Sore loser Trump setting up for riots after he gets destroyed in election.

[Willis McGahee's Dentist 61]

Still waiting.......

Keep playing stupid (although I realize you might not be playing). He's already preparing for the loss. That's why he's making up lies about it being rigged while never bringing an ounce of proof to the table. Why do you suppose he's trying so desperately to plant that seed in the tiny brains of his supporters? Only losing candidate in this country's history who, instead of accepting defeat, will blame it on a rigged system. He knows the intelligence of his base. He knows exactly what he's trying to promote. He's not quite dumb enough to come out and call for violence. He's going to let the dummies that support him make that choice on their own. Just like he didn't squarely take the blame when that dude punched the protester being escorted out of his rally. That was 100% Trump driven with his earlier comments. Please try to get a little smarter. It's exhausting owning you every time I visit this board.

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

To not even watch the video and form an opinion is the ultimate in deflection and, I gotta think somewhere in that partisan hack head of yours, you know this. Yet you, Newbie's dentist, and Honcho are all somehow claiming victory because of your ignorance. Remarkable.

 

I will watch it if it ever gets actually vetted as a credible thing (given the source...I won't hold my breath).

Why would I first watch something from a guy like O'Keefe? Thats not a deflection. Pointing out that he has selectively edited his pieces before and been put in jail for how he has done things is not deflection...or opinion. Its fact.

A hack is someone who watches that...does not care who produced it or if the guy took liberties in production and believes it anyway...then passes it off as fact.

 

Im not claiming victory...Im claiming that buying into such videos without researching or knowing who put it out there is what stupid uninformed idiots do. The kind Trump rode to the nomination and the kind that are just not there in enough numbers for him to win the presidency.

 

Would is surprise me if Hillary did such things? Not really. Same for anyone on the right. She is sleeze...I have never supported her nor will I ever vote for her.

[Willis McGahee's Dentist 61]

 

It's comical. Conway had him back in the fight, basically by putting a muzzle (aka "shackles" ) on him. Then the debates came around and he had to speak for himself and everyone was reminded "Oh, yeah... this guy is a focking idiot."

He needs shackles and a teleprompter. The debates and his pep rallies are not good for a guy as dumb as him and with his childish temperament.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

Keep playing stupid (although I realize you might not be playing). He's already preparing for the loss. That's why he's making up lies about it being rigged while never bringing an ounce of proof to the table. Why do you suppose he's trying so desperately to plant that seed in the tiny brains of his supporters? Only losing candidate in this country's history who, instead of accepting defeat, will blame it on a rigged system. He knows the intelligence of his base. He knows exactly what he's trying to promote. He's not quite dumb enough to come out and call for violence. He's going to let the dummies that support him make that choice on their own. Just like he didn't squarely take the blame when that dude punched the protester being escorted out of his rally. That was 100% Trump driven with his earlier comments. Please try to get a little smarter. It's exhausting owning you every time I visit this board.

Oh. So he didn't call for violence. Got it. Maybe change the thread title then?

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

John Edwards claimed the election was rigged in 04. So did every democrat I. The country in 2000. Trump is hardly treading on new ground here, despite what newbies dentist has to say. Read your history Orange Anus. That way you'll look less stupider

[Willis McGahee's Dentist 61]

Oh. So he didn't call for violence. Got it. Maybe change the thread title then?

Maybe suck my cack. Again

[Willis McGahee's Dentist 61]

John Edwards claimed the election was rigged in 04. So did every democrat I. The country in 2000. Trump is hardly treading on new ground here, despite what newbies dentist has to say. Read your history Orange Anus. That way you'll look less stupider

LOL Yeah, the hanging chads thingy in Florida was not a good look for the country. But it was an individual circumstance that actually happened. Not some preemptive excuse for getting his ass kicked. Dumb as a box of rocks. No wonder you chose to just be a cop.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

Maybe suck my cack. Again

Victory

[Willis McGahee's Dentist 61]

sore vagine

Fixed it for you, loser

[giraldi02 470]

Don't think it's rigged?

https://d1sb17b1leotpq.cloudfront.net/rigging-election-%E2%80%93-video-ii-mass-voter-fraud.html

[Willis McGahee's Dentist 61]

If anyone had the ability to 'rig' an election, Donald Trump would have never won the GOP nomination. The people in charge of the party despise him. And if Hillary had the power to rig an election, why was she beaten by a relative unknown like Obama in 2008? No one ever brings actual logic into the equation when coming up with their fantasy scenarios. Trump is well known for not being able to accept defeat. He's already laid the groundwork for when and if he loses his Trump University case. The judge is Mexican. That is the Trump way. Just another example of how he has an elementary child's mentality. Like a spoiled child on a playground crying "He cheated" when he loses in dodgeball.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Don't think it's rigged?

