drobeski 3,061 Posted May 16, 2017 You have it completely backwards as usual. Seth story was the deflection...they are again trying to put out the dumpster fire Trump has set. CNN and WaPo story continues to be confirmed even by McMasters...Seth Rich story that came out gets flaws pointed out as more comes out. Ooof.... um nope, Seth story was yesterday afternoon. Wrong again, leach. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 16, 2017 um nope, Seth story was yesterday afternoon. Wrong again, leach. Psst...because they knew the other story was coming out (they were asked to comment) Wrong again troll. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 16, 2017 Seth Rich story that came out gets flaws pointed out as more comes out. So it's untrue that emails connect Seth Rich and Wikileaks? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 470 Posted May 16, 2017 So the story is automatically not true? I guess we can put the Russian Hacking DNC story to bed since the DNC paid CrowdStrike to investigate. When did I say it wasn't true? I'm of the firm belief that Rich was killed by nefarious means. I stated this during the lead up to the election. I firmly believe he was a leaker to Wikileaks. However, the integrity of sources is paramount to the legitimacy. This investigator is nothing more than a shill with an agenda. That hurts the credibility of actually discovering what happened to this guy and whether the DNC or Clintons were involved. If one is going to call one side out for using questionable sources, one should be willing to do the same when the intended target is from the opposite side. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 16, 2017 So it's untrue that emails connect Seth Rich and Wikileaks? It's not confirmed by any named sources inside. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 16, 2017 It's not confirmed by any named sources inside. How often are sources named? I'll hang up and listen........ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 16, 2017 How often are sources named? I'll hang up and listen........ And away we go with the spin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 16, 2017 An FBI forensic report of Rich's computer -- generated within 96 hours after Rich's murder -- showed he made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, a now-deceased American investigative reporter, documentary filmmaker, and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time, the federal source told Fox News. “I have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks,” the federal investigator told Fox News, confirming the MacFadyen connection. He said the emails are in possession of the FBI, while the stalled case is in the hands of the Washington Police Department. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 16, 2017 The federal investigator, who requested anonymity, said 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments between Democratic National Committee leaders, spanning from January 2015 through late May 2016, were transferred from Rich to MacFadyen before May 21. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 16, 2017 Unnamed supposed investigator tells Fox News...Filthy believes him. Intel Community including now Pompeo say it's Russia...Filthy won't believe them. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 16, 2017 At least there's some investigative work being done as opposed to the I.C. rubber stamping a report commissioned by the DNC. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 16, 2017 At least there's some investigative work being done as opposed to the I.C. rubber stamping a report commissioned by the DNC. Again...your sticking with the falsehood here. The IC did do more than just rely on Crowdstrike for the information in the server. This has been pointed out to you many times. Intel work? Seems we have one guy claiming what was in an email...and that is it. That's even less than what you are claiming the IC did. You should push back from the table son...this isnt going well for you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 16, 2017 Sho Flake still insisting he's winning arguments while getting donkey punched left and right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,958 Posted May 16, 2017 Unnamed supposed investigator tells Fox News...Filthy believes him. Intel Community including now Pompeo say it's Russia...Filthy won't believe them. Popmeo said Russia was trying to influence the election. He didn't say they did the hack and gave it to Wikileaks. Try again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 16, 2017 Sho Flake still insisting he's winning arguments while getting donkey punched left and right. Donkey punched. You have a link from Fox claiming a federal investigator saw the emails. After you first started this thread with an investigator falsely claiming he was working for the Rich family. Yeah...you really got me. The delusion is strong in this guy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 16, 2017 Donkey punched. You have a link from Fox claiming a federal investigator saw the emails. After you first started this thread with an investigator falsely claiming he was working for the Rich family. Yeah...you really got me. The delusion is strong in this guy. tilt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted May 16, 2017 Seriously ShoFlake has to be posting from a mental institution. His wife had to commit him. He's focking nuts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 16, 2017 tilt And you there the cap gun (because you are never actually working with anything resembling a weapon from that empty skull of yours) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted May 16, 2017 And you there the cap gun (because you are never actually working with anything resembling a weapon from that empty skull of yours)Holy crap! can anyone interpret this? He must be high as a kite on anti-depressants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 16, 2017 Filthys PI sounds like a great guy... https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2007/rod-wheeler-claims-o%E2%80%99reilly-factor-lesbian-gangs-are-raping-young-girls Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,958 Posted May 16, 2017 Filthys PI sounds like a great guy... https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2007/rod-wheeler-claims-o%E2%80%99reilly-factor-lesbian-gangs-are-raping-young-girls SPLC? Lol. No one cites them anymore. Even Obamas DOJ said they weren't to be used as a source. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 16, 2017 Should Sho's hubby take away his wifi access? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 16, 2017 Should Sho's hubby take away his wifi access? For kicking your ass over and over? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 17, 2017 http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/16/media/seth-rich-family-response-claims-of-wikileaks-contact/index.html But Tuesday afternoon, Wheeler told CNN he had no evidence to suggest Rich had contacted Wikileaks before his death. Wheeler instead said he only learned about the possible existence of such evidence through the reporter he spoke to for the FoxNews.com story. He explained that the comments he made to WTTG-TV were intended to simply preview Fox News' Tuesday story. The WTTG-TV news director did not respond to multiple requests for comment. oops He put the Russian hacking story to bed...oh wait...what? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,682 Posted May 17, 2017 The PI is a former D.C. Homicide detective. It's all conjecture now but writing off the credibility of the PI may be a bit early So, the British spy who outed urinegate is equally credible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,682 Posted May 17, 2017 http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/16/media/seth-rich-family-response-claims-of-wikileaks-contact/index.html oops He put the Russian hacking story to bed...oh wait...what? Woops Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,682 Posted May 17, 2017 Unnamed supposed investigator tells Fox News...Filthy believes him. Intel Community including now Pompeo say it's Russia...Filthy won't believe them. That about sums it up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,682 Posted May 17, 2017 So, the news station refused to comment on their own story? Wow. Yeah that's credible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 17, 2017 http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/16/media/seth-rich-family-response-claims-of-wikileaks-contact/index.html oops He put the Russian hacking story to bed...oh wait...what? CNN? The information about the email exchange between Rich and Wikileaks was from a Federal investigator who requested to remain unnamed. And how many stories have come out from unnamed sources that other media outlets run with that you Libs get all hot and bothered? Most...... Who leaked Flynn, Trump supposedly hanging up on Australian Prime Minister, that Trump leaked classified info to Russian diplomat, etc? Did you trust those unnamed sources? Yep.......... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 17, 2017 So we're back to: 1. Why did this robber not take his valuables? 2. How many other investigations did Wikileaks offer rewards in? 3. Why did the DNC not allow 1 single person from the Federal Gov. to examine the hacked equipment? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 17, 2017 CNN? The information about the email exchange between Rich and Wikileaks was from a Federal investigator who requested to remain unnamed. And how many stories have come out from unnamed sources that other media outlets run with that you Libs get all hot and bothered? Most...... Who leaked Flynn, Trump supposedly hanging up on Australian Prime Minister, that Trump leaked classified info to Russian diplomat, etc? Did you trust those unnamed sources? Yep.......... The whole premise of this thread was built off BS and hereyiu go with spin and deflect. Psst...the Trump telling the Russians stuff is another thread and has been confirmed. Flynn info confirmed. Back away man...you're done Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 17, 2017 So we're back to: 1. Why did this robber not take his valuables? 2. How many other investigations did Wikileaks offer rewards in? 3. Why did the DNC not allow 1 single person from the Federal Gov. to examine the hacked equipment? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 17, 2017 The whole premise of this thread was built off BS and hereyiu go with spin and deflect. Psst...the Trump telling the Russians stuff is another thread and has been confirmed. Flynn info confirmed. Back away man...you're done The whole premise of this thread is how corrupt the Dems were that a guy had enough, released their info and paid for it with his life. Wonder why no Democrats are calling for an investigation into his death. They seem like they don't care or already know who killed him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 17, 2017 Can't answer questions that conflict with the Russia hacking theory. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 17, 2017 Can't answer questions that conflict with the Russia hacking theory. Starts thread based on a bogus claim from a guy...spins and deflects and is back whining about Russians hacking. Psst...Russian hacking has the backing of the Intel Community including Trumps handpicked guy in Pompeo. You believe any random guy who questions it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 17, 2017 Starts thread based on a bogus claim from a guy...spins and deflects and is back whining about Russians hacking. Psst...Russian hacking has the backing of the Intel Community including Trumps handpicked guy in Pompeo. You believe any random guy who questions it... Evidence supports that it was Seth Rich (previous intel people stated evidence indicated it was an inside job). ZERO evidence submitted showing the equipment was hacked and the DNC won't let anyone investigate it; INCLUDING former Democratic appointed FBI Director. That alone calls into question the whole 'hacking' angle. Where did Pompeo state the DNC was hacked by Russia? And I'm not referring to him stating Russian hacking in general. We're talking about the DNC here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 17, 2017 Evidence supports that it was Seth Rich (previous intel people stated evidence indicated it was an inside job). ZERO evidence submitted showing the equipment was hacked and the DNC won't let anyone investigate it; INCLUDING former Democratic appointed FBI Director. That alone calls into question the whole 'hacking' angle. Where did Pompeo state the DNC was hacked by Russia? And I'm not referring to him stating Russian hacking in general. We're talking about the DNC here. Holy ...were yiu not embarrassed enough by pizza gate? The IC community agrees it was Russia...people going on the record as such. One unnamed guy says Rich had emails to Wiki and you claim evidence supports your theory. You can't be serious with that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 17, 2017 Holy ######...were yiu not embarrassed enough by pizza gate? The IC community agrees it was Russia...people going on the record as such. One unnamed guy says Rich had emails to Wiki and you claim evidence supports your theory. You can't be serious with that? The IC community rubber stamped the Crowdstrike report paid for by DNC. Stay on point: Where did Pompeo state the DNC was hacked by Russians? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,958 Posted May 17, 2017 The IC community rubber stamped the Crowdstrike report paid for by DNC. Stay on point: Where did Pompeo state the DNC was hacked by Russians? Wait, Slownuff has been stating numerous times that Pompeo said the Russians did the DNC hack and gave it to wikikleaks and has yet to provide a quote from him? Yeah, he's just making it up now. Sad person Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 17, 2017 Wait, Slownuff has been stating numerous times that Pompeo said the Russians did the DNC hack and gave it to wikikleaks and has yet to provide a quote from him? Yeah, he's just making it up now. Sad person Exactly. The only thing Pompeo has stated was the Russians were agressively hacking which they've done since the beginning of the computer age i.e. normal ops. He can't quote that which doesn't exist. He busy furiously searching now for anything REMOTELY like it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites