Kopy 572 Posted April 20, 2016 Its just my opinion, but the hype around next years class is the amount of potential game breakers out there. If a couple guys get hurt, a couple more stay in school for another year. Some have difficult seasons and flaws in their game get exposed. There will still be another dozen kids that are gonna be huge. It's the sheer number of kids next year that are making it a much more exciting draft class than most years, and certainly this year. Unless you fall in love with a certain player, just going with a vbd draft strategy. There won't be a bad, or weak spot to draft in that whole first round rookie draft next year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,270 Posted April 20, 2016 I find we are thinking alike quite a bit lately. It seems like it started out as................"The 2016 class is a little on the weak side, could be a good idea to sell later 1sts for 2017 1sts since there are some nice talents scheduled to come out". That was solid thinking IMO, though I could almost say the same thing many years, if you can afford it, sell your later 1sts in the hopes of landing a higher pick the following year........ the weak class is just icing. It then became sell any 2016 1st, save the 1.01/1.02, for 2017 1sts....................now it seems to be a gold rush for 2017 picks that includes proven players. Hit me up if you're that hot for the 2017 picks. Rawls is an interesting case, he flashed about as much as one could hope and the potential situation is about as strong as one could hope (minus the questionable OL which hasn't seemed to stop he or Lynch previously from FF success). Early off-season there were some people paying a lot in trade for T.R., then it tailed off, now I think the guys who think they are smart are selling before the Hawks draft another RB potentially very high. Seattle IS going to have another RB, its what they do, no matter if they are 100% sold on Rawls or not............. and even if there was not an injury. The other RB (rookie or perhaps Foster?) will keep Rawls value in flux, until we see Rawls is the lead back but I doubt I'd trade him for a generic picks in a class a season out. That's a year from knowing exactly what the crop is like, a year of time value, and not knowing draft slot number. He'd have to be like my RB4 or something, and even then...... So you are saying that you laugh at all of my moves in Dyno? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lesjroza 70 Posted April 20, 2016 So you are saying that you laugh at all of my moves in Dyno? I don't get it.................I guess when MFL is back up I'll take a look and maybe put it together. Did you trade for a bunch of 2017 picks? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,270 Posted April 20, 2016 I don't get it.................I guess when MFL is back up I'll take a look and maybe put it together. Did you trade for a bunch of 2017 picks? Nvm. I traded for 2 is all. I was in no way being serious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites