Think the media isn't biased?

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

Show me an example where Fox is showing a bias and I'll admit it.

Wow...just wow.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Wow...just wow.

 

 

Just one example

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

 

Just one example

Your own conservative posters on here admit it...Fock man. Get a grip.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Your own conservative posters on here admit it...Fock man. Get a grip.

 

I won't apologize for them.

 

Just one example man. If it's so obvious, it shouldn't be hard to find proof.

[cyclone24 1,935]

I won't apologize for them.

 

Just one example man. If it's so obvious, it shouldn't be hard to find proof.

I said earlier....the 5, the chick show at noon, Fox and friends....all heavily anti liberal shows. Come on. I'm republican and I'm not arguing this.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

I said earlier....the 5, the chick show at noon, Fox and friends....all heavily anti liberal shows. Come on. I'm republican and I'm not arguing this.

 

I'm not taking "watch this chick or this one" Show a link to a story where it's clearly right leaning and I'll relent.

[cyclone24 1,935]

I'm not taking "watch this chick or this one" Show a link to a story where it's clearly right leaning and I'll relent.

 

Christ...do your own research.

 

You're either being stupid or trolling...either way I don't care enough to convince you. It's biased...you'd have to be pretty obtuse not to recognize it.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Christ...do your own research.

 

You're either being stupid or trolling...either way I don't care enough to convince you. It's biased...you'd have to be pretty obtuse not to recognize it.

 

Not stupid or trolling.

 

Anytime one of these liberal focktards come to a thread it's ALWAYS "link?" or "care to provide proof". Fock em..........show me a link. I've already shown an example of the majority of the media leaning left.

[cyclone24 1,935]

 

Not stupid or trolling.

 

Anytime one of these liberal focktards come to a thread it's ALWAYS "link?" or "care to provide proof". Fock em..........show me a link. I've already shown an example of the majority of the media leaning left.

Its like the left. Its not what you show but what you dont show that leans a certain way.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Its like the left. Its not what you show but what you dont show that leans a certain way.

I showed where CBS manufactured news, saying it was 4 white teens beating a black handicap person while yelling Trump over and over.

 

It shouldn't be too hard for them to show proof of Fox's bias.

[cyclone24 1,935]

I showed where CBS manufactured news, saying it was 4 white teens beating a black handicap person while yelling Trump over and over.

 

It shouldn't be too hard for them to show proof of Fox's bias.

Manaufacturing false news and bias in reporting are not the same thing.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

I showed where CBS manufactured news, saying it was 4 white teens beating a black handicap person while yelling Trump over and over.

 

It shouldn't be too hard for them to show proof of Fox's bias.

Not actually what the the report even said. And that was one guy in CBS radio.

Fock you are mental.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Manaufacturing false news and bias in reporting are not the same thing.

 

Manufacturing news is showing a bias...........

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Not actually what the the report even said. And that was one guy in CBS radio.

Fock you are mental.

 

That's what the video showed.........fock you are dense.

 

Just one example.........................fo' Sho'

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

That's what the video showed.........fock you are dense.

 

Just one example.........................fo' Sho'

Watched it and red accounts about what was said about CBS radio. It didn't happen exactly as you just said. It implies things like that...but didn't come out and say just that.

Never said they were white as you claimed.

 

And the guy going on about the n word is a gigantic doosh too

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Watched it and red accounts about what was said about CBS radio. It didn't happen exactly as you just said. It implies things like that...but didn't come out and say just that.

Never said they were white as you claimed.

 

And the guy going on about the n word is a gigantic doosh too

 

Right; implied it even where a liberal could pick up on it.

 

So, I'll be standing by waiting for someone to post a link showing the clear bias of Fox to the right. Merely correcting the mainstream media on their left leaning stance doesn't cut it.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

Right; implied it even where a liberal could pick up on it.

 

So, I'll be standing by waiting for someone to post a link showing the clear bias of Fox to the right. Merely correcting the mainstream media on their left leaning stance doesn't cut it.

You claimed something different that I disagreed with dumbass. Fock...you have continued to look dumb between this and pizza gate.