 

https://d1sb17b1leotpq.cloudfront.net/rigging-election-%E2%80%93-video-ii-mass-voter-fraud.html

 

Another O'Keefe piece...you go girl.

[drobeski 3,061]

 

Another O'Keefe piece...you go girl.

another schill choosing to stay uninformed, you go corky

[giraldi02 470]

 

Another O'Keefe piece...you go girl.

You realize that his first video got that guy fired already right? Why fire someone for a conspiracy theory?

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

So that Foval guy in the video isn't saying that stuff? Unless my eyes and ears are lying, it sure looks like he's saying it, and leaves no doubt about context. Dummy talks too much to claim "out of context"

[giraldi02 470]

So that Foval guy in the video isn't saying that stuff? Unless my eyes and ears are lying, it sure looks like he's saying it, and leaves no doubt about context. Dummy talks too much to claim "out of context"

It was a Russian clone

[Willis McGahee's Dentist 61]

So that Foval guy in the video isn't saying that stuff? Unless my eyes and ears are lying, it sure looks like he's saying it, and leaves no doubt about context. Dummy talks too much to claim "out of context"

I can say stuff on a video too. So can you.

[giraldi02 470]

I can say stuff on a video too. So can you.

So can Trump by that standard...no?

[Sho Nuff 719]

another schill choosing to stay uninformed, you go corky

 

 

You realize that his first video got that guy fired already right? Why fire someone for a conspiracy theory?

 

A guy being fired is not proof that the piece was 100% on point or credible. HTH.

And always good when drobs thinks someone else is a schill for not believing a slanted activist who has been busted for editing crap.

Again...wait a bit and see if this stuff gets vetted before just believing it and passing it off as fact as you all like to do.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

I can say stuff on a video too. So can you.

This woukd be the equal of defending Trump about his puzzy grab comments without actually listening to it. Lib-bots are attacking this without watching it. Funny. Fockin clowns

[giraldi02 470]

 

Again...wait a bit and see if this stuff gets vetted before just believing it and passing it off as fact as you all like to do.

But it's ok to assume the context of Trump's video without hearing the entirety of THAT conversation?

 

I'm not trying to deflect this conversation to being about Trump. But you have to understand where his supporters are going to go with these types of responses right?

[Sho Nuff 719]

But it's ok to assume the context of Trump's video without hearing the entirety of THAT conversation?

 

I'm not trying to deflect this conversation to being about Trump. But you have to understand where his supporters are going to go with these types of responses right?

 

Context of Trump? He focking admitted it...WTF are you even talking about?

Good lord you are reaching with that one.

[giraldi02 470]

 

Context of Trump? He focking admitted it...WTF are you even talking about?

Good lord you are reaching with that one.

Hate to tell you this...but Scott Foval kinda sorted admitted that he and his ilk were rigging elections. I don't care whether three days worth of video was edited out. The dude, on camera, says what they do to rig elections.

[Willis McGahee's Dentist 61]

So can Trump by that standard...no?

Oh, he actually did. To Billy Bush

[Willis McGahee's Dentist 61]

Hate to tell you this...but Scott Foval kinda sorted admitted that he and his ilk were rigging elections. I don't care whether three days worth of video was edited out. The dude, on camera, says what they do to rig elections.

There have been 31 cases of known voter fraud in the last 20 years. Heard it on the radio this morning. Out of billions of votes. That's not rigging an election.

[giraldi02 470]

There have been 31 cases of known voter fraud in the last 20 years. Heard it on the radio this morning. Out of billions of votes. That's not rigging an election.

So bussing in people from a different state is acceptable to you? Because that's precisely what that guy talked about.

 

How is that NOT the very definition of voter fraud?

[Willis McGahee's Dentist 61]

So bussing in people from a different state is acceptable to you? Because that's precisely what that guy talked about.

 

How is that NOT the very definition of voter fraud?

31 cases. Maybe that's one of them. I don't know. Again, who is doing this 'rigging'? If you're talking about an individual who shouldn't be voting, finding a way to vote, then I have no doubt that happens. It's the idea that the government is rigging the election that's pure horse sh!t.

[listen2me 23 1,542]

All the pubs had to do is trot out any normal ned to win this election.

 

Instead they came with trump.

[Sho Nuff 719]

All the pubs had to do is trot out any normal ned to win this election.

