FFdemon 0 Posted October 19, 2012 Arian Foster and Tannehil for Cam and Mikel Leshoure. Tannehill owner promptly dropped Tannehill for Bradford. Foster team becomes: Sam Bradford Antonio Brown Mike Williams Marshawn Lynch Arian Foster Vernon Davis Steven Jackson Eric Decker Philip Rivers Julio Jones Owen Daniels James Starks Cam team becomes: Cam Newton Kendall Wright Darrius Heyward-Bey Frank Gore Mikel LeShoure Brandon Pettigrew Danny Woodhead Matt Schaub Jermaine Gresham Willis McGahee Malcom Floyd Dwayne Bowe As commish I'm letting it go thru because voting is lame but people are biatching already. Thoughts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Giants Fan 85 Posted October 19, 2012 If you are not absolutely sure it is collusion .... You should veto, just in case. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
n_omarley 11 Posted October 19, 2012 I get thrown off when people list WRs before RBs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GridironGuzzlers 3 Posted October 19, 2012 So a couple teams in your league made a trade to try to improve their teams. If everyone is bitching about that then you should just ban all trades Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FFdemon 0 Posted October 19, 2012 Not everyone just a few. Just wanted an opinion on how bad the trade was. It's standing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BarackOdrama 0 Posted October 19, 2012 Not sure what the Foster owner was thinking. It's not like he's incredibly deep at RB. No way Cam makes that team any better than it was before the trade. Bad trade but if both owners agree and it's not obviously collusive, it stands. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheUsualSuspect 207 Posted October 20, 2012 O yeah, it is certainly a bad trade BUT not one you can veto. By looking at the rosters, I am guessing a 14- team league? Even so, why the fock are players like Tannehill and James Starks on rosters? That's Disgusting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FFdemon 0 Posted October 20, 2012 Lol. It's a 12 team league and yes it's ugly in there. Well folks seemed to have calmed down. The new cam owner is getting a lot of sh!t on the board for how bad the trade was.Kinda feel bad for the guy now. Too bad I'm playing the foster owner this week... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GridironGuzzlers 3 Posted October 20, 2012 We truly won't know if it was a bad trade until the end of the season Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,652 Posted October 20, 2012 WHAT. DID. YOU. DO? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Serpent 51 Posted October 20, 2012 Looks lopsided but not lopsided enough to veto, unless you can get a super majority that vote for a veto. You said it's not everybody complaining and only a "few." If it's a 12 team league and 3 people are complaining, obviously don't veto it. But a 12 team league where 8 people, or even 6 people besides you and the people involved in the trade are very against the trade, I'd veto there. I agree I am generally against voting for veto, but you already let the trade through and it's a special case. As commish it's ultimately your decision however, and that's why in another thread I had zero issues with someone throwing a commish beer money for having to make these types of decisions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lguero1 4 Posted October 21, 2012 Have a sit down with all of the owners. Walk around the table with a Louisville Slugger and ask some questions. Why? What is your logic? If you do not like the answers, as the Commish, you can legally bash his head in with the bat. No judge will even make you sit a minute in jail. Maybe he doesn't like the amount of touches Arian is getting and wants to trade him before he gets hurt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SNZ11 5 Posted October 21, 2012 You let it go, no reason to deny this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheUsualSuspect 207 Posted October 21, 2012 Have a sit down with all of the owners. Walk around the table with a Louisville Slugger and ask some questions. Why? What is your logic? If you do not like the answers, as the Commish, you can legally bash his head in with the bat. No judge will even make you sit a minute in jail. Maybe he doesn't like the amount of touches Arian is getting and wants to trade him before he gets hurt. Would wife and kids be invited to this sit down? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BTL99 34 Posted October 21, 2012 If you are not absolutely sure it is collusion .... You should veto, just in case. hahaha..no ######....that is great! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