[Reality 3,121]

 

He's not the one who claimed a national news org sued to be able to lie to viewers.

 

HTH

Leave him be, dudes on a roll.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

You claimed something different that I disagreed with dumbass. Fock...you have continued to look dumb between this and pizza gate.

 

No, I said they manufactured the news and they did.

 

Just stick with your talking points snowflake and stay away from the truth.

[cyclone24 1,935]

No, I said they manufactured the news and they did.

 

Just stick with your talking points snowflake and stay away from the truth.

 

JFC manufacturing false news is not the same as bias.

 

If fox doesn't cover DNC speeches, or is critical of democrats that do speeches at a convention....but then cover every republican speech....THAT is bias.

If they say the democrats in speeches they didn't cover said they would take away our guns immediately.....THAT is manufacturing news.

 

These two are not nearly the same.

[cbfalcon 827]

 

Not stupid or trolling.

 

Anytime one of these liberal focktards come to a thread it's ALWAYS "link?" or "care to provide proof". Fock em..........show me a link. I've already shown an example of the majority of the media leaning left.

I recall this story awhile back making me think Fox may have some bias and ethical issues.

 

Fox News is deep in an ethics quagmire following a Washington Post report that the network's CEO Roger Ailes used Fox News analyst K.T. McFarland to try to recruit Gen. David Petraeus to run for the president as a Republican. While Ailes and McFarland made their secret overtures, McFarland appeared on Fox's airwaves to praise Petraeus as "one of the greatest generals in American history."

 

According to The Washington Post's Bob Woodward, Ailes had McFarland advise Petraeus that he "should turn down an expected offer from President Obama to become CIA director" and instead hold out for the chairmanship of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and to resign and run for president if he was not offered that post. In audio of the meeting obtained by Woodward, Petraeus also said to McFarland that he had been advised that Ailes might resign as Fox News chief and act as a Petraeus aide should the general run for president. He also said that Ailes might bankroll the campaign, although he added that maybe it was News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch who had made that offer.

 

Woodward also reported that Ailes has acknowledged that he did ask McFarland to make the pitch: "It was more of a joke, a wiseass way I have." Ailes also called McFarland "way out of line" in some of her comments.

 

This would be an ethical problem by itself: Ailes -- the chief of a supposedly objective news network -- was advising an active general who was commanding U.S. troops in the middle of a war to make demands of the president, and if those demands were not met, to run for president with Ailes acting as his aide.

 

But the ethics problem is much worse than that. McFarland appeared on Fox's airwaves soon after meeting with Petraeus to praise him as "one of the greatest generals in American history" who will save us from defeat in Afghanistan. While McFarland was putting Petraeus on at least the same level as Ulysses S. Grant, George Washington, Andrew Jackson, and Dwight Eisenhower, she provided no disclosure of her and Ailes' advice that Petraeus should consider running for president.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/12/04/fox-analyst-praised-petraeus-on-the-air-while-p/191665

 

I know nothing about mediamatters.org. Maybe they are full of it. But google it and you'll find plenty of stories.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

JFC manufacturing false news is not the same as bias.

 

If fox doesn't cover DNC speeches, or is critical of democrats that do speeches at a convention....but then cover every republican speech....THAT is bias.

If they say the democrats in speeches they didn't cover said they would take away our guns immediately.....THAT is manufacturing news.

 

These two are not nearly the same.

 

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bias

 

Bias definition #10 (as a verb) to cause to hold or exhibit a particular bias; to influence, especially unfairly: a tearful plea designed to bias the jury;

 

When you manufacture a news story to influence, especially unfairly that IS BIAS.

 

Class dismissed.

[cyclone24 1,935]

 

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bias

 

Bias definition #10 (as a verb) to cause to hold or exhibit a particular bias; to influence, especially unfairly: a tearful plea designed to bias the jury;

 

When you manufacture a news story to influence, especially unfairly that IS BIAS.

 

Class dismissed.

Yeah youre not teaching anyone anything chief.

 

Bias is not lying. Sorry you cant grasp this.

[cbfalcon 827]

 

 

Just one example

I felt Fox was biased when they published an opinion article explaining that Newt Gingrich's infidelities actually made him a much more amazing candidate than someone loyal. It just FELT biased.

