Sean Mooney

So the "libertarian" loves the government helping control late night TV?

I didn't expect you would say you did hear it. It's fine. You need to delete your account and leave. That is the one issue that would unite all sides of the political aisle here

I'm a devout Christian. I do not use the Bible as a weapon. Only a hypocritical religious asshat would do that.

Sunk cost fallacy running strong with them

I thought Tyler Robinson shot the messenger? More seriously- the thing with Kirk's comments are: whether you find him "hateful" or not is going to depend on your starting point in a lot of cases. For me, his stuff is murky because he used the Bible as a weapon and he edited videos together in a way to make him come off superior to the people he was debating as a means of building a portfolio for himself. In many cases he was debating a hysterical 20 year old weirdo so he was going to seem normal and rational based off how the opposition was portrayed (either by their own accord or how they were presented).

I mistakenly omitted the part that the left has opened up the idea of martyrdom as it pertains to Kirk and will create some more people falling to his side.

Stupid....

The Kirk murder will affect both political sides- it will be used to demonize the left and trans people further. But on the far right it will lead to deeper distrust of government and more money for the grifters.

HT is another clown show here. Flip him and MO onto ignore or just scroll past them. Besides it's funny to watch them try desperately to get you engage with them when you have no intention of doing so.

The bolded part is the most important thing and it's why hero worship of politicians, and all the fighting over them is idiotic.

I think you guys might have head injuries. In 2003 there wasn't a divide between the two sides? Okay. Furthermore, all I did was point out the actual scenario where canceling was accused because the dipsh!t had the wrong time. Then he asked for an example and I gave him a clear example of a corporate company banning their stations from playing the music. That didn't count because they didn't have holes in their necks from a rifle. That's an insane argument being presented back to me when I was literally just providing info.

I have played plenty of football in my life. I know quite a bit about it. You are adding tons of things to the discussion that have nothing to do with anything related to this- especially when I agreed the offensive line is offsides. And if the interior OL is getting a "split second" head start- that's a false start. So maybe it is you who knows nothing about football. The larger point is- the one thing you could possible argue is that by the center being able to line up ahead of the ball it gives them a little extra leverage pushing forward. But even that can be negated depending on how strong the push is the defensive line gets.

The bill was written in 2013 and had floors built into it so if the price stayed above a certain floor it would go up. That triggered in 2023 . But again- it was written in a way so it baked into transportation infrastructure....so you could get rid of it but it would require figuring out how to gain back- on average- 65 cents a gallon on gas/diesel.

I don't disagree. I mentioned before here about PA and how their gas prices are high because Republicans raised gas taxes years ago and then baked those taxes into funding formulas so it was impossible to repeal them without messing up funding for other things. I was told it was ONLY Biden's policies doing it. It's almost as if a lot of people here who devote themselves to politics talk don't understand anything other than what all the screamers on television tell them to think

The play's success doesn't hinge on 4 inches. The play;'s success is more based on the rule change 20 years ago to allow people to push the ball carrier forward. Until you get rid of that the play will succeed far more than it fails. Weird post from you.