus, he wrote in by hand his time card that day and none of the other days were.

Really really surprised that the Law didn't investigate him moreso.

 

Anybody watch? If so, any opinions change?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've them recorded, will watch this week..... But my mom has been insistent about Jason for a while now. She gave me a book on his son being involved... I do not think OJ did this by himself, he had to have help... But I'm not sold if it was Jason or possibly even Glenn Rodgers - who claims he did it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What there's ANOTHER OJ series?

Hopefully this is the one where the POS dies at the end. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fact: OJ had a history of domestic violence.

Fact: OJ had a pair of Bruno Magli shoes the same style and size as the killer.

Fact: OJ had clothes, a passport, $8,000 in cash and a false beard/mustache in Al Collins Bronco.

Fact: OJ filmed a movie where knife skills were required called 'Frogmen'. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109850/

Fact: Ron Goldman had blunt force trauma as well as being stabbed repeatedly. This tends to dismiss those that claim he couldn't have taken both of them out like he did.

 

Those are beside the fact that his DNA was at the scene and Nicole's was in his vehicle.

 

The glove? Anyone who has played golf and tried to put on a golf glove that's been wet knows it won't fit right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those are beside the fact that his DNA was at the scene and Nicole's was in his vehicle.

There's no denying the blood found in the bronco.. But that very blood is what hangs me up. We were told they found a drop of it here, a drop of it there, another drop next to that - where was the rest of it? That murder scene was a slaughter house and it was clearly evident that a violent struggle ensued throughout it. I find it very hard to believe that the killer wasn't just covered in blood - and I find it equally hard to believe he would of not left blood all over that bronco - not just single drops here and there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no denying the blood found in the bronco.. But that very blood is what hangs me up. We were told they found a drop of it here, a drop of it there, another drop next to that - where was the rest of it? That murder scene was a slaughter house and it was clearly evident that a violent struggle ensued throughout it. I find it very hard to believe that the killer wasn't just covered in blood - and I find it equally hard to believe he would of not left blood all over that bronco - not just single drops here and there.

 

So he changed clothes out in the driveway and bagged them up. Who knows. The point is there was her blood in there and I think his at the scene (his finger got cut during the attack).

 

We need Gepetto in here to tell us how it was a foreign faction that killed em

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So he changed clothes out in the driveway and bagged them up. Who knows. The point is there was her blood in there and I think his at the scene (his finger got cut during the attack).

I don't think there is any question he was there... I'm saying there should have been more blood - it should have been all over him............. Took a spare set of clothes, bagged them up, yet still left drops of blood here and there? Seems like a stretch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there is any question he was there... I'm saying there should have been more blood - it should have been all over him............. Took a spare set of clothes, bagged them up, yet still left drops of blood here and there? Seems like a stretch.

 

It was dark and he could have easily missed a drop or two.

 

There's some quote somewhere about how many mistakes one makes when committing a crime and they're fortunate if they can remember a handful of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It was dark and he could have easily missed a drop or two.

 

There's some quote somewhere about how many mistakes one makes when committing a crime and they're fortunate if they can remember a handful of them.

I will always believe he was involved and I will always believe he should have been put to death for those murders... But I will always wonder if somebody else did the majority of the killings.

 

This was a vicious, ferocious, adrenaline rushed attack - with slaughter house blood all over the place... To buy into that he, in the heat of the moment, had the wherewithal to take spare clothes, hurriedly clean up (getting damn near all of it), rush back to his house, speed thru the house, clean up some more, then back out to meet a ride to the airport? Big reach for me to get to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will always believe he was involved and I will always believe he should have been put to death for those murders... But I will always wonder if somebody else did the majority of the killings.

 

This was a vicious, ferocious, adrenaline rushed attack - with slaughter house blood all over the place... To buy into that he, in the heat of the moment, had the wherewithal to take spare clothes, hurriedly clean up (getting damn near all of it), rush back to his house, speed thru the house, clean up some more, then back out to meet a ride to the airport? Big reach for me to get to.

 

Timelines are based upon estimates.

 

As far as physically overpowering a skinny chick and waiter type guy, O.J. isn't a little guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you remember the trial or subsequent conversations with witnesses, Dr Henry Lee was one who pissed me off the most.

Although I don't think he outright lied, what I hated was he kept using words like 'possible' and 'maybe' and 'very well could be'.

I remember him describing the '''''2nd set of footprints'''''. He explained why those prints were only visible in the immediate killing zone and not exiting in either direction. He said at the time AND since that the blood just wore off after a few steps.

Great forensic scientist? Are you kidding me! He was a paid SHILL designed to mislead and misrepresent the facts.

If he was so smart, he would have immediately recognised those 'marks' as being a perfect match for the blood stained corduroy slacks Ron Goldman was wearing and obviously did not leave the scene. Shoe prints? Bullshiit!

 

Furthermore, my own personal unsubstantiated opinion is and has always been that the dream team paid off Furhman AND Chris Darden to play the roles they did. Darden not only did the stupidiest thing any attorney could do but he did it WITHOUT Marcia Clark's approval.

 

One last thing; during a recent interview with one of the jurors who was a black lady, (after OJ was nailed in that Las Vegas scam) she indicated that even though OJ was probably guilty of the double murders, she voted not guilty ''BECAUSE HE WAS ONE OF HER KIND'' but he'd have to get out of the Vegas thing on his own.

ISN'T THAT A JAILABLE OFFENSE? Admitting she voted non guilty because he was black AND NOT BASED ON FACTS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One last thing; during a recent interview with one of the jurors who was a black lady, (after OJ was nailed in that Las Vegas scam) she indicated that even though OJ was probably guilty of the double murders, she voted not guilty ''BECAUSE HE WAS ONE OF HER KIND'' but he'd have to get out of the Vegas thing on his own.

ISN'T THAT A JAILABLE OFFENSE? Admitting she voted non guilty because he was black AND NOT BASED ON FACTS.

The State could of had a video of OJ committing these murders - once Fuhrman was busted saying the "N" word, this case was over.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finished up all the episodes on this last night....... I have no illusions as to why OJ got off. Ultimately, this trial had nothing to do with a murder.. Ultimately, well - we all know what this trial was about.

 

That being said, every time I watch stuff on this case - it really boils my blood. Even all this time later, I'm still amazed how much Dead-to-Rights evidence there was against OJ, and this piece of shiit still got off.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It truly was a perfect storm of sh!t that came together to get OJ off.

 

One of the interesting aspects that I never knew about was the lady that said she almost crashed into OJ's Bronco that night somewhere close to Nicole's condo, which would have put him near the scene at around the time of the murders. But she wasn't allowed to testify by the prosecution because she did a TV interview and was paid $5000 for it.

 

Also, the private detective that said he was staking out a residence close by Nicole's and saw OJ get out of the Bronco and Jason jump from the passenger side to the drivers side. He has been keeping it a secret for 20+ year and just now decided to come forward with his story. he said he was fearful that he would be blamed for the murders. :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finished up all the episodes on this last night....... I have no illusions as to why OJ got off. Ultimately, this trial had nothing to do with a murder.. Ultimately, well - we all know what this trial was about.

 

That being said, every time I watch stuff on this case - it really boils my blood. Even all this time later, I'm still amazed how much Dead-to-Rights evidence there was against OJ, and this piece of shiit still got off.

 

My thoughts exactly man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fact: OJ had a history of domestic violence.

Fact: OJ had a pair of Bruno Magli shoes the same style and size as the killer.

Fact: OJ had clothes, a passport, $8,000 in cash and a false beard/mustache in Al Collins Bronco.

Fact: OJ filmed a movie where knife skills were required called 'Frogmen'. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109850/

Fact: Ron Goldman had blunt force trauma as well as being stabbed repeatedly. This tends to dismiss those that claim he couldn't have taken both of them out like he did.

 

Those are beside the fact that his DNA was at the scene and Nicole's was in his vehicle.

 

The glove? Anyone who has played golf and tried to put on a golf glove that's been wet knows it won't fit right.

 

This evidence is basically all that needs to be said. The fake stache and shoes are pretty much game over. It's common knowledge the trial verdict was payback for Rodney King.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's common knowledge the trial verdict was payback for Rodney King.

9 of the 12 jurors were African American, 8 of those were women.... On the heels of Rodney King, in that town ----------Church.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×