 

I want to be coldly analytical, not moralize, here. I want to tell you what Mr. Gingrichs behavior could mean for the country, not for the future of his current marriage. So, heres what one interested in making America stronger can reasonably concludepsychologicallyfrom Mr. Gingrichs behavior during his three marriages:

 

1) Three women have met Mr. Gingrich and been so moved by his emotional energy and intellect that they decided they wanted to spend the rest of their lives with him.

 

2) Two of these women felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married.

 

3 ) One of them felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married for the second time, was not exactly her equal in the looks department and had a wife (Marianne) who wanted to make his life without her as painful as possible.

 

Conclusion: When three women want to sign on for life with a man who is now running for president, I worry more about whether well be clamoring for a third Gingrich term, not whether well want to let him go after one.

 

4) Two womenMr. Gingrichs first two wiveshave sat down with him while he delivered to them incredibly painful truths: that he no longer loved them as he did before, that he had fallen in love with other women and that he needed to follow his heart, despite the great price he would pay financially and the risk he would be taking with his reputation.

 

Conclusion: I can only hope Mr. Gingrich will be as direct and unsparing with the Congress, the American people and our allies. If this nation must now move with conviction in the direction of its heart, Newt Gingrich is obviously no stranger to that journey.

 

5) Mr. Gingrichs daughters from his first marriage are among his most vigorous supporters. They obviously adore him and respect him and feel grateful for the kind of father he was.

 

When I want to know who in a marriage (or, for that matter, a series of marriages) is the one who actually was aligned with their best interests, I never dismiss evidence of who the children gravitate toward and admire. In this case, they have judged the father who left their family, then remarried twice. And they judge him 10 out of 10. I only hope my own children love me and respect me as much when they are adults.

 

So, as far as I can tell, judging from the psychological data, we have only one real risk to America from his marital history if Newt Gingrich were to become president: We would need to worry that another nation, perhaps a little younger than ours, would be so taken by Mr. Gingrich that it would seduce him into marrying it and becoming its president. And I think that is exceedingly unlikely.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/01/20/newt-gingrichs-three-marriages-mean-might-make-strong-president-really.amp.html?client=safari

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

I recall this story awhile back making me think Fox may have some bias and ethical issues.

 

 

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/12/04/fox-analyst-praised-petraeus-on-the-air-while-p/191665

 

I know nothing about mediamatters.org. Maybe they are full of it. But google it and you'll find plenty of stories.

 

That is biased I agree. Is it an example of them broadcasting the news in a biased way? No but biased all the same.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Yeah youre not teaching anyone anything chief.

 

Bias is not lying. Sorry you cant grasp this.

 

Sorry you can't read. What part of that definition and explanation do you need help with?

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

No, I said they manufactured the news and they did.

 

Just stick with your talking points snowflake and stay away from the truth.

"I showed where CBS manufactured news, saying it was 4 white teens beating a black handicap person while yelling Trump over and over."

 

Your post...but the report never said 4 white..,you did manufacture things to play along with your own talking points about media bias.

 

Fock you are dense

[cyclone24 1,935]

 

Sorry you can't read. What part of that definition and explanation do you need help with?

Lets slow things down for you.

 

If a station claims 4 white people beat up a handicap man....that is manufacturing news. It didnt happen, its false and didnt occur.

If a station says 4 black kids beat up a white kid but then proceed to excuse it by saying trump created this culture, how its not a hate crime, etc....that is bias.

 

If you cant tell the difference youre a moron.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

"I showed where CBS manufactured news, saying it was 4 white teens beating a black handicap person while yelling Trump over and over."

 

Your post...but the report never said 4 white..,you did manufacture things to play along with your own talking points about media bias.

 

Fock you are dense

 

I apologize.

 

They never said white but implied that by saying they kept calling the handicap person the N word while shouting Trump.

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

I apologize.

 

They never said white but implied that by saying they kept calling the handicap person the N word while shouting Trump.

So...pretty much what I said above and then you argued with me for several posts.

