Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
peenie

Big butts sexy or no?

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, zsasz said:

Judging these Conservative jabronis by how they're obsessed with the sexualization of minors...I'd say most of the clowns on this site are more attracted to a "younger" style girl body than a woman with curves.  

Translation: You married fatty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/8/2023 at 8:02 PM, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

 

The average guy can learn a lot about women from Sex And The City ( or other shows/films that are seen as aimed only towards women) if they pay attention. 

Here Charlotte and Carrie are essentially fighting about money. But money and friendship is a very complex subject. This scene has a lot of subtext to it. Charlotte is a "traditional beauty", who is also the youngest by age of the four main characters, that is just going to find it easier to find someone wealthy to take care of her, if that's her choice, in this "universe" 

Carrie however is in a different boat. Darren Star constructed her more in line with the audience's POV (probably a bit more than Candice Bushnell's original book) so they can relate to this world and context. Sarah Jessica Parker was cast for the express reason that she is considered "non conventionally attractive"

Carrie Bradshaw's pathology here though is a pretty huge neon sign of what is to come with someone like this. Much of the lesson here is that men operate with other men far differently than women operate with other women. Men typically value tenure and loyalty. It matters if someone stood by you, thick or thin, even if they don't have a ton of status in the future. The majority of women however operate to pure utility. Carrie and Charlotte are not really friends. Not in the honest conventional sense. Both are useful to each other in some way. When that utility ends, so does the "relationship" between them. 

The design was for the audience to lean towards Carrie's situation and POV here, she is the "star character", but the subtext is pretty interesting. It's that Charlotte does suffer despite "being the pretty one"  Everyone has problems, some people just have different kinds of problems where most people can't relate. 

You can learn from anything if the potential is there. You don't see it. OK, so that's not everyone else's fault that you can't see it. The answer is for you to level up, not demand everyone else stoop down. 

You will find though that when the show originally started, many watchers did love Carrie; wanted to be her, or found themselves as her. However, as those women have aged, they relate more to the other characters and see how incredibly entitled and flawed Carrie was. She did use people, expected her "friends" to give into her because she was going through hard times, she lied, she cheated. She really wasn't that great of a friend. 

As a woman, I operate more as your defined "man friendships." I don't like being a utility to my female friends and I don't treat mine that way either. It's probably the reason why my friend circle has gotten smaller, as I set boundaries. I despise being used. Give me an honest and loyal friendship that lasts forever versus a superficial one where they just call me when they need something. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

You will find though that when the show originally started, many watchers did love Carrie; wanted to be her, or found themselves as her. However, as those women have aged, they relate more to the other characters and see how incredibly entitled and flawed Carrie was. She did use people, expected her "friends" to give into her because she was going through hard times, she lied, she cheated. She really wasn't that great of a friend. 

As a woman, I operate more as your defined "man friendships." I don't like being a utility to my female friends and I don't treat mine that way either. It's probably the reason why my friend circle has gotten smaller, as I set boundaries. I despise being used. Give me an honest and loyal friendship that lasts forever versus a superficial one where they just call me when they need something. 

 

 

 

So it appears, interesting enough, that you replied earlier, then I stepped away for a few hours, then that reply disappeared. Maybe the topic was too personal and you decided to delete it. To answer, moderately so, what I can remember in your previous post, I do not advocate for cruelty to others for sport. I don't agree with someone disparaging you as such. 

That being said, we can only control our reactions to things. If you "react" and it holds you, it gives another person power over you. But I recognize that body self image for women is a much more complex issue. A lot of men don't understand the difference between savagery and pure cruelty. The bedrock of savagery comes from the basis of some core value system or principle. It's the release of restraint of the monster within built around real boundaries. Cruelty is just the cowardly application of open malice. Tragically if appears you encountered the latter, by someone who did so for personal sport. 

The best answer I can give is I would wish for you to extend kindness to yourself. You are defined by your choices and your character, not external attributes that are fleeting. 

There's a film by Mike Nichols called "Closer" It stars Jude Law, Natalie Portman, Julia Roberts and Clive Owen ( Owen starred in the original play as well) It has some interesting subtext about relationship dynamics and how to detach yourself from cruelty. If you haven't seen it, I think it would help you to do so. But that's your choice. If you do though, I can start new thread topic at some point, and we can discuss it openly there. Might be a pretty interesting exchange and discussion of different ideas and viewpoints. Let me know if that interests you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wiffleball said:

It's always a matter of degree, right?  I prefer you don't have an ass like Gilligan when I'm docking the little smikeyt, but Kim Kardashian just looks freaking stupid. And then she just launched an entire generation of bubble butt fat asses.

There is an ideal waist to hip ratio, I think about 70%.  Explains the classic 36 24 36 ideal when I was growing up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

You will find though that when the show originally started, many watchers did love Carrie; wanted to be her, or found themselves as her. However, as those women have aged, they relate more to the other characters and see how incredibly entitled and flawed Carrie was. She did use people, expected her "friends" to give into her because she was going through hard times, she lied, she cheated. She really wasn't that great of a friend. 

As a woman, I operate more as your defined "man friendships." I don't like being a utility to my female friends and I don't treat mine that way either. It's probably the reason why my friend circle has gotten smaller, as I set boundaries. I despise being used. Give me an honest and loyal friendship that lasts forever versus a superficial one where they just call me when they need something. 

 

 Why the long face?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RogerDodger said:

Translation: You married fatty.

But I regularly fock your mom!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, zsasz said:

But I regularly fock your mom!

Who hasn’t?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×