Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
bno70_1

New Math uncovered!

Recommended Posts

You have to check this out!

 

without cancelling

 

Team A

TO - 18 points

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 54 points

 

Team B

Manning - 10 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 40 points

 

result, Team B loses!

 

WITH da cancel

 

Team A

TO - 0 points !!!!! (notice the cancel) !!

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 36 points

 

Team B

Romo - 9 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 39 points

 

result, even by scoring less points, team B NOW wins!!!!

 

how can you not cancel!?!?!

 

also, I am doing some calculations on "double the points" and "the hook up" !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to check this out!

 

without cancelling

 

Team A

TO - 18 points

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 54 points

 

Team B

Manning - 10 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 40 points

 

result, Team B loses!

 

WITH da cancel

 

Team A

TO - 0 points !!!!! (notice the cancel) !!

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 36 points

 

Team B

Romo - 9 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 39 points

 

result, even by scoring less points, team B NOW wins!!!!

 

how can you not cancel!?!?!

 

also, I am doing some calculations on "double the points" and "the hook up" !

 

This whole concept was retarded enough...so let's create a 2nd to further fish?!?

 

Note: Da retardation!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You have to check this out!

 

without cancelling

 

Team A

TO - 18 points

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 54 points

 

Team B

Manning - 10 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 40 points

 

result, Team B loses!

 

WITH da cancel

 

Team A

TO - 0 points !!!!! (notice the cancel) !!

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 36 points

 

Team B

Romo - 9 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 39 points

 

result, even by scoring less points, team B NOW wins!!!!

 

how can you not cancel!?!?!

 

also, I am doing some calculations on "double the points" and "the hook up" !

 

Uh... What the hell are you talking about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest _my_2_cents_

You know, I often mock cancel-out theorists, but I am starting TJ Housh this week (because he's my best WR) and my opponent happens to have Palmer.

 

Not going to say it's a cancel out, but in a PPR, 6 Pt RecTD/4 Pt PaTD league with .1/1 RecYd and .1/2.5 PaYd, it sure sould seem like if my opponent's QB throws TJ 7 receptions for 87 yds and a TD it works out better for me.

 

It's noce cancellation, but it definately puts me in an advantage that her QB helps me more than her if Palmer throws to Housh.

 

With those stats, I get 7+8.7+6 = 21.7 points, where she gets 3.5+4 = 7.5 points.

 

Of course Palmer will throw to other receivers and may even get a couple TDs to others, but still....when scoring is imbalanced in favor of the WR, it seems that you can "cancel" a little bit of your opponent's production. Not to the extent to call it "cancel out theory" but there's no question I benefit more from a big Palmer day than she does, IF my WR gets the receptions.

 

That said, I am fully aware that the only thing that matters is how my QB performs against her QB, how my WRs perform compared to her WRs, how my RBs perform compared to her RBs, etc, etc, etc.

 

Cancellation doesn't exist. But it will for that game, isolated in a vacuum. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How do TO's points go from 18 to 0?

 

They were "cancelled out". Pay attention please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How do TO's points go from 18 to 0?

 

Team B starts the stud WR's QB ensuring that for every score the WR makes the QB gets credit too. So, you in effect are cancelling out that players points...the end result was a net gain of points for team B.

 

It's a strategy you can only emply once or twice a year, really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any Strategy that involves starting Romo over Manning is not a very good one. Unless of course you were talking about Eli. Then It was stupid to play him over Romo in the first place. Either way the example is flawed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Team B starts the stud WR's QB ensuring that for every score the WR makes the QB gets credit too. So, you in effect are cancelling out that players points...the end result was a net gain of points for team B.

 

It's a strategy you can only emply once or twice a year, really.

 

and only if the player you bring in to cancel out another is the highest FF scorer on the week

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Team B starts the stud WR's QB ensuring that for every score the WR makes the QB gets credit too. So, you in effect are cancelling out that players points...the end result was a net gain of points for team B.

 

It's a strategy you can only emply once or twice a year, really.

 

We get 1 pt / 20 yards passing and 3 pts for passing TD's. So, the QB only cancels out half the WR production.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You have to check this out!

 

without cancelling

 

Team A

TO - 18 points

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 54 points

 

Team B

Manning - 10 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 40 points

 

result, Team B loses!

 

WITH da cancel

 

Team A

TO - 0 points !!!!! (notice the cancel) !!

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 36 points

 

Team B

Romo - 9 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 39 points

 

result, even by scoring less points, team B NOW wins!!!!

 

how can you not cancel!?!?!

 

also, I am doing some calculations on "double the points" and "the hook up" !

 

You make no sense. I've tried to read you example about 3 times and it makes no sense.

 

You are dumb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must admit - the example is missing all sorts of pertinent information.

 

I have this hotdog weiner theory....