Good job

[cbfalcon 827]

By the way, I salute Fox's bias. They saw a spot in the market in which demand was outpacing supply, and they jumped on it. .....Sure, it would be nice if these corporations felt a responsibility beyond their bottom line, but sex sells. If the other networks are selling sex and you refuse to do the same, you won't stay in business very long.

 

Now most people don't actually care enough to do what's necessary to have a more informed opinion. They just want to bust their nut. But if anyone does actually aspire to be better informed, the only solution is to view both biased sides version equally. Or in truth, maybe the solution is to view the biased side you don't agree with's version about 75% of the time.

[cbfalcon 827]

 

That is biased I agree. Is it an example of them broadcasting the news in a biased way? No but biased all the same.

Didn't the article point out that Mcfartface was on the air broadcasting praise for Petreus at the direction of management? Broadcasting counts as broadcasting, no?

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Lets slow things down for you.

 

If a station claims 4 white people beat up a handicap man....that is manufacturing news. It didnt happen, its false and didnt occur.

If a station says 4 black kids beat up a white kid but then proceed to excuse it by saying trump created this culture, how its not a hate crime, etc....that is bias.

 

If you cant tell the difference youre a moron.

 

I agree your example is bias however, when you imply (or make stuff up) to influence your audience that is bias. If you can't read that definition and see that, you're the moron.

 

Another site definition to help you comprehend it. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/bias

 

"These verbs mean to influence in a particular, often unfavorable way. To bias is to cause to incline toward or away from something or someone: claimed that the ruling was biased against low-income workers; was biased by experience in favor of stronger regulation."

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

So...pretty much what I said above and then you argued with me for several posts.

Good job

 

I apologized.

 

That being said, so you agree they implied it was whites that did it and thereby tried to influence their audience i.e. biased?

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

I apologized.

 

That being said, so you agree they implied it was whites that did it and thereby tried to influence their audience i.e. biased?

I already said they implied it...damn you are slow.

Was that report biased...yes.

Never said otherwise

[cyclone24 1,935]

 

I agree your example is bias however, when you imply (or make stuff up) to influence your audience that is bias. If you can't read that definition and see that, you're the moron.

 

Another site definition to help you comprehend it. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/bias

 

"These verbs mean to influence in a particular, often unfavorable way. To bias is to cause to incline toward or away from something or someone: claimed that the ruling was biased against low-income workers; was biased by experience in favor of stronger regulation."

Hmm...I guess to an extent.

 

But one is obviously more....malicious? Intentionally dishonest? than the other dont you think?

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Hmm...I guess to an extent.

 

But one is obviously more....malicious? Intentionally dishonest? than the other dont you think?

 

I agree one is more malicious however as you or someone else pointed out earlier, omitting the news can be just as bad or worse.

 

Several assaults by blacks on whites that are CLEARLY hate crimes go unreported by the mainstream media.

 

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/08/wrong-hood-btch-couple-stomps-on-girl-for-being-in-wrong-neighborhood-video/ From a year ago but I don't recall seeing anyone cover this.

[penultimatestraw 473]

No?

 

 

But I really can't tolerate the political pundits broadcasting these "stories". Guys like Crowder immediately loose credibility with their in-your-face, angry style, as their emotion make me think they aren't rational. At least have the decency to parade some hot chick co-host to distract me while you go on your tirade.

[cyclone24 1,935]

I agree one is more malicious however as you or someone else pointed out earlier, omitting the news can be just as bad or worse.

 

Several assaults by blacks on whites that are CLEARLY hate crimes go unreported by the mainstream media.

 

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/08/wrong-hood-btch-couple-stomps-on-girl-for-being-in-wrong-neighborhood-video/ From a year ago but I don't recall seeing anyone cover this.

Agreed......but that's not manufacturing false news. Under reporting...or selectively reporting maybe,

[Baker Boy 1,710]

This is one of my favorites from MSNBC

 

The segment took this approach to a key part of the dispatcher call:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black.

 

Here’s how the actual conversation went down:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

Dispatcher: OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?

Zimmerman: He looks black.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/randy-hall/2012/03/30/msnbc-fixes-false-report-which-made-zimmerman-look-racist-doesnt