Seriously FFToday, Wes Welker #12? Comeon!

[moviedude25 0]

This message goes out to the guys in charge of the FFToday rankings. Wes Welker is listed as the #12 WR this week. In a standard non ppr leagues, Wes Welker has been terrible. He doesn't get a lot of yards and hardly ever scores. His only value belongs in PPR leagues. When your posting rankings like you do and have a guy who's good only in leagues that most people don't play in it makes you look bad. Have you ever thought about doing two rankings to reflect PPR leagues and non PPR leagues to show the difference in value between the two? In a non PPR league Wes Welker is no where near going to be the 12th best WR in the league this or any week for that matter. On the season in a non PPR league with standard scoring of 1 point per 10 yards and 6 per TD he's scored:

 

Week 1 - 5

Week 2 - 7

Week 3 - 5

Week 5 - 7

Week 6 - 7

Week 7 - 13

Week 8 - 7

Week 9 - 3

Week 10 - 10

 

That's terrible. Why do you reflect rankings like this for players who aren't going to be ranked that high ever? What's the deal here?

[phan420 0]

This message goes out to the guys in charge of the FFToday rankings. Wes Welker is listed as the #12 WR this week. In a standard non ppr leagues, Wes Welker has been terrible. He doesn't get a lot of yards and hardly ever scores. His only value belongs in PPR leagues. When your posting rankings like you do and have a guy who's good only in leagues that most people don't play in it makes you look bad. Have you ever thought about doing two rankings to reflect PPR leagues and non PPR leagues to show the difference in value between the two? In a non PPR league Wes Welker is no where near going to be the 12th best WR in the league this or any week for that matter. On the season in a non PPR league with standard scoring of 1 point per 10 yards and 6 per TD he's scored:

 

Week 1 - 5

Week 2 - 7

Week 3 - 5

Week 5 - 7

Week 6 - 7

Week 7 - 13

Week 8 - 7

Week 9 - 3

Week 10 - 10

 

That's terrible. Why do you reflect rankings like this for players who aren't going to be ranked that high ever? What's the deal here?

 

[zaurg 0]

The guy doing the rankings missed the news clip about Brady going down with a torn ACL a few weeks ago.

[FeelingMN 273]

Why do you care one way or another?

 

If you don't think he'll perform according to his rank, then don't start him. It's your team, and your entry fee.

 

Christ people, they're just rankings. Either follow them, or don't but quit with all the b!tching.

[The Hood 9]

This message goes out to the guys in charge of the FFToday rankings. Wes Welker is listed as the #12 WR this week. In a standard non ppr leagues, Wes Welker has been terrible. He doesn't get a lot of yards and hardly ever scores. His only value belongs in PPR leagues. When your posting rankings like you do and have a guy who's good only in leagues that most people don't play in it makes you look bad. Have you ever thought about doing two rankings to reflect PPR leagues and non PPR leagues to show the difference in value between the two? In a non PPR league Wes Welker is no where near going to be the 12th best WR in the league this or any week for that matter. On the season in a non PPR league with standard scoring of 1 point per 10 yards and 6 per TD he's scored:

 

Week 1 - 5

Week 2 - 7

Week 3 - 5

Week 5 - 7

Week 6 - 7

Week 7 - 13

Week 8 - 7

Week 9 - 3

Week 10 - 10

 

That's terrible. Why do you reflect rankings like this for players who aren't going to be ranked that high ever? What's the deal here?

 

These threads are so focking stupid. He's ranked so high because they are guessing he finally scores another TD this week. Who the hell knows????

 

 

DUMB

[Nomad99 408]

New England Rec Yds Avg Lng

W. Welker 7 108 15.4 29

 

PPR league with .1pts per rec yd 1PPR 5pt bonus for 100 rec yds

 

22.8 PTS!

 

 

 

 

It's like a..........wait for it.............

 

BAD.......Movie.........DUDE

[Daves Take 0]

If you set yourself up properly on FFToday, you can input the scoring for each of your league's and then the rankings will automatically be adjusted.

[Kingstowne Dealers 14]

Welker scored 10 points in my standard league. How does that Crow taste?

[TD Ryan2 314]

FFToday > You

[phan420 0]

This message goes out to the guys in charge of the FFToday rankings. Wes Welker is listed as the #12 WR this week. In a standard non ppr leagues, Wes Welker has been terrible. He doesn't get a lot of yards and hardly ever scores. His only value belongs in PPR leagues. When your posting rankings like you do and have a guy who's good only in leagues that most people don't play in it makes you look bad. Have you ever thought about doing two rankings to reflect PPR leagues and non PPR leagues to show the difference in value between the two? In a non PPR league Wes Welker is no where near going to be the 12th best WR in the league this or any week for that matter. On the season in a non PPR league with standard scoring of 1 point per 10 yards and 6 per TD he's scored:

 

Week 1 - 5

Week 2 - 7

Week 3 - 5

Week 5 - 7

Week 6 - 7

Week 7 - 13

Week 8 - 7

Week 9 - 3

Week 10 - 10

 

That's terrible. Why do you reflect rankings like this for players who aren't going to be ranked that high ever? What's the deal here?

