locogrande 0 Posted September 22, 2007 MBIII has been money this year - but anyone besides me thinking this might be a week to "rest" him? Chicago did will against both LT and LJ so far, and given barber's 50% share of carries, I am unsure of how much we can really expect from him this week. Personally, I am considering removing him from my flex spot in favor of a WR like S.Moss - but I'm interested to hear what other owners are thinking ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pimptaddy 0 Posted September 22, 2007 I would not be surprised if MBIII got a TD and 40-50 yards Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msudavedawg 5 Posted September 22, 2007 Bears will likely give Dallas a short field more than once thanks to Grossman. I see T.O and MBIII both hitting paydirt, maybe Witten too before it is all over. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
texasclaw 0 Posted September 22, 2007 people have obviously overdosed on the Cowboy Coolaid at this point... CHI is playing at home with a nasty D. Rex blows, but he will throw the deep ball to Berrian and the Dallas secondary looks suspect. Everyone keeps mentioning Rex playing from behind. But, I would not be at all surprised to see Romo playing from behind. All in all, these predictions of Cowboys greenlights from Barber to Witten to TO to Romo are all somewhat laughable. Could they be right? Sure. But, until proven otherwise CHI DST is an automatic caution IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pimptaddy 0 Posted September 22, 2007 people have obviously overdosed on the Cowboy Coolaid at this point... CHI is playing at home with a nasty D. Rex blows, but he will throw the deep ball to Berrian and the Dallas secondary looks suspect. Everyone keeps mentioning Rex playing from behind. But, I would not be at all surprised to see Romo playing from behind. All in all, these predictions of Cowboys greenlights from Barber to Witten to TO to Romo are all somewhat laughable. Could they be right? Sure. But, until proven otherwise CHI DST is an automatic caution IMO. Rex Grossman is an automatic caution for his team. The guy is a lock to throw at least 2 ints. Give me MBIII on with a short field and he gets paid. The Bears offense is horrible and the Cowboys D is underrated. Seriously, we lose our starting NT and Ellis and Newman are not playing and we are now the colts of 3-4 years ago with no defense. Dallas can overcome the bears D more than the grossman can overcome the cowboys D. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Walter34 3 Posted September 22, 2007 The Bears have given up 2.4 yds per rush on 60 carries against LT and LJ. Act accordingly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
My_Dixie_Normus 0 Posted September 22, 2007 people have obviously overdosed on the Cowboy Coolaid at this point... CHI is playing at home with a nasty D. Rex blows, but he will throw the deep ball to Berrian and the Dallas secondary looks suspect. Everyone keeps mentioning Rex playing from behind. But, I would not be at all surprised to see Romo playing from behind. All in all, these predictions of Cowboys greenlights from Barber to Witten to TO to Romo are all somewhat laughable. Could they be right? Sure. But, until proven otherwise CHI DST is an automatic caution IMO. I'd have to agree with the exception of TO and maybe Witten but too a much less extent. The Bears lost FS Mike Brown for the season. Brown is a guy those outside Chicago would only know if you played in deep IDP leagues. He has been hurt every year. But when he plays, he is a difference maker. Well he is not playing. It changes the way the Bears play the middle of the field, the most easily exploited area in the cover two. Urlacher will tend to stay in coverage rather than pressure the QB and play the run. He cheats to the deep middle off the snap. It opens up the run too but this year vs. last the Bears are tougher on the line with a healthy Tommie Harris and former Eagle Darwin Walker at tackle (Ian Scott and Tank Johnson finished 2006). These two guys plus Briggs and Hillenmeyer will contain the run all night. For the Cowboys to be successful, they will need to exploit Danieal Manning at FS and Urlacher in isolation. It feels weird just writing that the Cowboys should go at Urlacher but with the way he will have to compensate for the loss of Brown, I would be sending Witten and TO across the middle of the field all day. The Bear corners are adequate who look better because of the strong rush. But my game plan would be to use Witten early to set up TO late in the game. Right now, that is the only crack in the best defense in the conference. If Manning steps up and plays, the Cowboys are in trouble. Just my .02¢. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest _my_2_cents_ Posted September 22, 2007 If Manning steps up and plays, the Cowboys are in trouble. Just my .02¢. Manning's on the Bears? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted September 22, 2007 Manning's on the Bears? The corner? ETA: I think they moved him to safety, actually. Maybe. Hell, maybe I'm wrong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest _my_2_cents_ Posted September 22, 2007 The corner? ETA: I think they moved him to safety, actually. Maybe. Hell, maybe I'm wrong. ahhhhhhhhhhhh, yes indeedy. I confused myself with beer. Carry on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