 

Instead they came with trump.

 

I would have loved to have seen Kasich/Rubio on the ticket together. Or Paul with anyone reasonable.

Hell...its bad when even Jeb! looks good compared to this crapfest of an election.

[giraldi02 470]

31 cases. Maybe that's one of them. I don't know. Again, who is doing this 'rigging'? If you're talking about an individual who shouldn't be voting, finding a way to vote, then I have no doubt that happens. It's the idea that the government is rigging the election that's pure horse sh!t.

Perhaps it depends on one's definition of "government".

 

I consider political parties government, regardless of whether their candidates win in an election.

 

I consider Super PACs to be more government than local government. They influence decision making more than you or I.

 

So to that extent, when a group like Americans United is exposed for this kind of behavior, I tend to follow the money upwards.

 

Robert Creamer, the guy mentioned in this video, committed $2.3 million in bank fraud in the 1990's. His wife is an Illinois Democratic Representative in the 9th congressional district (Jan Schakowsky).

Oh...and in case anyone wanted to know...

 

Bob Creamer was a political consultant to the Democratic National Committee helping with Barack Obama on his two presidential campaigns. He also wanted Democrats to back nuclear deals with Iran.

 

So, that's government in my eyes.

[drobeski 3,061]

There have been 31 cases of known voter fraud in the last 20 years. Heard it on the radio this morning. Out of billions of votes. That's not rigging an election.

So if the cops issues 200 speeding tickets in one given year, that means only 200 people went over the speed limit ?

 

 

[Willis McGahee's Dentist 61]

So if the cops issues 200 speeding tickets in one given year, that means only 200 people went over the speed limit ?

 

 

So if only 9 women report they were sexually assaulted by Trump, that means he only groped nine women?

 

See, I can play make believe too, fatso.

[giraldi02 470]

Perhaps it depends on one's definition of "government".

 

I consider political parties government, regardless of whether their candidates win in an election.

 

I consider Super PACs to be more government than local government. They influence decision making more than you or I.

 

So to that extent, when a group like Americans United is exposed for this kind of behavior, I tend to follow the money upwards.

 

Robert Creamer, the guy mentioned in this video, committed $2.3 million in bank fraud in the 1990's. His wife is an Illinois Democratic Representative in the 9th congressional district (Jan Schakowsky).

Oh...and in case anyone wanted to know...

 

Bob Creamer was a political consultant to the Democratic National Committee helping with Barack Obama on his two presidential campaigns. He also wanted Democrats to back nuclear deals with Iran.

 

So, that's government in my eyes.

Oh...and to boot:

 

Bob Creamer writes for Huffington Post.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/robert-creamer

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

Oh...and to boot:

 

Bob Creamer writes for Huffington Post.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/robert-creamer

The veil is off. And yet lib-bots will still deny.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

 

 

 

A guy being fired is not proof that the piece was 100% on point or credible. HTH.

And always good when drobs thinks someone else is a schill for not believing a slanted activist who has been busted for editing crap.

Again...wait a bit and see if this stuff gets vetted before just believing it and passing it off as fact as you all like to do.

Troll

[jerryskids 5,206]

 

 

 

A guy being fired is not proof that the piece was 100% on point or credible. HTH.

And always good when drobs thinks someone else is a schill for not believing a slanted activist who has been busted for editing crap.

Again...wait a bit and see if this stuff gets vetted before just believing it and passing it off as fact as you all like to do.

Vetted by whom, the MSM? They are going to avoid this as much as possible. Maybe roll out another victim of Trump as pablum for you and their other mindless followers.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

Vetted by whom, the MSM? They are going to avoid this as much as possible. Maybe roll out another victim of Trump as pablum for you and their other mindless followers.

Ecacy. Who vetted that ugly broad from the plane, who is obviously full of shite? They are childlike, Lib-bots like Slownuff. It's as if they never read what they write.

[kutulu 1,547]

Best riots ever

[Sho Nuff 719]

Vetted by whom, the MSM? They are going to avoid this as much as possible. Maybe roll out another victim of Trump as pablum for you and their other mindless followers.

They are all avoiding for the same reason i have stated. Even fox isnt really touching this. Mindless would be accepting Okeefe without it being verified by anyone.

[mobb_deep 917]

To quote the donk himself... Hillary could stand in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot somebody, and I'd still vote for her over Trump.

 

He's literally that focking bad. Good job republitards.

 

And if I'm a hack for not supporting a giant focking baby with absolutely zero clue how to govern then guilty as charged. Proudly never Trump.