 

[chidoy 0]

OP won't be back to this topic for a while huh? He don't like crow

[De Novo 0]

OP won't be back to this topic for a while huh? He don't like crow

It was only 10 points. How is the OP eating crow? 10 points isn't going to be good enough for 12th. It probably won't get him in the top 20. I think that validates the OP.

[Connorsdad 38]

Yo Moviedude are you stupid projections are just a guess. Maybe they had a gut feeling about Welker why don't you try to do some projections and see how you do. Trust me it's not easy

Come on dude spit out some projections.

 

 

Goodluck in week 11!!!!!

[IAMWood 6]

Yo boy, eat your crow like a man, what's your problem. Man up and move on, learn some class.

 

[Nomad99 408]

It was only 10 points. How is the OP eating crow? 10 points isn't going to be good enough for 12th. It probably won't get him in the top 20. I think that validates the OP.

 

Because in a non PPR standard scoring league with no 100+ yd bonus 10 pts with no TD IS pretty good

[Kingstowne Dealers 14]

It was only 10 points. How is the OP eating crow? 10 points isn't going to be good enough for 12th. It probably won't get him in the top 20. I think that validates the OP.

 

Actually, according to Week 10's numbers 10 points would qualify for top 16 in my league. Also in week 10 there were only 5 100-yard WR's not named Wes Welker

 

I'll take it.

[De Novo 0]

Because in a non PPR standard scoring league with no 100+ yd bonus 10 pts with no TD IS pretty good

I'm not saying it isn't good. But 50 yards and a TD is better. And I still don't see how the OP is eating crow. Welker got 10 points, which I don't think will be good for 12th this week. Not saying it was a bad ranking, but not sure why the OP should be eating crow. It's not like Welker put up 20 points, and the OP's reasoning was spot-on. In non-PPR leagues, 10 points is the 2nd or 3rd highest output Welker's had this year.

[Nomad99 408]

I'm not saying it isn't good. But 50 yards and a TD is better. And I still don't see how the OP is eating crow. Welker got 10 points, which I don't think will be good for 12th this week. Not saying it was a bad ranking, but not sure why the OP should be eating crow. It's not like Welker put up 20 points, and the OP's reasoning was spot-on. In non-PPR leagues, 10 points is the 2nd or 3rd highest output Welker's had this year.

 

Yes 50 yds & a TD is better......1 pts better(50 yds+6=11)....But if you are looking at it that way, Welker has just as much chance to catch a TD as any WR that you could expect to get 50 yds out of. The fact that he only has 1 TD should not come into play when making your lineup decision because he should have more.......& is more likely to score in the few remaining games than not score. The original poster's argument however was Welkers ranking.....assuming whomever ranked him felt that he would score, given his production.....that ranking was spot on(+6 for TD=16pts)........& for PPR leaguer's the yardage bonus, 7rec & 108yds yielded #1WR #'s............SO the original poster was off base with his tirade.......and by the looks of it does not like Crow.

[De Novo 0]

Yes 50 yds & a TD is better......1 pts better(50 yds+6=11)

It's still better.

 

....But if you are looking at it that way, Welker has just as much chance to catch a TD as any WR that you could expect to get 50 yds out of.

Wrong. Touchdowns are not random. There's a reason some receivers consistently score more TDs than other receivers.

 

The fact that he only has 1 TD should not come into play when making your lineup decision because he should have more.......& is more likely to score in the few remaining games than not score.

The fact he has only 1 TD in an offense that throws to a slew of players in the red zone, and plays opposite Randy Moss, does not come into play? Riiiiight.

 

assuming whomever ranked him felt that he would score, given his production.....that ranking was spot on(+6 for TD=16pts)

But he didn't score. Not saying it was a bad ranking but, again, the OP wasn't wrong.

[krizay 0]

It's still better.

Wrong. Touchdowns are not random. There's a reason some receivers consistently score more TDs than other receivers.

The fact he has only 1 TD in an offense that throws to a slew of players in the red zone, and plays opposite Randy Moss, does not come into play? Riiiiight.

But he didn't score. Not saying it was a bad ranking but, again, the OP wasn't wrong.

 

 

I agree with you and the OP. At this stage in the year HE SHOULD NOT be projected to score a TD. Thus HE SHOULD NEVER be projected in the top 12 as the OP stated! (even though he was ranked 13th)