My_Dixie_Normus 0 Posted September 22, 2007 Manning's on the Bears? The RIF bus didn't stop in your neighborhood, did it? For the Cowboys to be successful, they will need to exploit Danieal Manning at FS and Urlacher in isolation. It feels weird just writing that the Cowboys should go at Urlacher but with the way he will have to compensate for the loss of Brown, I would be sending Witten and TO across the middle of the field all day. The Bear corners are adequate who look better because of the strong rush. But my game plan would be to use Witten early to set up TO late in the game. Right now, that is the only crack in the best defense in the conference. If Manning steps up and plays, the Cowboys are in trouble. Danieal Manning has taken over as Chicago's starting free safety following the season ending loss of Mike Brown. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sweetness_34 0 Posted September 22, 2007 Cowboys D is underrated. 287 yards + 2 TDs passing to Trent Green 312 yards + 4 TDs passing to Eli Manning And do you even remember the hammering the cowgirls secondary took from the Saints or Lions or Seahawks (playoff) last year? Quit your delusional homerism....you are clueless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sweetness_34 0 Posted September 22, 2007 I'd have to agree with the exception of TO and maybe Witten but too a much less extent. The Bears lost FS Mike Brown for the season. Brown is a guy those outside Chicago would only know if you played in deep IDP leagues. He has been hurt every year. But when he plays, he is a difference maker. Well he is not playing. It changes the way the Bears play the middle of the field, the most easily exploited area in the cover two. Urlacher will tend to stay in coverage rather than pressure the QB and play the run. He cheats to the deep middle off the snap. It opens up the run too but this year vs. last the Bears are tougher on the line with a healthy Tommie Harris and former Eagle Darwin Walker at tackle (Ian Scott and Tank Johnson finished 2006). These two guys plus Briggs and Hillenmeyer will contain the run all night. For the Cowboys to be successful, they will need to exploit Danieal Manning at FS and Urlacher in isolation. It feels weird just writing that the Cowboys should go at Urlacher but with the way he will have to compensate for the loss of Brown, I would be sending Witten and TO across the middle of the field all day. The Bear corners are adequate who look better because of the strong rush. But my game plan would be to use Witten early to set up TO late in the game. Right now, that is the only crack in the best defense in the conference. If Manning steps up and plays, the Cowboys are in trouble. Just my .02¢. Mr Dixie Manning has looked very good in place of Mike Brown....he already has one int. He actually has better speed/size/athleticism than Mike Brown. All he needed was some experience and after starting all of last year, he has that. The Bears D is gonna kill the cowgirls and the Bears O will pass for at least 250+ on that sorry cowgirls defense. Bears should win.....should be a good game though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sweetness_34 0 Posted September 22, 2007 people have obviously overdosed on the Cowboy Coolaid at this point... CHI is playing at home with a nasty D. Rex blows, but he will throw the deep ball to Berrian and the Dallas secondary looks suspect. Everyone keeps mentioning Rex playing from behind. But, I would not be at all surprised to see Romo playing from behind. All in all, these predictions of Cowboys greenlights from Barber to Witten to TO to Romo are all somewhat laughable. Could they be right? Sure. But, until proven otherwise CHI DST is an automatic caution IMO. Good post. Greg Olsen will play too this week. Bears should win at home....it is going to be like a playoff game and the crowd will be crazy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sweetness_34 0 Posted September 22, 2007 MBIII has been money this year - but anyone besides me thinking this might be a week to "rest" him? Chicago did will against both LT and LJ so far, and given barber's 50% share of carries, I am unsure of how much we can really expect from him this week. Personally, I am considering removing him from my flex spot in favor of a WR like S.Moss - but I'm interested to hear what other owners are thinking ... You should not even think twice. Cowboys will be lucky to get any goal line carries and even if they get close to the redzone, Bears should stop MBIII. Maybe he gets a lucky TD from a 1st and goal situation, but if I were you, instead of relying on that, I would start Moss against a very bad Giants secondary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hadji 0 Posted September 22, 2007 Mr Dixie Manning has looked very good in place of Mike Brown....he already has one int. He actually has better speed/size/athleticism than Mike Brown. All he needed was some experience and after starting all of last year, he has that. The Bears D is gonna kill the cowgirls and the Bears O will pass for at least 250+ on that sorry cowgirls defense. Bears should win.....should be a good game though. If you're talking about speed, Manning was actually #1 in the combine behind Devin Hester. I think he'll be fine. Buckle up, fellas. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
My_Dixie_Normus 0 Posted September 22, 2007 Mr Dixie Manning has looked very good in place of Mike Brown....he already has one int. He actually has better speed/size/athleticism than Mike Brown. All he needed was some experience and after starting all of last year, he has that. The Bears D is gonna kill the cowgirls and the Bears O will pass for at least 250+ on that sorry cowgirls defense. Bears should win.....should be a good game though. Athletically, he matches up with Brown. But Brown was the one of the best players on that defense. Manning might become good, why not on that defense. But he has a long way to go to get to Brown's category. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aggiewildlife 0 Posted September 22, 2007 Look what Tomlinson did against Chicago. Now consider a less talented, less experienced back (MB3) who is a backup and should expect 50% of the carries at most. Any reason to think he'd be a good start? I didn't think so either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chicosbailbond 0 Posted September 23, 2007 okay.. it seems like everyone agrees that Barber has a shot at a td with limited yardage potential... well what's the big deal... that sounds okay for a flex position... that's what MBIII is right???? I usually start a RB at my flex b/c they have a better shot at a TD on a weekly basis... I do concede that this week I may roll with a WR option instead of MBIII... but my WR options are that great... so... I am rolling with MBIII and hoping he gets a TD... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Walter34 3 Posted September 23, 2007 okay.. it seems like everyone agrees that Barber has a shot at a td with limited yardage potential... No, everyone does not agree. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
My_Dixie_Normus 0 Posted September 23, 2007 No, everyone does not agree. LT and LJ would probably disagree too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GridIronAssassin#1 0 Posted September 23, 2007 I'm going to play Deshaun Foster over Marian Barber III and hope all works out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
devius 4 Posted September 24, 2007 hope you guys started barber Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
devius 4 Posted September 24, 2007 Look what Tomlinson did against Chicago. Now consider a less talented, less experienced back (MB3) who is a backup and should expect 50% of the carries at most. Any reason to think he'd be a good start? I didn't think so either. ouch.... nice call Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vikings4ever 496 Posted September 24, 2007 hope you guys started barber for Lamont and Rudi. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mephisto 15 Posted September 24, 2007 Maybe Marion Barber will get some props when he breaks LT's TD record. Focking morons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Echo52 0 Posted September 24, 2007 Beginning to think Gore gets to ride the bench in favor of Barber Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cretins 21 Posted September 24, 2007 And to think, I was actually debating between MBIII and MJD. In the end went with MBIII! Highest scorer on my roster, baby! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hyness 0 Posted September 24, 2007 This was the next to last time I will bench MBIII. The last time will be week 8 when he has his bye. I benched him for Jordan, so it only cost me 1.9 points. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest _my_2_cents_ Posted September 24, 2007 I started him at Flex, just like I drafted him to do. Never bench your studs. Admittedly he scared me at halftime with 3 carries for 7 yds, but 101 and 2 TDs is pretty solid I think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
devius 4 Posted September 24, 2007 Mr Dixie Manning has looked very good in place of Mike Brown....he already has one int. He actually has better speed/size/athleticism than Mike Brown. All he needed was some experience and after starting all of last year, he has that. The Bears D is gonna kill the cowgirls and the Bears O will pass for at least 250+ on that sorry cowgirls defense. Bears should win.....should be a good game though. You should not even think twice. Cowboys will be lucky to get any goal line carries and even if they get close to the redzone, Bears should stop MBIII. Maybe he gets a lucky TD from a 1st and goal situation, but if I were you, instead of relying on that, I would start Moss against a very bad Giants secondary. Mighty Bears got spanked by some cowgirls.... and im not a dallas fan... go pack! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thePRO 78 Posted September 24, 2007 You should not even think twice. Cowboys will be lucky to get any goal line carries and even if they get close to the redzone, Bears should stop MBIII. Maybe he gets a lucky TD from a 1st and goal situation, but if I were you, instead of relying on that, I would start Moss against a very bad Giants secondary. Lol hahahha not even close to the goal line? 34-10 gg and nice try...lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vince44 202 Posted September 24, 2007 Look what Tomlinson did against Chicago. Now consider a less talented, less experienced back (MB3) who is a backup and should expect 50% of the carries at most. Any reason to think he'd be a good start? I didn't think so either. I can only assume based on your posts in the last couple weeks you have to be a bitter JJ owner. You seem to go out of your way to cast doubt to those who praise MBIII. I didn't think he would rush for 100 yds last night based on the defense he faced and he splits carries...but the guy is a TD machine and that was proven yet again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
locogrande 0 Posted September 24, 2007 benched him for santana moss and it cost me my game this week. ah well. lesson learned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muzz 0 Posted September 24, 2007 Look what Tomlinson did against Chicago. Now consider a less talented, less experienced back (MB3) who is a backup and should expect 50% of the carries at most. Any reason to think he'd be a good start? I didn't think so either. LMAO How'd ya make out with this? Bahahahaha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muzz 0 Posted September 24, 2007 No, everyone does not agree. Thats right, you KNEW he was gonna bust a big one vs the Vaunted Chitown D !! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ryedog 0 Posted September 24, 2007 I benched MBIII for Reggie Bush so the verdict is still out to see if I am going to do this , Or this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muzz 0 Posted September 24, 2007 I benched MBIII for Reggie Bush so the verdict is still out to see if I am going to do this , Or this I suspect the latter... 120( total)/ 2 is gonna be hard to beat Share this post Link to post Share on other sites