jrokh 574 Posted September 21, 2016 Should I start Mckinnon at Carolina or Jeremy Hill at home vs Denver. Neither is a great option so which one is less bad? Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray_T 608 Posted September 22, 2016 I agree, Hill. Neither has a good matchup, but Hill is the better talent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimaveli 119 Posted September 22, 2016 I'm scurred but Hill is due. And we need to see the Vikes play with time to wrap their mind around the whole 'AP is out foreva' issue before we can be too sure about anything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrBurns 3 Posted September 22, 2016 I don't see either doing much, but Hill has a much better chance of scoring a TD. Being a Vikings fan, I can say that their O-line is playing terribly so far. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lake209 34 Posted September 24, 2016 Thanks for mine. If you play 1 pt PPR, I'd actually try out McKinnon. Standard = Hill. I agree with the group here, Hill is far more likely to score a TD...one would think Asiata would get the short-yardage job w/Vikings. However, McKinnon might get 4-7 balls thrown his way...should get some good passing yardage. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Byrdman5 104 Posted September 25, 2016 Hill. I want to see how McKinnon is used. They have talked him up as the guy if AP goes down in preseason and now. I just don't believe it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bojangles56 13 Posted September 25, 2016 Hill...he's due and I would like to see main one role before starting him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