 

Team A

wieners yes + bun = baseball

 

Team B

relish - mustard +ketchup = condiments

 

 

How can you not eat hotdogs at ballgames !?

 

 

What, you don't get it? pay attention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Team B starts the stud WR's QB ensuring that for every score the WR makes the QB gets credit too. So, you in effect are cancelling out that players points...the end result was a net gain of points for team B.

 

It's a strategy you can only emply once or twice a year, really.

 

"Fresh FISH on the line, aint nothing like that sh!t!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A year later, and you still haven't learned a thing. You're still the same nonsense believing and spewing dolt you were last year. Congratulations!

 

:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You have to check this out!

 

without cancelling

 

Team A

TO - 18 points

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 54 points

 

Team B

Manning - 10 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 40 points

 

result, Team B loses!

 

WITH da cancel

 

Team A

TO - 0 points !!!!! (notice the cancel) !!

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 36 points

 

Team B

Romo - 9 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 39 points

 

result, even by scoring less points, team B NOW wins!!!!

 

how can you not cancel!?!?!

 

also, I am doing some calculations on "double the points" and "the hook up" !

 

:blink: So... are you saying I should start Stephen Davis?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any Strategy that involves starting Romo over Manning is not a very good one. Unless of course you were talking about Eli. Then It was stupid to play him over Romo in the first place. Either way the example is flawed.

 

 

Didn't Romo outscore Manning last Week? If you looked at the matchups and thought Romo was going to score more points so you started him and he does outscore Manning I don't see how that strategy could be flawed. Now I would've started Manning against the Saints over Romo but starting the player you thought would score the most points cannot be flawed if he actually does score the most points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A year later, and you still haven't learned a thing. You're still the same nonsense believing and spewing dolt you were last year. Congratulations!

 

:blink:

Isn't there some reckage somewhere you should be pulling survivors out of?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That said, I am fully aware that the only thing that matters is how my QB performs against her QB, how my WRs perform compared to her WRs, how my RBs perform compared to her RBs, etc, etc, etc.

 

Cancellation doesn't exist. But it will for that game, isolated in a vacuum. lol

 

 

It doesn't matter how my QB performs against her QB, or how my RB's perform against her RB's etc. . All that matters is that my total points are more than hers. Unless you play in some kind of positional match play league that I haven't heard about

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Didn't Romo outscore Manning last Week? If you looked at the matchups and thought Romo was going to score more points so you started him and he does outscore Manning I don't see how that strategy could be flawed. Now I would've started Manning against the Saints over Romo but starting the player you thought would score the most points cannot be flawed if he actually does score the most points.

Uh, did anyone project Romo to score more than Peyton? No! So starting Romo over Peyton would have been a bad strategy. It might have worked out this time, but it is a bad strategy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Team B starts the stud WR's QB ensuring that for every score the WR makes the QB gets credit too. So, you in effect are cancelling out that players points...the end result was a net gain of points for team B.

 

It's a strategy you can only emply once or twice a year, really.

 

If TO has 18 and he starts Romo and he has 9 how does that cancel TO out? Bad math in the example.

 

But anyway WR's in standard leagues get 6 for a TD and QB's 4 for throwing one. And WRs 1 point for every 10 yards and QB's 1 point for every 25 yards. I don't think it adds up to cancelling him out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest _my_2_cents_
It doesn't matter how my QB performs against her QB, or how my RB's perform against her RB's etc. . All that matters is that my total points are more than hers. Unless you play in some kind of positional match play league that I haven't heard about

 

I was just running with it. What, the OP is the only one allowed to use fuzzy logic? Nice double standard. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Isn't there some reckage somewhere you should be pulling survivors out of?

 

Wrong poster dumbass!

 

But keep believing in fairy tales. You must be really excited that you get to spend an entire night in the pumpkin patch soon waiting for the Great Pumpkin to arrive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wrong poster dumbass!

 

But keep believing in fairy tales. You must be really excited that you get to spend an entire night in the pumpkin patch soon waiting for the Great Pumpkin to arrive.

I'm not sure, but I think the OP is making fun of the cancel out theory. I don't know for certain though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You have to check this out!

 

without cancelling

 

Team A

TO - 18 points

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 54 points

 

Team B

Manning - 10 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 40 points

 

result, Team B loses!

 

WITH da cancel

 

Team A

TO - 0 points !!!!! (notice the cancel) !!

LT - 30 points

Gonzo - 6 points

etc

total: 36 points

 

Team B

Romo - 9 points

LJ - 20 points

Gates - 10 points

etc

total: 39 points

 

result, even by scoring less points, team B NOW wins!!!!

 

how can you not cancel!?!?!

 

also, I am doing some calculations on "double the points" and "the hook up" !

 

 

I'm waiting on your "double the points" and "the hook up" calc's.

I'm ready to ammend my "retarded math principles book".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×